Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Theory on why gender derangement is #1 issue of Obama presidency
09/27/2015

Posted on 09/27/2015 9:52:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

You can find all kinds of things online about Michelle being a transgender and the children being adopted. Some of it is pretty convincing.

This is the only explanation I can come up with as to why gender derangement disorder is the #1 issue of the Obama regime.

Can anyone else come up with a better explanation?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 09/27/2015 9:52:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He’s prolly conflicted about personal issues on the down-low.


2 posted on 09/27/2015 9:54:35 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"why gender derangement disorder is the #1 issue of the Obama regime. Can anyone else come up with a better explanation?"

Because it was the next thing on the list after the 5,388 things he ruined before?

3 posted on 09/27/2015 9:54:46 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ja ja, das ist ticket.


4 posted on 09/27/2015 9:55:21 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It helps destroy the church. Makes people in groups. It also detracts people from what big brother is doing. Just like the pot issue. Let it be legal, then the masses are stoned, not concerned about big brother.


5 posted on 09/27/2015 9:57:35 AM PDT by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 HillaryForPrison2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Michelle has a classical large-hipped, very fleshed-out female figure. While it is not stylishly attractive by today’s western standards, it is definitely a female figure along the lines of the Rubenesque woman of the nineteenth century. She has none of the large Adam’s apple or shoulders that you see in men pretending to be women.

The liberal support of the alphabet people is because they want to destroy the essential building block of western culture, the family. It was one of the communist goals for destroying America. (No. 40.)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1561529/posts


6 posted on 09/27/2015 10:02:21 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Isn’t the destruction of American society enough? Multi-culturalism and alien colonization isn’t working fast enough>


7 posted on 09/27/2015 10:02:45 AM PDT by JJ_Folderol (Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Do you think the United States will see the first gay president or the first woman president?”

The answer to that question posed to Joan Rivers by a cameraman on the streets of New York has the 81-year-old comic in hot water.

What did she say?

“We already have it with Obama, so let’s just calm down.”

But she didn’t stop there: It’s what she said next that’s caused particular outrage.

As Rivers continued walking past, she turned her head and added, “You know Michelle is a tranny.”

The cameraman responded, “I’m sorry, she’s a what?”

“A transgender. We all know,” Rivers said as she walked toward a building.


8 posted on 09/27/2015 10:06:33 AM PDT by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

And weeks later an unknown “doctor” in her “entourage” barged into a medical procedure to do a “biopsy” and she died.

Quite a coincidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdeq206ZjA4


9 posted on 09/27/2015 10:11:30 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Is the Pope Catholic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Read his poem “Pop”, or his book were he talks about his homo nanny.


10 posted on 09/27/2015 10:22:30 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

His nanny was not a homo. It was tranny.


11 posted on 09/27/2015 10:24:43 AM PDT by raybbr (Obamacare needs a deatha panel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Did it get castrated or was it just a cross-dresser?


12 posted on 09/27/2015 10:26:35 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I have always felt Obama was a closeted sodomite who married the manliest girl he could find to try to resist his impulses.


13 posted on 09/27/2015 10:27:34 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
If you understand that everything Obama does is aimed at hurting America, then everything he does makes sense. The only thing preventing him from simply pointing all our nukes at ourselves and pressing the launch button is the "can I get away with this" factor.

He surely knows, from personal experience, that homosexuality destroys the soul and confuses the mind. So, it makes perfect sense that he wants this to spread as much as possible.

14 posted on 09/27/2015 10:29:31 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
In any case, Obama is definitely a fag.


15 posted on 09/27/2015 10:30:09 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

16 posted on 09/27/2015 10:34:12 AM PDT by nascarnation (C. Edmund Wright says I'm a moron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3200158/posts
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
Frontpagemag.com ^ | 9-2-2014 | Mallory Millett

...It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:

“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”

Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?

“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.

They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.

It fell on my ears as a ludicrous scheme, as if they were a band of highly imaginative children planning a Brinks robbery; a lark trumped up on a snowy night amongst a group of spoiled brats over booze and hashish.

To me, this sounded silly. I was enduring culture shock after having been cut-off from my homeland, living in Third-World countries for years with not one trip back to the United States. I was one of those people who, upon returning to American soil, fell out of the plane blubbering with ecstasy at being home in the USA. I knelt on the ground covering it with kisses. I had learned just exactly how delicious was the land of my birth and didn’t care what anyone thought because they just hadn’t seen what I had or been where I had been. I had seen factory workers and sex-slaves chained to walls...


17 posted on 09/27/2015 10:37:07 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Will Bernie Sanders run as an Independent if he does not get the nomination of the Democrat Party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
body build alone is not indicative of your sexuality...

and the fingers....if you look at my hands, you'll see arthritis twisting my fingers but I've always had small hands but my fingers are not typical of a female...although I know I stubbed several fingers as a kid....I am definitely not transgender...

however, add it all up...the large shoulders...the hands..the crock shots...the manly abrasive nature...the lack of normal female concerns...the white hut creep referring to her as "micheal" and the lack of any background info or pics of "Michele" as a pregnant woman ....just add it all up...then it makes perfect sense....

the power of the media to conjure up any tale they want...

18 posted on 09/27/2015 10:44:12 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Michelle maybe but she is irrelevent

Barry obviously has many serious, deep conflicts however

identity, nationality, faith, and sexuality just being the start


19 posted on 09/27/2015 10:45:35 AM PDT by faithhopecharity (Brilliant, funny, and incisive Tagline coming to this space soon.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I’m just going to guess but I think the most evil most destructive leaders of the world have been homosexuals or had homo tendencies...


20 posted on 09/27/2015 10:47:59 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson