Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radiation blown onto highway at Hanford ‘alarming’ to EPA
spokesman.com ^ | February 22, 2016 | no byline

Posted on 02/24/2016 3:24:19 PM PST by ransomnote

RICHLAND – The Environmental Protection Agency says the uncontrolled spread of small amounts of radioactive waste at Hanford after a Nov. 17 windstorm is alarming.

The winds pushed specks of contamination beyond Route 4, the public highway from Richland out to the Wye Barricade entrance to Hanford.

The Tri-City Herald reports that tests found no contamination on the public highway. And the Department of Energy concluded that workers and the public are not at risk of exposure.

But the EPA in a letter says the uncontrolled spread of contamination “is a matter that is alarming to EPA and requires further investigation and discussion.”

It has given the Energy Department until the third week of April to prepare a report on its loss of control of radioactive material.

(Excerpt) Read more at spokesman.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: epa; hanford; radiation; washingtonstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: ransomnote

Uh...this isn’t about a “nuke plant”.

This is about particulate from the clean up of the waste storage.

Where did you get the idea “Nuke plant said all radiation contained.”???

These are trace amounts.

If you’re worried about these levels you’d better stay out of the sun.


21 posted on 02/24/2016 8:24:24 PM PST by G Larry (ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS impose SLAVE WAGES on LEGAL Immigrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

This is the same nuclear facility that is responsible for the banning of phosphates from detergents coast to coast - because some dingus in eastern Washington assumed that dishwashers and washing machines were responsible for the tons and tons of byproducts that Hanford regularly dumps into the Green River.


22 posted on 02/25/2016 5:42:59 AM PST by detsaoT (Environmentalists are mindless zealots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detsaoT

Further reading:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14738272

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2690175/posts


23 posted on 02/25/2016 5:46:48 AM PST by detsaoT (Environmentalists are mindless zealots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: detsaoT

(Correction: western Washington. :) )


24 posted on 02/25/2016 5:47:22 AM PST by detsaoT (Environmentalists are mindless zealots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Where there is nuke fuel, there is a history of nuke plant involvement. But yes, I could drop it in this case because it is the incompetent storage of said nuke fuel. As I skimmed web articles, “authorities” claimed all radiation was contained but obviously it wasn’t.

Of course you know that the gamma radiation from the sun does cause skin cancer but it entirely unrelated to particles of refined nuclear fuel blowing around - there’s no comparison (unless you unwittingly ingest part of the sun).


25 posted on 02/25/2016 10:52:19 AM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson