Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Mexico Is Fighting Obesity
Marketplace ^ | Monday, May 18, 2015 | Stan Alcorn

Posted on 05/21/2015 11:38:00 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: jespasinthru

That’s the British spelling of organization.


21 posted on 05/22/2015 2:35:08 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

America is fighting obesity with a 250 pound First Lady.


22 posted on 05/22/2015 2:38:31 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In 2009 I spent two weeks touring Mexico with a Mexican family. I watched the people with great interest and one of my observations was that the poor were not fat. Many of the wealthier were. They have Indian DNA and because Indians went through periodic famines they tend to be much more efficient about absorbing calories. (I knew one here who watched every calorie and was still overweight.) There may be lots of fat people but taxes won’t change that. It’s genetics.

Another unrelated observation; Everybody I saw looked as good as they could look. When Mexicans leave the house their shirts are tucked in, their hair is combed and they look neat and put together. People here dress like they’re shopping at Wal-Mart.


23 posted on 05/22/2015 2:43:55 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jespasinthru

*More than 1 in 3 adults are considered to be obese.
*More than 1 in 20 adults are considered to have extreme obesity.
*About one-third of children and adolescents ages 6 to 19 are considered to be overweight or obese.
*More than 1 in 6 children and adolescents ages 6 to 19 are considered to be obese.

http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/Pages/overweight-obesity-statistics.aspx

Definitions may be overly strict, of course, but those are the statistics.

Have you been to Walmart recently?


24 posted on 05/22/2015 3:44:35 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather
They have Indian DNA and because Indians went through periodic famines they tend to be much more efficient about absorbing calories.

I don't buy this theory. Until 200 years ago or so even the most advanced countries of Europe had frequent famines.

All other areas of the world even more recent.

200 years is not nearly enough to change genetic makeup.

25 posted on 05/22/2015 3:47:40 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“I don’t buy this theory.”

Europe had huge genetic diversity, which dampens out local genetic changes. The American Indians had little interbreeding. The local groups all went through the same famine and the fat-burner thin types failed to pass their genes on as often as the short fat types. The “Indians” we see in movies are either Caucasians dressed up or specially cast Indians who fit our image of what an Indian is. But the ones I’ve seen in Mexico are short and fat. I’m late to work so I’ll just say Google me wrong.


26 posted on 05/22/2015 3:55:44 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Government subsidizes corn. Corn is extremely high in fructose. Fructose is the worse sugar for weight gain...why do I have this feeling that whatever government decides to do, it will only make the problem worse?


27 posted on 05/22/2015 4:12:09 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Indians are pretty diverse.

Comanches tend to be short and fat, as do most of the Central American types. Others tended to be tall and slender. The Patagonians were referred to as giants by the first Europeans.

I agree Indians are less genetically diverse than Eurasians. Will consider looking into this more.

But it is still a fact that famines have been a constant in human history till very recently, all over the world. Moderns project the absence of them in American and European history for the last two centuries or so as if that was always the case. It wasn’t.


28 posted on 05/22/2015 5:12:11 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

https://www.activistfacts.com/person/1289-kelly-brownell/


29 posted on 05/22/2015 9:23:07 AM PDT by rolling_stone (1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

“But it is still a fact that famines have been a constant in human history till very recently, all over the world. Moderns project the absence of them in American and European history for the last two centuries or so as if that was always the case. It wasn’t.”

I realize that. We have been fantastically blessed, especially in the 20’th and so far in the 21st. All it will take to create the worst famine in all of human history is a very small nuclear war in the middle east. (My money is on Iran vs. Saudi Arabia.) Interrupt the flow of oil or even significantly raise the price and perhaps a billion people in non-blessed areas like Africa will die as never seen before.


30 posted on 05/22/2015 2:10:56 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson