Posted on 06/05/2015 9:12:23 AM PDT by Morgana
“Stop claiming you’re speaking for God....”
***************************************************************************************************
I think he/she is setting him/herself up as the Benny Hinn of the anti-Duggar family jihad crowd. All sorts of falsehoods being promulgated in that jihad.
Not even the Duggars are contesting the claim that Josh is a child molester.
Not even the Duggars are contesting the claim that Josh is a child molester.
****************************************************************************************************
Actually what they do not contest, and dealt with many years ago, is that Josh, as a 13 year old child, engaged for a period of time in some inappropriate soft touching (that is the words of the sisters since the touching did not wake them up) of five girls for which he felt guilty and quickly confessed to his parents.
He is not now and NEVER HAS BEEN a child molester unless YOU have some Clintonian definition of what the meaning of the word ‘IS’ is and what the meaning of ADULT and CHILD are. You’ve had to have the meanings of words explained to you a number of times. You are embarrassing yourself by your ignorance as you post your comments as part of your anti-Duggar jihad. Please go to this link and start to educate yourself:
http://www.defending.com/child-molestation-laws
Here’s a small extract for you to read quickly:
“...According to U.S. Department Justice, child molestation is a broadly defined term which includes: contacts or interactions including inappropriate physical contact between a child and an adult when the child is being used for sexual stimulation of the perpetrator or another person when the perpetrator or another person is in a position of power or control over the victim. Sexual Molestation is a term defining offenses in which an adult engage in non-penetrative activity with a minor for the purpose of sexual gratification...”
I would not walk into a courtroom with a defendant accused of sexual molestation and present the defense, “the victim did not wake up, so therefore the molestation was not all that bad.”
Jeez, do you have an IQ in the 80s? Read AND COMPREHEND the post (that would be post #223 you are commenting on (along with the linked source material) that describes what child molestation is and IS NOT.
Going through life stupid and ignorant is not a good way to live. At least TRY to relieve some of your ignorance-—you’re making a fool of yourself.
“Actually what they do not contest, and dealt with many years ago, is that Josh, as a 13 year old child, engaged for a period of time in some inappropriate soft touching.”
Come on now, not even Josh Duggar days he “Touched” his four year old sister’s vagina when he was 13. He admits to being at least 15 years old.
And 15 year olds can and are tried as adults.
“Twelve years ago, as a young teenager I acted inexcusably for which I am extremely sorry and deeply regret,” -Josh Duggar
You are actually beyond hope with your lies and deliberate obtuseness (or extremely low IQ, whichever fits). I tire of your trolling and falsehoods.
I don’t promote or agree with any form of child molestation. However, I believe Megan Kelly’s interview was more SELF promoting and way out of proportion with heavy editing to fit her agenda.
However, I wonder how YOU act when you were 13-15 years old, hmmm? I know at that age I was very, VERY curious of the girls private parts and so were also my friends in general.
Now here is the real truth: When the Jewish Pharisees caught a woman in adultery, Jesus said: “He who are without sin cast the first stone”!!! Hmmm???
“I believe Megan Kelly’s interview was more SELF promoting and way out of proportion with heavy editing to fit her agenda.”
Were the Duggars forced to go on Megan Kelly’s show?
If not, who was doing to self promoting?
“You are actually beyond hope with your lies and deliberate obtuseness (or extremely low IQ, whichever fits). I tire of your trolling and falsehoods.”
Falsehoods?
You are the saying that Josh was 13 years old when he fondled his sisters’ vaginas.
Not even Josh is going with that distortion.
Look, I am ceasing engaging with you. IMHO you are a troll.
Regarding the Duggars, you want these Christians thrown off of their “G rated” television show and wish their son had been prosecuted.
Regarding the Waco slaughter of bikers by statist Police snipers in a combined operation with Obama’s DOJ/BATF, you think the bikers all got/are getting what they deserved (when you’re not claiming they shot one another).
Regarding the AMTRAC derailment, you support the ridiculous theory that it was caused by kids throwing rocks/bricks instead of the engineer being responsible due to negligence (or, IMHO, a possible failed German Wings pilot type of suicide attempt). Whatever we do, let’s not look at the homosexual engineer and his activities but, instead, deflect.
It’s funny how many of your posted opinions (trolling in my book) mirror those that belong to the liberal/’RAT agendanistas).
What’s next for these two lovely young ladies?
Will we be seeing them next season on “Dancing With the Stars”?
Thanks for following.
I don’t care if Josh Duggar is a Christian, Jewish or an atheist, he fondled several four or five year old girls when he was at least 14 years of age, and I will never condone, excuse or be an apologist for sexual abuse.
Until one can prove that the Waco Police conspired with the BATF to murder innocent bikers, and ballistics tests prove that all the bullets pulled out of dead people and wounded people were fired by the police, I’m going with biker shootout in parking lot.
The Amtrak guy?
He could have been texting, posting to FB, or posting to a gay site or and rock hit the train causing him to lose control. I have not seen any credible evidence that he intentionally crashed.
Show me evidence and I will consider it, but. “He is gay and therefore he intentionally crashed” is not a sound argument.
There are two police reports that have been issued — one from the Springdale Police Department, and one from the Washington County sheriff’s office. Both reports contain the initial interview with Jim Bob and Michelle. Only the Springdale Police Department’s report has interviews with other witnesses and with the victims (Washington County closed their investigation after the interview with the parents because the events occurred in the city limits).
Despite the “we’re so persecuted” claims against Springdale police chief Kathy O’Kelley, the city report had many more redactions than the Washington County report. O’Kelley didn’t release the fact the youngest victim was five and Josh 15 at the time he hurt her — given that there were four older daughters, only a very careful reading of the city’s police report pointed to the fact the oldest daughter was never targeted.
The Washington County report makes it clear that Josh confessed three times to his parents — in March 2002, July 2002, and March 2003 — to molesting young girls. Unlike what Jill said in her interview, she was not yet 11 in March of 2002 when Josh confessed to touching her in her sleep.
If this was just teenage curiosity about girls, why didn’t he go after the oldest daughter? She was the one who was 12, she was the one who was closest to puberty. Going after the younger girls suggests a predatory pattern to his behavior, and whereas most youthful sexual offenders go for older victims as they get older, his progression was to younger and younger girls.
I watched the interview with the two married daughters, and I couldn’t help but be reminded of some of the interviews with women of the FLDS when the government came in and took their children. When you’re born into a cult, and it’s the only thing you know, the outside world becomes very scary. Our condemnation is read as persecution by those who are truly brainwashed. And any group that suggests fathers who sexually abuse their daughters should be dealt with by the church instead of the cops is a cult, because anyone who actually believes that is right and just needs their head examined. (I’m more inclined to think the only part of the church that should be dealing with child molesters is the churchyard.)
Jim Bob said a couple of interesting things in the interview. The first was that Josh was a child preying on children. The second was an exchange where he said that in talking with other families (presumably their circle of friends), this was a common problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.