Posted on 04/28/2015 1:30:17 AM PDT by Swordmaker
I don’t have an Apple Watch yet. I’ve ordered one, and through some combination of demand and short supply, I probably won’t see it until sometime in June. But I’m only getting the Watch because I need to stay up on what Apple is doing—and what Microsoft is doing on Apple’s platforms—and I don’t recommend that readers waste money on this first generation gadget. And that’s because you don’t need to see or own an Apple Watch to understand its many deficiencies.
What amazes me most about Apple Watch is the free press Apple gets for creating something with so many problems. Consider the article Apple Watch Has Landed — Here’s What You Need to Know, which I saw on the front page of the digital edition of The New York Times last week. Here are the several points “you need to know.”
The Watch may take some time to understand. Even Apple lover Farhad Manjoo required “three long, often confusing and frustrating days” to get acclimated to this unnecessary and expensive accessory.
You run Apple Watch apps with an iPhone. “The Apple Watch requires an iPhone to fully operate, partly because the brains of apps will live on the iPhone.” So it’s not a standalone device, like a fitness wearable that costs much, much less.
A few stores are selling the Watch. “They will be sold out by the time you get there … Apple doesn’t expect to sell watches directly inside Apple retail stores before June.” That kind of makes you want it more, doesn’t it?
The Apple Watch is something you should probably try before buying. “You’ll want to see how the watch feels on your wrist and looks with your outfit.” Let us know if you need some privacy for that.
Apple Watch comes in different flavors. “There are three different models sold at different prices, and the bands are interchangeable.” Actually, they’re not interchangeable, unless you stick with bands made for your sized device (there are two sizes). Good luck finding what you want in the size you need at the Apple Store you’re standing in.
So here’s the thing. Most of those things “you need to know” are fairly ridiculous limitations. And I want you to imagine The New York Times recommending this level of patience and time acclimating to any Samsung device, or any Microsoft device, no matter how beautiful. You can’t do it. Because it would never happen. Had Apple Watch been made by any company other than Apple, we wouldn’t be even having this discussion. And the New York Times wouldn’t be writing about it at all.
And I think that’s what bothers me.
Sure, the Apple Watch is superfluous, an unnecessary accessory that literally no one needs. Sure, it’s expensive, as are most Apple products. Yes, it promotes even more lock-in to the Apple ecosystem, since it requires a (new model) iPhone. And yes, it’s not even a standalone product (for the same reason). The battery life is terrible. The build quality is beautiful, but like most Apple products it is also easily breakable, something we have to suspect by now is literally a design goal for a company that relies on its customers buying and rebuying the same products every year, or two, or three.
But it’s not any of that stuff.
I understand, even accept, that Apple hardware purchases involve most of the points made above and that most fans of the company simply don’t care or are essentially pushing their fingers into their ears and going “na-na-na-na” so they can’t hear the logic of the argument against their buying decisions. I am at peace with this.
But the thing about the Apple Watch is that it transcends the normal Apple complaints and even the normal Apple accolades. It’s not intuitive, because you really need to train yourself to use it. It’s not simple to buy, and for a wide variety of reasons. It’s not obviously better than anything else in the market.
And yet here’s the New York Times, and others, simply overlooking this nonsense and giving you all the information you need to just plow ahead, throw several hundred dollars at Apple anyway, and take up your valuable times—days of it—to learn how to use something you don’t even need.
This bothers me. And I know that this will make the Apple guys nuts. I’m sorry. I really am. But maybe I don’t need to stay up on what Apple’s doing in this case. I could save myself $400—as I recommend you do—and just skip it. Apple Watch is beautiful, it really is. But it just seems so pointless.
And yes, I bet the next Apple Watch will be amazing. And I’m sure Apple will get it right, and define this category. I’m equally sure that when they do so, its fans will point at this article and try to reverse-engineer them being right about the device back in 2015. I’m at peace with that too.
If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.
I challenge the members of the Apple ping list to each donate at least $10 each to the latest Freepathon. I HAVE donated $100. Many members of the Apple Ping list are already rising to the challenge. Join them. Let's show the power of the Apple Ping list in supporting Freerepublic!
in short, don’t buy it.
AppleCrapple
Crux of his verbosity: “It’s not intuitive, because you really need to train yourself to use it. It’s not simple to buy, and for a wide variety of reasons. It’s not obviously better than anything else in the market.”
Has he tried one? I did, it’s intuitive.
Yes it’s as simple to buy as any mail order.
There’s nothing else like it on the market.
Thanks for posting this.
So did the writer just order one to give himself “credibility”? Bogus article. the surveys from the pre-order period showed that people who were not convinced that went to Apple stores for the try-on appointments always left with an order.
My wife has one. It is intuitive, powerful, and very well made. The naysayers will be like the naysayers before iPad or iPhone. When everyone around you has one, you eventually will consider it. Once you have gotten over your irrational hate for a corporate entity, if you can afford one, you will buy one.
My only hesitation in ordering an Apple Watch is over whether to wait for the next generation.
I probably won’t.
I’ll probably wait until someone has convincingly made a watch which communicates via cell phone, without a separate cell phone.
I probably will wait. Maybe a year or so. (which is how long I estimate before someone convincingly creates such a competitor)
Whether it’s from Apple, or a competitor. You might get a new customer Apple.
Might.
The Apple Watch has some forward looking tech built into it. For instance, it has some hardware that is not currently being used. That indicates that the refresh cycle may be longer than we have seen with iPhone or iPad - update by software only.
Donning my asbestos plate carrier (pitchforks-n-torches, ya know) suit for the inevitable Appleusian attack over daring do disparage Mother Apple. Heehee.. d;^)
You do know that the watch is made in Asia.
lol... my sympathies.
Hey wanting to bring jobs back to America doesn’t mean I don’t buy stuff.
Heck I’ve lived in Asia.
Don’t get me wrong.
That may disappoint some people. I am just saying we need to bring jobs back to America.
That is something we need to work on. As a nation.
Sounds like if he was any more “at peace”, he’d be dead.
By communist slave labour.
Apple is da debbil!
+1.
When evaluating such gizmos, I use a “buck a day” rule of thumb: if it’s something I’m actually going to use daily, and the expected usage period averages out to $1/day or less, then it’s a no-brainer “yes, get it”.
I’ve ordered the $400 gray sport version. I could easily see using one for two years before upgrading (comparison: I got the first iPad just 30 minutes after release, then waited until the iPad 4 to upgrade), so $1/day easily justifies $730 for a nice version (only reason I didn’t is my wife would kill me). Sure, you can wait for the second model to arrive to get a Watch...but then you’d miss out on having one _this_ year for just $1/day.
Apple is working on it. Mac Pro and other products are made domestically.
The problem isn’t the businesses, it’s the laws that require high costs that can’t compete.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.