Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Deep, Dark Mystery [Helium leakage from Earth's mantle in Los Angeles Basin]
UC Santa Barbara ^ | 6/29/15 | Julie Cohen

Posted on 06/29/2015 4:25:13 PM PDT by markomalley

UC Santa Barbara geologist Jim Boles has found evidence of helium leakage from the Earth’s mantle along a 30-mile stretch of the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone in the Los Angeles Basin. Using samples of casing gas from two dozen oil wells ranging from LA’s Westside to Newport Beach in Orange County, Boles discovered that more than one-third of the sites — some of the deepest ones — show evidence of high levels of helium-3 (3He).

Considered primordial, 3He is a vestige of the Big Bang. Its only terrestrial source is the mantle. Leakage of 3He suggests that the Newport-Inglewood fault is deeper than scientists previously thought. Boles’s findings appear in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems (G-Cubed), an electronic journal of the American Geophysical Union and the Geochemical Society.

“The results are unexpected for the area, because the LA Basin is different from where most mantle helium anomalies occur,” said Boles, professor emeritus in UCSB’s Department of Earth Science. “The Newport-Inglewood fault appears to sit on a 30-million-year-old subduction zone, so it is surprising that it maintains a significant pathway through the crust.”

When Boles and his co-authors analyzed the 24 gas samples, they found that high levels of 3He inversely correlate with carbon dioxide (CO2), which Boles noted acts as a carrier gas for 3He. An analysis showed that the CO2 was also from the mantle, confirming leakage from deep inside the Earth.

Blueschist found at the bottom of nearby deep wells indicates that the Newport-Inglewood fault is an ancient subduction zone — where two tectonic plates collide — even though its location is more than 40 miles west of the current plate boundary of the San Andreas Fault System. Found 20 miles down, blueschist is a metamorphic rock only revealed when regurgitated to the surface via geologic upheaval.

“About 30 million years ago, the Pacific plate was colliding with the North American plate, which created a subduction zone at the Newport-Inglewood fault,” Boles explained. “Then somehow that intersection jumped clear over to the present San Andreas Fault, although how this occurred is really not known. This paper shows that the mantle is leaking more at the Newport-Inglewood fault zone than at the San Andreas Fault, which is a new discovery.”

The study’s findings contradict a scientific hypothesis that supports the existence of a major décollement — a low-angle thrust fault — below the surface of the LA Basin. “We show that the Newport-Inglewood fault is not only deep-seated but also directly or indirectly connected with the mantle,” Boles said.

“If the décollement existed, it would have to cross the Newport-Inglewood fault zone, which isn’t likely,” he added. “Our findings indicate that the Newport-Inglewood fault is a lot more important than previously thought, but time will tell what the true importance of all this is.”

Study co-authors include Grant Garven of Tufts University; Hilario Camacho of Occidental Oil and Gas Corp.; and John Lupton of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.

This research was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science and Office of Basic Energy Sciences and by the NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: 3he; california; carbondioxide; catastrophism; co2; earthmantle; earthquake; h3; he3; helium; helium3; losangeles; mantle; oops; orangecounty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: markomalley

Compton, Calif. after the Long Beach Earthquake, which occurred on the fault in question. My aunt lived at the time in Compton, about a half a mile from where the picture was taken. She and her neighbors were afraid to return to their homes for several days for fear of aftershocks.
21 posted on 06/29/2015 6:00:17 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: panzerkamphwageneinz
All geology points to a noachic flood.

Didn't it rain!

22 posted on 06/29/2015 6:04:07 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
“About 30 million years ago,

Well, if they start there, everything else is likely to be wrong as well. So no wonder their 'theories' don't work out.

23 posted on 06/29/2015 6:07:45 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

There can be large gas leaks before a major earthquake hits....


24 posted on 06/29/2015 6:51:52 PM PDT by CharlotteVRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red; 75thOVI; Abathar; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; ..

Thanks Bigg Red.
[snip] ...helium-3 (3He)... is a vestige of the Big Bang. Its only terrestrial source is the mantle. Leakage of 3He suggests that the Newport-Inglewood fault is deeper than scientists previously thought... "The results are unexpected for the area, because the LA Basin is different from where most mantle helium anomalies occur," said Boles, professor emeritus in UCSB's Department of Earth Science. 'The Newport-Inglewood fault appears to sit on a 30-million-year-old subduction zone, so it is surprising that it maintains a significant pathway through the crust."... high levels of 3He inversely correlate with carbon dioxide (CO2), which Boles noted acts as a carrier gas for 3He. An analysis showed that the CO2 was also from the mantle, confirming leakage from deep inside the Earth. [/snip]
Sounds like big trouble. :'o

25 posted on 06/29/2015 8:10:12 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"If it is correct — then this is very bad news."

What do you think this indicates, if their data is correct?

26 posted on 06/30/2015 2:22:42 AM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

Newport-Inglewood fault has long been considered a severe threat. It runs under or near the most densely populated areas of LA, including the nationally critical Port of Los Angeles.

Heaven knows old Ben is no scientist, sounds to me that if it extends all the way down to the mantle — then a quake on it will be more devastating than ever thought possible.


27 posted on 06/30/2015 5:30:15 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CharlotteVRWC

Yep.

And though everyone tells me I’m wrong — I think all the recent water main breaks in L.A. are due to the surface being compressed by slowly building pressure under L.A.


28 posted on 06/30/2015 5:35:38 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa; markomalley; SunkenCiv; blam; All

Here is another interesting article about a CA fault which may reach to the mantle. I wonder if these places are nearby or the phenomena related? Are these signs of special danger?

http://la.curbed.com/archives/2015/06/newport_inglewood_fault_deep.php


29 posted on 06/30/2015 10:39:47 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; markomalley; Raycpa; SunkenCiv; All

I just reread the intro and see that the link I just posted IS related to the same fault area.


30 posted on 06/30/2015 10:42:50 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

How so? We have a daughter in SF ... Thanks in advance.


31 posted on 07/01/2015 7:30:56 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54

Please see post 27


32 posted on 07/01/2015 7:55:14 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tunehead54

When you say “SF” do you mean San Fernando or San Francisco?

Because the fault in question poses no threat to San Francisco.


33 posted on 07/01/2015 7:56:31 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson