Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem; rockrr
Dig hard and you will find some historian that will say Sherman's tactics “didn't quite reach” the technical definition of total war.

Dig hard? You find it in that very same article:

Scholars taking issue with the notion that Sherman was employing "total war" include Noah Andre Trudeau. Trudeau believes that Sherman's goals and methods do not meet the definition of total war and to suggest as much is to "misread Sherman's intentions and to misunderstand the results of what happened."

So who to trust?

A recognized expert who wrote a dozen books on the Civil War, or some random guy anonymously spouting intemperate opinions on the Internet?

You, I guess. After all, his name is French, and the same as Canada's longtime quasi-socialist prime minister.

553 posted on 07/28/2015 1:56:16 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies ]


To: x
“So who to trust?”

Why not trust General Sherman himself. Here's what he said about total war, or near-total war if you prefer.

“The government of the U.S. has any and all rights which they choose to enforce in war - to take their lives, their homes, their land, their everything...war is simply unrestrained by the Constitution...to the persistent secessionist, why, death is mercy, and the quicker he or she is disposed of the better...”

“Look to the South and you who went with us through that land can best say if they have not been fearfully punished. Mourning is in every household, desolation written in broad characters across the whole face of their country, cities in ashes and fields laid waste, their commerce gone, their system of labor annihilated and destroyed. Ruin and poverty and distress everywhere, and now pestilence adding to the very cap sheaf of their stack of misery...”

“There is a class of people men, women and children, who must be killed or banished before you can hope for peace and order.”

Sherman estimated that the March to the Sea campaign had inflicted $100 million in destruction, about one fifth of which “inured to our advantage” while the “remainder is simple waste and destruction.”

After practicing on the South, Sherman turned west.

“The more Indians we can kill this year the fewer we will need to kill the next, because the more I see of the Indians the more convinced I become that they must either all be killed or be maintained as a species of pauper. Their attempts at civilization is ridiculous...”

I'm not sure why you would want to deny General Sherman, with Lincoln's approval, conducted total warfare against civilians. General Sherman reveled in it . . . perhaps given your view, you should too.

554 posted on 07/28/2015 3:38:58 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson