Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I Love My Guns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YN6rjamk0Q0 ^ | Mark Carmen | 10-3-15

Posted on 10/07/2015 7:20:35 AM PDT by Paul46360

“Folks, we’ve got a problem. I love firearms, I do. I’m trained in their use, I’m skilled in their use, I’m trained in safety, and I’m a responsible firearm owner.
And this is a message to responsible firearm owners. People, at some point, we’re going to have to come to the conclusion that we’re going to need to get guns away from people who shouldn’t have them.”

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Religion; Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; guns; laws; purchase; society
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 10/07/2015 7:20:35 AM PDT by Paul46360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paul46360
people who shouldn’t have themp The devil is in the details.
2 posted on 10/07/2015 7:23:14 AM PDT by super7man (Oh why did I post that, now I'll never be able to run for Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

People who cannot be trusted to not misuse firearms cannot be trusted with being in society; it is part of the social contract that is the basis for our Constitution.


3 posted on 10/07/2015 7:23:45 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

Anyone who can’t be trusted to bear arms should not be running around loose.


4 posted on 10/07/2015 7:27:18 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: super7man

The people that shouldn’t have them will always have them. There is no law that will change that.


5 posted on 10/07/2015 7:28:29 AM PDT by RC one (....and subject to the jurisdiction thereof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

“People, at some point, we’re going to have to come to the conclusion that we’re going to need to get guns away from people who shouldn’t have them.”

Funny...that’s the way libs feel about ALL gun owners.


6 posted on 10/07/2015 7:30:04 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

The Rainbow House Homo has his dream - a National Socialist police force.


7 posted on 10/07/2015 7:30:42 AM PDT by olepap (Your old Pappy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

America needs mental institutions where patients get real care and are not simply warehoused.

Today we have “medical” facilities that are intended for general health issues for those needing care, and these are being used for dumping the mentally ill.


8 posted on 10/07/2015 7:31:02 AM PDT by G Larry (Vote Hillary! Pro-Abortion Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

Better yet how are we going to keep booze from the people who shouldn’t drink and end up killing 20,000 or more a year in car accidents and add in spousal and child abuse caused by the drunks


9 posted on 10/07/2015 7:32:35 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin
People who cannot be trusted to not misuse firearms cannot be trusted with being in society

I don't understand giving a driver's license to someone that is believed to be too irresponsible to own a firearm.

10 posted on 10/07/2015 7:33:00 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chajin
In every state, until the mid 1960s, there existed mental health facilities to look after citizens who couldn't function under the normal social contract.

A single movie, “One Flew Over the Cookoo’s Nest,” initiated a change.

Institutionalization of the demented was done away with. The Liberals expected the insane to cure themselves by participating in mainstream society.
This has not worked. And we are all the poorer for it.

11 posted on 10/07/2015 7:33:28 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

LINK TO 30 MINUTE RADIO RANT (mainly on islam, gun control, etc.) OF 10/7/2015
You can access the show by clicking on this link to the Gradick Communications site: http://www.gradickcommunications.com/
Go to “PODCAST” and click on the link to the show. You can play it from the site or download it to your computer and play it there.
HOW MUCH TROUBLE ARE WE IN? CAN YOU SAY “EXISTENTIAL”??


12 posted on 10/07/2015 7:35:15 AM PDT by Dick Bachert (This entire "administration" has been a series of Reischstag Fires. We know how that turned out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

“we’re going to need to get guns away from people who shouldn’t have them”

No guns for Democrats. Look at the statistics.


13 posted on 10/07/2015 7:38:33 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

I’ve decided he shouldn’t have them. He needs to turn them all in within 48 hours.


14 posted on 10/07/2015 7:40:38 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360
Who decides who should not have guns?
It can be used politically, therein lies the danger of such laws.
Even if we were able to pinpoint every unstable individual, how can we ever be absolutely certain they never get their hands on one anyway?

If everyone who so chooses are armed, then the ones "who should not have them" will be kept in check, or taken out of circulation if they ever use their gun inappropriately.

15 posted on 10/07/2015 7:42:03 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

“How do you define “the people who shouldn’t have them?”

There are a lot of people who drive drunk who shouldn’t have access to beer, wine, or hard liquor, too.


16 posted on 10/07/2015 7:46:03 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Liberals are like the Taliban and ISIS....destroying cultural icons they don't like.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

17 posted on 10/07/2015 7:55:36 AM PDT by Paul46360
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360
we’re going to need to get guns away from people who shouldn’t have them.”

Starting with employees of about 40 or 50 Federal Agencies who now have the right to carry.

18 posted on 10/07/2015 7:59:44 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

If the originator is correct:

First, no immigrant or illegal invader is allowed to own one, because they are not availed the rights of citizenry. Should they be found with one, lock them up for good, or deport them FOR GOOD, with a price on their head, open to any citizen to collect. Should these folks be found to be part of any major criminal activity, our laws do not apply, and they should be eliminated.

Second, reopen the mental institutions, and place those that have been allowed to roam this country unabetted, back in them.

Third, any doctor that is lax in reporting any real mental illness, as has been noted in a few of these mass shootings, incarcerate THEM for crimes against humanity, for good.

Fourth, remove all ‘blanket gotchas’ against military veterans that have been placed on them by the obama administration, as a punitive action to prevent gun ownership, and place THOSE doctors under NUMBER THREE.

I admit there are those who cannot fend for themselves, and must have daily care given to them for them to survive. I admit, that there are those in the advanced stages of Alzheimer’s disease, along with having to give up their driving privileges, just might have to give this up, as well, to prevent any accidents to others, or to prevent self-inflicted wounds.


19 posted on 10/07/2015 8:02:38 AM PDT by Terry L Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul46360

The idiot in the video is a closet leftist. Just beyond the 7 minute mark in the video he says that the 2nd amendment was intended for a true militia, like the National Guard. He’s wrong.

I stopped viewing right there.


20 posted on 10/07/2015 8:04:51 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson