Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon to test F-35 against A-10 in 'common sense' war scenario showdown
Stars and Stripes ^ | April 26, 2016 | By Travis J. Tritten

Posted on 04/27/2016 3:58:00 PM PDT by Chode

WASHINGTON – A showdown might soon settle one of the U.S. military’s biggest air power controversies.

The high-tech and expensive F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will face off in upcoming testing with the Air Force’s aging close-air-support stalwart, the A-10 Thunderbolt II, the director of the Defense Department operational test and evaluation office said Tuesday.

The battlefield comparison “makes common sense” and will pit the two airframes against each other in a variety of war scenarios this year, Michael Gilmore said during Senate testimony.

The department is in the midst of developing the F-35 – the most expensive procurement program in its history – to take over the A-10’s four-decade-old role of supporting ground forces with its titanium armor and powerful nose cannon. But the move is opposed by infantry troops and members of Congress who believe the A-10 is uniquely capable of saving lives on the battlefield.

“To me, comparison testing just makes common sense,” Gilmore said. “If you’re spending a lot of money to get improved capability, that’s the easiest way to demonstrate it is to do a rigorous comparison test.”

The F-35 is being touted as the most advanced fighter jet in the world, a jack of all trades intended to take over a variety of roles from other aircraft, including the A-10 and the F-16 fighter jet. The Marine Corps declared its variant of the aircraft combat-ready last summer and the Air Force plans to complete its testing this year.

But its 15-year procurement quest has been riddled with delays, scandals and technical glitches. The F-35 program office is now trying to overcome a problem with the aircraft’s software system that caused the radar to blink out and require rebooting during flight.

The program, including production and maintenance, could ultimately cost taxpayers about $1.4 trillion and, despite promises of air dominance, the F-35 remains untested in real combat – especially the type typically waged by the 1970s-era Warthog.

The A-10, on the other hand, is now deployed in the war against the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria and has built a devoted following among combat veterans. But the airframe is aging and the Air Force now plans to retire the Warthog and unshoulder the costs of upkeep by 2022.

Gilmore said the two aircraft will face off on close air support and combat search and rescue, as well as other missions.

“We’re going to do it under all the circumstances that we see CAS [close air support] conducted, including under high-threat conditions in which we expect F-35 will have an advantage and other conditions requiring loitering on the target, low-altitude operations and so-forth,” Gilmore told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

On paper, the F-35 faces some apparent challenges because it does not carry the firepower of the Gatling-style nose cannon or the ability to fly over targets for a long period of time compared to the Warthog.

“There are a lot of arguments that ensues over which aircraft might have the advantage, the A-10 or the F-35, but that is what the comparison test is meant to show us,” Gilmore said.

The controversy over whether the two aircraft will have similar capabilities became murkier in March when Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh testified to the Senate committee that the F-35 would not replace the A-10.

During the hearing Tuesday, Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., said the general’s earlier testimony appeared to contradict statements on the fighter jet program’s website and its longtime aim to take over the Warthog responsibilities.

The Pentagon’s top weapons buyer denied any contradiction.

“Both statements are correct. We will in fact replace the A-10s with F-35s, that is the plan,” said Frank Kendall, under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics.

But Kendall said there should be no expectation that the F-35 will perform in the same way as the A-10 on the battlefield.

“The A-10 was designed to be low and slow and close to the targets it was engaging, relatively speaking,” he said. “We will not use the F-35 in the same way as the A-10, so it will perform the mission very differently.”

tritten.travis@stripes.com Twitter: @Travis_Tritten


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: centurion316

They would have to reconstitute and restart the F-22 line. We are not smart enough to mothball that stuff for a rainy day.


21 posted on 04/27/2016 4:26:37 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

They would have to reconstitute and restart the F-22 line. We are not smart enough to mothball that stuff for a rainy day.


22 posted on 04/27/2016 4:26:40 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
100% A-10 can loiter ~1hour, the F-35 can do what, one PASS?
23 posted on 04/27/2016 4:29:13 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Chode

The A-10 for CAS. By a lot.

