he bet on his own team to win, not lose... i see no conflict of interest no matter what the law says
Posted on 03/16/2015 5:01:01 PM PDT by Beave Meister
I think he’ll get in, he just won’t be alive to see it when it happens.
:-)
Most definitely.
They let Ty Cobb in.
“Once he has completed his sentence, which he agreed to, then he can be eligible for the hall.”
Am I missing something? According to the article, “he agreed to a permanent ban from baseball”.
Rose, 73, played from 1963 to 1986, amassing 4,256 hits, still a major league record. Three years after he retired, Rose agreed to a permanent ban from baseball amid accusations he gambled on games while playing and managing for the Cincinnati Reds.
Not a Reds fan. They beat the Yanks in 76...no destroyed them...and I’m a huge Yankees fan. BUT. The Reds deserved it. What a great team the Big Red Machine was back in the day. And Pete Rose was friggin fantastic....Charlie Hustle.....never be another like him.
As I remember it, it is a lifetime ban. If a truly permanent ban, then no, he should not ever be in the Hall.
Also, the first sentence refers to it as a lifetime ban.
He will have to come clean which he should have done originally and he would likely already be forgiven.
He will have to come clean which he should have done originally and he would likely already be forgiven.
He will have to come clean which he should have done originally and he would likely already be forgiven.
Unless Pete’s got one foot on a banana peel and the other in a grave, let him stay banned.
If he’s going to die in a few days, then consider lifting the ban, have the Hall of Fame ballots at the ready, do the induction and at least let him expire with pride.
But for now, he needs to face the consequences of some very bad choices.
They let Babe Ruth and Ernie Banks in too. What’s your point? Are you suggesting Ty Cobb was caught betting on baseball while he played or managed....on his own team none the less?
The rule is Bull Crap especially since he wasn’t accused of gambling while he played.....he earned his HOF during his playing career.
Mickey Mantle was banned from baseball during a period that he was a greeter at Atlantic city. George Steinbrenner had dealings with gamblers and was banned for a few years.
Rose’s accomplishments had nothing to do with gambling.....ban him from the Hall as a manager....but not as a players
Willie Mays Aikens went to fed prison and returned to baseball.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willie_Aikens
Hmm, I believe I may stand corrected, if Wikipedia is correct:
“However, Giamatti granted Rose one concession: Rose could apply for reinstatement once a year for as long as he lived after ten years. Rose has subsequently applied for reinstatement four times; all four reinstatement requests have been rejected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_banned_from_Major_League_Baseball
I still don’t think he deserves it. He knew the rule.
“The rule is Bull Crap especially since he wasn’t accused of gambling while he played.....he earned his HOF during his playing career.”
The rule applied to managers, too. A lifetime ban from baseball is pretty specific, doesn’t warn just the players.
The citation at my previous post certainly opens the door, didn’t know that before.
I’m figuring if they let Pete Rose in, they have to let Shoeless Joe in, and all the ‘Roiders, too.
But I don’t believe Rose deserves it. He knew the rule and admitted everything in the Dowd Report to be true.
I’m not going to lose sleep or argue about it, though.
he bet on his own team to win, not lose... i see no conflict of interest no matter what the law says
“I bet on my team every night. I didn’t bet on my team four nights a week. I was wrong,” Rose said.
EVERY NIGHT. Are you kidding me. You think that’s alright. So you believe the rules should not apply to everyone. The best players, the superstars do not have to obey those silly rules like gambling on games. Only the journey men stiffs have to respect the rules.
When the Scum bag White Sox (Oh BTW I’m a Cubs fan) threw the 1919 World Series they destroyed baseballs credibility for years. The then Commissioner of Baseball Judge Mountain Landis banned almost every Sox player in that series. Shoeless Joe Jackson was banned for life. Even though Jackson refused to take any money and had an outstanding series himself. He knew about it and said nothing. He is still banned from baseball.
I don’t know if he should go into the Hall posthumously, but he shouldn’t go in while he’s still breathing. I don’t want to see him capitalize from this honor.
Actually, that is a good way to put it. It is a honor to be in the Hall, and he dishonored the game by violating one of the rules posted in every club house.
Yes, other people have dishonored the game, and some may be in the Hall. But bad behavior of others is not a viable defense. He knew what he did, and accepted the sentence. By his admission, he dishonored the game, and made himself unworthy of its highest honor.
I guess why I get so riled up about this is that he belonged to one of the best teams in baseball when I was a kid. But now, instead of talking about how great the combined talent on the Big Red Machine was, it is “Pete Rose” this, and “Pete Rose” that. He may have been Charlie Hustle, but it was for his own benefit, and not in the spirit of team. I may be old-fashioned in my belief, but his attitude that he is bigger than the game rankles me.
Also, I still believe that he is not contrite, he is just sorry that he was caught.
Well, I have wasted enough of the forum’s and my time with this rant, but that’s what I think about the subject. YMMV.
Here’s a little fun fact for you. Bart Giamatti’s son is actor Paul Giamatti.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.