Posted on 04/28/2015 5:17:11 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
By Gary P Jackson
Many long time supporters of Governor Sarah Palin, those of us who have followed her career since early 2007, a year and a half before she was to be chosen as the Republican nominee for Vice President and became an international figure, have been wondering why the Governor has been silent now that several Republicans, including her good friend Ted Cruz, have announced they are officially in for 2016. Maybe, just maybe we have our answer.
(Excerpt) Read more at thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com ...
Or Flakey Flake seat...
spoken like a true idiot! congrats.
I can see failure from my house!
Because with Cruz and Walker in the race how does she make the case she's better qualified or more conservative than either? All she will do is dilute the conservative vote and help Jeb.
Yes, I am a genius because I realize that she wont run for President. She’s had eight years to try and build momentum in her favour.
She’s still at Fox.
And you have Ted BECAUSE of Palin. Words out of his own mouth.
What a sexist thing to say.
So. The woman is “useful” for cheerleading on the men?
The woman, incidentally, who has 10 years more executive experience in public sector executive positions, no less.
Wow.
Just.
Wow.
All you “Palin should run for Senate” folks do know that Palin passed up a practically slam-dunk Senate run in Alaska in 2004, only 2 years after Daddy Murkowski gave Baby Girl Murkowski his Senate seat ... and feelings were still quite raw against Baby Girl?
You know that, right?
Palin is an executive.
Not a legislator.
Hint: Walker is a Bush RINO.
Or at least he was until he started running for President.
Look at his LOONG, lifelong, in fact, career in government. He’s very similar to fellow Wisconsin GOP Good Ol’ Boy Paul Ryan.
They’re both lifers and will do whatever the Party tells them to so they can stay in.
Given the past donation history of SarahPac, I wouldn’t count on it. In the
2014 election cycle she took in $2.8 million and gave out $205,000 to candidates.
In 2012 she took in over $5 million and gave out about $300,000.
************
Isn’t that pretty much the history of PACs?
And you’re going to give us the Leadership PAC #s for other prominent Republicans, too, now, aren’t you?
Because giving us SarahPAC’s #s in a vacuum means nothing.
Ab.so. lute. ly. nothing.
Waiting for the #s on other PACS ...
Still waiting ...
Walker is losing Wisconsin BADLY.
Walker will lose Wisconsin and most other blue states.
Just as Romney did.
Just as Romney lost Massachusetts even with himself on the ticket.
Just as he lost Wisconsin even with Paul Ryan on the ticket.
Blue state Republicans DO NOT win national elections.
If you think that Walker is more conservative than Palin than you know nothing about Walker ... or Palin.
Walker is the GOP’s man in Wisconsin. He’s the lifer Good Ol Boy best bud of the Bush/Rockefeller/Dewey GOP.
Do. some. research.
Farther back than December 2014.
Conservatives don’t believe in the isms.
She’s not running.
True, and she did a remarkable job as governor. But right now she's out in the wilderness.
I doubt if she'll be running for any executive office again. But her voice needs to be heard, and it needs to be heard on an official level. So the Senate seems to be a decent option, perhaps the only option.
Here's another way to look at it. Would the lib's rather have Palin where she is now, or have her in the US Senate?
Sorry Sarah, Ted is my candidate. The media ruined you and you didn’t fight back.
Nonsense.
I'm pretty sure Sarah would win North Dakota.
>>> Isn’t that pretty much the history of PACs?
Pretty much, which is why I always suggest giving to candidates directly. PACs are essentially funding mechanisms for the consultant class.
>>> And you’re going to give us the Leadership PAC #s for other prominent Republicans, too, now, aren’t you?
If you can give me the names of the PACs, I would be happy to spend a couple of minutes researching and posting. Of course you could do it yourself. It’s all ready available on opensecrets.org
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.