The F-35 for everything else.

But IMHO the F-22 would kick the F-35’s tail in “everything else.”


24 posted on 04/27/2016 4:30:20 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

That’s not the test. It’s ability to provide CAS and SAR.
The hog WAS designed for that.
If the AF wants to get rid of the A10, the Army should insist on their transfer...


25 posted on 04/27/2016 4:30:22 PM PDT by Kozak (ALLAH AKBAR = HEIL HITLER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
My guess would be the F-35. It could acquire the A-10 and launch radar guided air-to-air missiles from at least 50 miles away.

So could a run of the mill F-16. I think what they mean is, can the F-35 Porkdodo linger over a battlefield and provide CAS the way a 'Hog can. The mission is, provide CAS.

26 posted on 04/27/2016 4:31:11 PM PDT by Sirius Lee (Crump or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chode

“guess who wins...”

Sort of like expecting a Don King boxer to lose.


27 posted on 04/27/2016 4:32:13 PM PDT by pleasenotcalifornia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44
"I hate the F-35. Even the designation was screwed up."

Clusterf*ck, including massive cost overruns.. Almost as if the whole thing was by design as part of the overall weakening of America. It doesn't even LOOK menacing. The F-16, F/A-18, F-22 and even the A-10 (with mouth painted on) LOOKS menacing.

28 posted on 04/27/2016 4:32:14 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chode

A lot of things the A-10 can accomplish, can be done even better by an AC-130 Spectre. It is very vulnerable to anti aircraft but I have read that the A-10 is also despite all that armor.


29 posted on 04/27/2016 4:33:38 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Look Ma! Flying turds!


30 posted on 04/27/2016 4:44:37 PM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Chode

The F-35 will either miss the enemy, or hit our troops, as it zooms by on its single pass ever ten minutes or so.


31 posted on 04/27/2016 4:45:06 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

Good points.


32 posted on 04/27/2016 4:45:31 PM PDT by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullete)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

“Now we’re potentially in a dogfight for which the F-35 is not designed.”

I thought they were just talking about ground support tests.


33 posted on 04/27/2016 4:45:41 PM PDT by dljordan (WhoVoltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Well ... I've not heard of much dog fighting since WW2 ...

Not that it doesn't happen

I just never hear of it ... and if it DOES occur, I don't think it's enough to support a completely new airframe

From what I see ... the A-10 is the perfect platform to work with/from

Build the same thing with more modern materials, but keep the Hog.

34 posted on 04/27/2016 4:46:21 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

The A-10 can be based from a rough airfield that is only minutes from take off to targets. The airfields can be shifted constantly, even landing on roads etc. A C-130 is not nicknamed “Fat Albert” for nothing. Great if you own the entire battlespace above the treetops, but terrible if an enemy has manpads. Sitting ducks, then.


35 posted on 04/27/2016 4:47:21 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Chode

They were desperate to find a plane the 35 could at least outrun.


36 posted on 04/27/2016 4:48:59 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

This isn’t A-10 fighting the F-35, it is both planes accomplishing the same missions and seeing which has the advantage. I wonder if the F-35 could even beat the A-1 Spad.


37 posted on 04/27/2016 4:50:30 PM PDT by NonValueAdded ("HeÂ’s a winner in the process of winning. People like that." Scott Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

“I thought they were just talking about ground support tests.”

I was riffing on the near uselessness of having a huge technical advantage, beyond visual range shoot-down capability, and not being politically allowed to use it.


38 posted on 04/27/2016 4:51:34 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
I remember during the first Gulf War one A-10 pilot shot down two Iraqi helicopters.
39 posted on 04/27/2016 4:52:05 PM PDT by 4yearlurker (We have leaped off the cliff toward madness and we are still falling...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I sometimes wonder how an updated Skyraider would do. they had a really good lift capacity and were really tough from what I have read.


40 posted on 04/27/2016 4:53:35 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson