Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Completes Its Third Cessna Crash Test
Popular Science ^ | 8/28/2015 | Atherton

Posted on 08/27/2015 6:49:49 AM PDT by Purdue77

NASA Completes Its Third Cessna Crash Test.

Popular Science (8/26, Atherton) reports on Wednesday’s crash test of a Cessna aircraft by NASA as part of a study to try to improve emergency location transmitters (ELTs). This third test involved “a tail-first crash into soil, which flipped the plane but didn’t crush it in on its crash-test-dummy occupants so much.”

(Excerpt) Read more at popsci.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: cessna; crash; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I conducted a crash test in 1978 with a Cessna 152 when I stalled it about 12 feet over the runway. I survived. My flight check instructor survived. And, the airplane survived. I also passed my check ride. Don't know if the ELT activated.
1 posted on 08/27/2015 6:49:49 AM PDT by Purdue77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Well, any landing you can walk away from...............


2 posted on 08/27/2015 6:51:09 AM PDT by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77
when I stalled it about 12 feet over the runway.

Sounds like my normal landings...

3 posted on 08/27/2015 6:54:36 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

how the hell did you fit two grown men side by side in a C152? :)


4 posted on 08/27/2015 6:55:32 AM PDT by Axeslinger (Where has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Heh. While I doubt you stuck the landing after stalling at 12 feet, how many times did you ‘land’ so to speak?

The landing gear of the 152 are quite resilient ;-)


5 posted on 08/27/2015 6:56:52 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Stalled a 152? Hummmm.....Glad you and the instructor were OK.


6 posted on 08/27/2015 6:57:18 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Section 20.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

I’ve gone up in hundreds of Cessnas, haven’t landed in many, though.


7 posted on 08/27/2015 6:58:50 AM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

“The landing gear of the 152 are quite resilient ;-)”

One of my first night landings proved that. Man did I hit hard.


8 posted on 08/27/2015 7:01:33 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blueflag

Coming in for my first solo, I was a little high, the sun visor fell in my lap, all went well for the next two take offs and landings!


9 posted on 08/27/2015 7:05:40 AM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gorush
 photo jump.jpg
10 posted on 08/27/2015 7:06:49 AM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48
I was a little high

Weed and speed don't mix.
11 posted on 08/27/2015 7:16:02 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing.


12 posted on 08/27/2015 7:25:08 AM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

true words


13 posted on 08/27/2015 7:27:04 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

indeed....the 152 is used by beginners precisely because it is so darned hard to stall out


14 posted on 08/27/2015 7:27:56 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

C-152 is a hard plane to land. Heavier birds are easier to land IMO.


15 posted on 08/27/2015 7:29:47 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: central_va

didn’t say it was easier to land....said it was very hard to stall out


16 posted on 08/27/2015 7:45:49 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

With full flaps a C-152 is very hard to stall.


17 posted on 08/27/2015 7:46:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Purdue77

Did they have ELT’s in ‘78?


18 posted on 08/27/2015 7:57:00 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

Not that kind of high! Lol


19 posted on 08/27/2015 8:01:41 AM PDT by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

The 152 (N18528) that I flew in 73 had one.


20 posted on 08/27/2015 8:10:20 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson