Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

About that "Civilian Security Force"
5/1/2015 | EBH

Posted on 05/01/2015 4:56:21 PM PDT by EBH

A chat took place on Rush Limbaugh's show today that referenced something Obama said back in 2008 and what Sharpton reiterated a few days ago.

Obama said, "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

Sharpton said, “There must be national policy and national law on policing. We can’t go from state to state, we’ve got to have national law to protect people against these continued questions.”

I got to thinking about these two statements and started wondering if we're being played for fools.

Let's consider how they have been up arming police forces all over the country with military style equipment. How about all those big ammo purchases too. And most police are members of a union, so I am sure the democrats are garnering lots of loyalty with those fancy new toys they are handing out.

Now what about these 'riots?' We have Sharpton calling for federalizing the police. Obama started much of this unrest early on in his Presidency. Recall the beer garden meeting, Trayvon Martin, sending the DOJ to Ferguson, Cleveland, etc.

Is this administration playing both sides of the coin to generate a crisis big enough to call for federalizing the police force? Are we being community organized right into the "Civilian Security Force?"

We know there are community agitators being bussed into these cities...who are they and who is paying them to incite violence?

Have any of these officers been found guilty? And are we watching series of false flag events?


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: baltimore; blackkk; elijahcummings; maryland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Lurkinanloomin

<>Federal control of the police force gives them their police state.<>

Without doubt.

Institutions designed to secure liberty have been corrupted into serving tyranny.

Italy, Germany, Japan of the 1920s-1930s didn’t have a tradition of republican liberty. History should cut them some slack.

America deserves none.


21 posted on 05/01/2015 5:29:38 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

Ever heard of the “ Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association” ?

I stumbled across some info on it on my County Sheriffs web page.


22 posted on 05/01/2015 5:32:15 PM PDT by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EBH
These are all local/isolated incidents being blown out of proportion by a dying traditional media AND a particular group of legal-eagles vulture shyster ambulance chasers out to make a name and/or a buck for themselves.

In addition, these type of "manufactured outrage" theatrics(on a national stage)also provides a smokescreen for someone trying to "not let a crisis go to waste".

23 posted on 05/01/2015 5:38:38 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

I have seen that too, not sure how accurate that is.


24 posted on 05/01/2015 5:39:34 PM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 9thLife

“So now let’s ask, by way of discerning the end-game scenarios, why?”

Federal Judges are appointed not elected.

Create law through the courts will and not through the peoples representatives.


25 posted on 05/01/2015 5:40:06 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Even Michael Moore opines “Next demand: Disarm the police. We have a 1/4 billion 2nd amendment guns in our homes 4 protection. We’ll survive til the right cops r hired”. If even ultra-Leftist Moore doesn’t agree and is falling back on RKBA, it’s going way in the wrong direction.


26 posted on 05/01/2015 5:40:13 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Hillary:polarizing/calculating/disingenuous/insincere/ambitious/inevitable/entitled/overconfident/se)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
Photobucket
27 posted on 05/01/2015 5:49:21 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Resolution
Drafted by The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association
January 24, 2014
Pursuant to the powers and duties bestowed upon us by our citizens, the undersigned do hereby resolve that any Federal officer, agent, or employee, regardless of supposed congressional authorization, is required to obey and observe limitations consisting of the enumerated powers as detailed within Article 1 Section 8 of the U S Constitution and the Bill Of Rights.
The people of these united States are, and have a right to be, free and independent, and these rights are derived from the “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.” As such, they must be free from infringements on the right to keep and bear arms, unreasonable searches and seizures, capricious detainments and infringements on every other natural right whether enumerated or not. (9th amendment)
We further reaffirm that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” (10th amendment)
Furthermore, we maintain that no agency established by the U S Congress can develop its own policies or regulations which supersede the Bill of Rights or the Constitution, nor does the executive branch have the power to make law, overturn law or set aside law.
Therefore, in order to protect the American people, BE IT RESOLVED THAT, The following abuses will not be allowed or tolerated:
1) Registration of personal firearms under any circumstances.
2) Confiscation of firearms without probable cause, due process, and constitutionally compliant warrants
issued by a local or state jurisdiction.
3) Audits or searches of a citizen’s personal affairs or finances without probable cause, due process, and constitutionally compliant warrants issued by a local or state jurisdiction.
4) Inspections of person or property without probable cause and constitutionally compliant warrants as required by the 4th Amendment and issued by a local or state jurisdiction.
5) The detainment or search of citizens without probable cause and proper due process compliance, or the informed consent of the citizen.
6) Arrests with continued incarcerations without charges and complete due process, including, but not limited to public and speedy jury trials, in a court of state or local jurisdiction.
7) Domestic utilization of our nation’s military or federal agencies operating under power granted under the laws of war against American citizens.
8) Arrest of citizens or seizure of persons or property without first notifying and obtaining the express consent of the local sheriff.
AND, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
that the undersigned Sheriffs, Peace Officers, Public Servants and Citizens, do hereby denounce any acts or agencies which promote the aforementioned practices. All actions by the Federal Government and its agents will conform strictly and implicitly with the principles expressed within the United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights.

http://cspoa.org


28 posted on 05/01/2015 6:03:58 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

No doubt, 0bama said he wanted it.

The pieces are falling into place for it to happen. There’s some democrats in Congress also calling for some changes.


29 posted on 05/01/2015 6:04:00 PM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

ping


30 posted on 05/01/2015 6:40:02 PM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
To me, the most important point is that Sharpton is obummer’s confidant.

So you can bet that what Sharpton is saying on this subject is what he and obummer have discussed in private.

So what you really have here is a warning of what is to come, that is unless congress does something to stop it.

And that would be a bad bet.

31 posted on 05/01/2015 6:45:00 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: EBH

32 posted on 05/01/2015 6:59:30 PM PDT by SkyPilot ("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Training the military in riot control seemed weird to me when I found out about it. We need to find out when it was first introduced and put it on the McCarthy timeline.

Read here on FR that our military is not permitted to fight on US soil. So our military goes to Europe and China sends their troops here.

Time to think globally, eh?


33 posted on 05/01/2015 7:31:40 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog
"The Sheriffs would never agree to being Federalized. Not most of them, anyway."

Unless the Sheriff's Office has flat out refused to take federal monies or equipment, they have already let the camel's nose under the tent.

34 posted on 05/01/2015 7:37:35 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EBH

The likely reason al Charleton is OK with federalizing the po-po is because of the pandering of blacks by Witholder. Once a pubbie is back at the helm he will cry a different song.


35 posted on 05/01/2015 8:26:06 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

“Some of the same people.”

Look at Deray’s timeline.


36 posted on 05/01/2015 8:45:03 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Baltimore needs more Armed Koreans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EBH

National Security Nationalized Federal Police Force.

Nazi SS Gestopo.... What could go wrong, sarcasm..


37 posted on 05/01/2015 10:00:55 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (BeThe Keystone Pipe like ProjectR : build it already Congre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

The Nefarious forces will find a reason or create a crises to remove America’s sheriffs.

What happened in Baltimore was a false flag operation to introduce a Federal Nationalized Occupational Police force in the USA.

What happened in Baltimore is like the German February 27 1933 Reichstag Fire that helped usher in the Nazis into power.


38 posted on 05/01/2015 10:13:50 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (BeThe Keystone Pipe like ProjectR : build it already Congre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Echoing what many of us are thinking - the Feds are trying to wrest all the power positions from the States to negate any potential “militias”. We will outnumber them greatly, even w/o the extreme firepower they have access to, but will we actually take a stand?


39 posted on 05/02/2015 3:51:59 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

Actually, if you want the real truth, the posse comitatus doesn’t cover certain aspects of the military.

The Act covers the Army. It does not cover the Navy, Marines, National Guard, or Coastguard. While the Navy does have regulations construed similar to the act, those can be overridden by the Commander in Chief without Congressional intervention.

My point being, the Civilian Force would be taking instruction from the military. So far, they are keeping the National Guard in a support & secure role. This could change at the drop President’s order. He doesn’t need congressional authority to do it.

Also, keep in mind the NDAA emergency authorization act. As far as I know we have remained in a declared State of Emergency since 2001.

What branch of the military is carrying out activities this summer in the American Southwest under the exercise term of Jade Helm? Special Forces supposedly from all 4 branches. http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/04/29/jade-helm-15-a-military-simulation-draws-scrutiny-and-wild-speculation-in-texas/


40 posted on 05/02/2015 6:17:06 AM PDT by EBH (And the angel poured out his cup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson