Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police hunt two bank robbers who wrapped themselves head-to-toe in TINFOIL
Daily Mail ^ | 4/10/16 | Gerard Couzens

Posted on 04/10/2016 4:33:12 PM PDT by Libloather

Police hunt two Brazilian bank robbers who wrapped themselves head-to-toe in TINFOIL in successful bid to beat alarm system

Police in Brazil are hunting two bank robbers who wrapped themselves up in tin foil in a bizarre attempt to fool its alarm system.

The daring ruse worked and the alarm didn't sound - but an armed police response unit was mobilised after they were picked up moving around inside the bank in their odd disguises on a central CCTV monitoring system.

An accomplice believed to have been acting as a lookout was arrested - but the two men whose faces were hidden under their head-to-toe disguise got away.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bank; police; robbers; tinfoil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: gaijin

“Seems mute, as it wouldn’t also prevent motion detection.”

It will stop motion detection if the detector is IR only.

A good microwave/IR duel tech detector costs 10 times what a cheapie IR only detector does. Businesses (and this includes some banks) cheap out on equipment all the time. I have never seen a good, high grade digital camera installed in a bank, everything I see is just a step above the 7-11 junk that barely tells the race of the person on the video. There are cams that can tell how long ago you shaved, and they are not that much more expensive.

Same deal on detectors. There isn’t really all that much to secure in a bank, so they do not pop for 10,000+ dollar security systems.

Tinfoil works, as does glass and a good strong fan of appropriate diameter.


21 posted on 04/10/2016 5:05:17 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Picture of the getaway car...


22 posted on 04/10/2016 5:07:42 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I guess their plan was foiled.


23 posted on 04/10/2016 5:10:50 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why do folks insist on calling it tin foil when it’s ALUMINUM foil. /chemist pet peeve


24 posted on 04/10/2016 5:13:25 PM PDT by Rio (Proud resident of the State of Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“Police hunt two bank robbers who wrapped themselves head-to-toe in TINFOIL”

The bank was robbed by leftovers who promptly escaped in
a nondescript refrigerator.


25 posted on 04/10/2016 5:16:53 PM PDT by Slambat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

I can attest to how banks will cheap out on any and everything.

A few years ago, I did some contractor work for BofA through an outfit that was beyond awful. They cheaped out even beyond BofA. I was out of work and needed something.

I will eat grass and pick up cans from the side of the road before I get involved with anything like that or electronics recycling.


26 posted on 04/10/2016 5:43:09 PM PDT by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rio
Why do folks insist on calling it tin foil when it’s ALUMINUM foil. /chemist pet peeve

Yeah, that's one pre-WWII piece of the vernacular that really won't die.

27 posted on 04/10/2016 6:33:07 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why does everyone call aluminum foil “tinfoil”?


28 posted on 04/10/2016 6:41:05 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Why does everyone call aluminum foil “tinfoil”?


29 posted on 04/10/2016 6:41:06 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Are they 9/11 “truther” ...??

They usually just wrap their heads in tinfoil.....


30 posted on 04/10/2016 6:50:09 PM PDT by njslim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: njslim

I don’t know, but the Reynold’s Wrap folks must be paying close attention. LOL


31 posted on 04/10/2016 6:56:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Hey Ted, why are you taking one for the RNC/GOPe team, and not ours? Not that we don't know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So what are their screen names on FR?


32 posted on 04/10/2016 8:36:18 PM PDT by Daffynition ("We have the fight of our lives coming up to save our nation!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

http://mentalfloss.com/article/56563/why-do-we-sometimes-call-aluminum-foil-tin-foil


33 posted on 04/10/2016 8:37:53 PM PDT by Daffynition ("We have the fight of our lives coming up to save our nation!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

BTW: Edison’s first phonograph WAS a “tin-foil phonograph.” I don’t think there was aluminum foil in 1877.


34 posted on 04/10/2016 8:45:50 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

“Tin foil had other uses, too. It was also used as a recording medium for a time (Thomas Edison’s famous 1877 recitation of “Mary Had a Little Lamb” was on tin), but because the recordings didn’t last very long, manufacturers switched to wax cylinders.”

This paragraph is really off the wall. There WERE no “manufacturers” of recordings until around 1890, and no “manufacturers” ever “switched” from tin foil to wax.

The tin foil recordings made on Edison’s first machines lasted only until the foil was unwrapped from the mandrel. Some still exist, as flat pieces of foil, and it is possible to read them with lasers. Edison abandoned the phonograph for ten years, and then others began to experiment with wax cylinders and discs. Edison then took up the phonograph again.


35 posted on 04/10/2016 8:51:21 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Foil is a good feline repellent
36 posted on 04/10/2016 8:51:27 PM PDT by wyokostur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

I thought I was being kind.

Do your own research.


37 posted on 04/10/2016 9:16:52 PM PDT by Daffynition ("We have the fight of our lives coming up to save our nation!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

I was just pointing out that ONE paragraph was off the wall.

Excuuuuuse me!


38 posted on 04/10/2016 9:23:18 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

PFFFFFFFT!


39 posted on 04/10/2016 9:27:14 PM PDT by Daffynition ("We have the fight of our lives coming up to save our nation!" ~ Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Did I attack you??????

I thought I was being chatty and interesting, just pointing out that ONE paragraph was a little out of kilter.

What did I say that was so offensive?????


40 posted on 04/10/2016 9:36:03 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson