LOL!
Kook Alert!
Posted on 02/23/2015 12:02:59 PM PST by Windflier
It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Presidential Library" about his early years, when he is out of office.
In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't seem odd that there's so little we know about our current president, Barack Obama.
For example, we know that Andrew Jackson's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano.
As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president.
We are all aware of the lack of uncontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful.
There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue.
One other unusual item... there are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found?
It is strange that no one who ever dated him has shown up. The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would, in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself. We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess. Joe Biden's aneurisms and hair plugs are no secret; look at Cheney and Clinton, we know about their heart problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known. That's why it's so odd, that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was so-oo shy..." or "What a great dancer..."
It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow.
Who was the best man at his wedding? Start there. Then check groomsmen.
Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony. Has anyone talked to the professors? It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him.
When did he meet Michele, and how? Are there photos? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library. What has he released? And who in hell voted for him to be the most popular man in 2010? Doesn't this make you wonder?
Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from President Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend and so on?
Not one person has ever come forward from his past.
It certainly is very, very intriguing.
This should be a cause for great concern. To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man. Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate"
As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face, someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us.
George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign. He questions why no one has acknowledged the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984. He says he never had a single class with him.
If he is such a great orator, why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records?
Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University.
Looking for evidence of Obama's past, Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him.
Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a Political Science major at Columbia, who also graduated in 1983. In 2008, Root said of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever."
Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him. At the class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class? Me. No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the class notes, who's kind of, as we say in New York , 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet to find a person, a human who ever met him."
Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia.
Some other interesting questions:
Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002? It is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam.
Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order? We understand that was forced, in order to avoid criminal fraud charges.
It is circulating that, according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama, but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 aliases connected to him.
The Social Security number he uses now, originated in Connecticut, where he is never reported to have lived. It was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there.
As we all know, Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not re-used'
No wonder all his records are sealed!
I was merely conceding your point that birth certificates indicate the race of the parents, not the child.
But isn't it strange that Obama's says his father is African. That is a nationality and not a race.
Yes, and it's a glaring red flag that Obama's COLB is totally fraudulent. The word, "African", on that document is as bad as the superscript on Dan Rather's forged docs re: George Bush.
Will let's see, you want me to prove my theory without having to prove your theory, over photos that I cannot post because they'll be deleted by the mods, while dismissing (as absurd) the very concept that the government might be doctoring photos to hide evidence that the President may have once had brain surgery, because they simply wouldn't ever try to hide such a thing or confuse the evidence for it.
Just want to make your proposal clear here.
Hmm, let's see, what to do.
I know, I'll just say this (again): I think those are scars on Obama's head, and not parted hair marks perceptible only to black people with personal experience in nappy hair behavior that is simply unknown to white people.
That's it, that's what I'm doing, right there - I'm saying that.
Oh, and I'll say one more thing. I don't think the NSA is handling the photo evidence manipulation on the Obama head scar coverup mission. If I were to choose, I'd say that would fall to the NASA photo manipulators that faked the moon landings. Because in the same way they used the same background hills for all the faked moon photos, they're using the same background head for these faked nappy hair combing swirl lines. Gives it away right there, IMO.
LOL!
Kook Alert!
I sincerely hope that you’ve been pulling my leg all this time. If not, this thread is fixin’ to be all kinda fun.
obumpa
Nope, I was only joking about the NASA moon hoax pictures, because they assembled those fake photos by hand. In contrast, the Obama photo fakers use Photoshop to erase his scars.
Big tech difference.
This is hopeless. If you're determined to believe the 'scar' meme, despite the simple evidence and logic I posed to you, then be my guest.
Logic? LOL, Obama doesn't even brush his hair - it's far too short for that whether he's black, white, purple or green - there's your "evidence." And the scars are totally obvious as scars. You talk utter nonsense and demand it be accepted as straight - you're brazenly insulting to the intelligence of everyone who reads your words.
You think what you're doing is just a technique, but it's not - it's deeply wrong. You treat people with contempt and think it doesn't touch you, doesn't change you inside.
But it does.
Good grief. With every post you make on this, you're demonstrating your utter ignorance and inability to process simple logic, facts, and reason.
I told you in a couple of previous posts that I have roughly the same genetic background as BHO. Because of that, I'm intimately familiar with his sort of hair. Many people in my family possess the exact same grade, as well as countless other black people I've known in this life.
Blacks with short kinky hair do brush it, despite your nonsensical claim to the contrary. When they do, it doesn't behave the same way that short straight hair does. If it's brushed in one direction, it stays that way. It doesn't return to its natural growth position, as short straight hair does. If you brush two sections of that sort of hair in two different directions, it will create a part that stays put until you apply a brush to take it out.
- you're brazenly insulting to the intelligence of everyone who reads your words.
I'm insulting your intelligence? No, I'm speaking from personal observation and experience, while proving my point with simple logic and reason. What I'm NOT doing, is presenting some wild assed, cockamamie conspiracy theory, that can't be proved.
In addition to my personal life observations, I also asked you:
1. Why don't Obama's alleged 'scars' don't show up in every single photo of him?
2. Why do new 'scars' seem to show up in photos, then magically disappear in other shots of the same area of his scalp?
3. Why have we never seen two photos taken of him at different times, which show the exact same 'scar', in the exact same position?
Your answer to those simple questions was a blubbering excuse about government re-touchers air brushing the 'scars' away. Do you not understand that that is simple conjecture on your part, and not even terribly believable by any mature, well-informed, thinking adult?
Do you not realize that your explanation only covers official government controlled photos of the man? Are you incapable of grasping the fact that thousands of photos of Obama have been taken by private citizens, and are posted online?
Do you really think that your alleged government re-touchers have the means and wherewithal to track down every single online image of Obama and edit out his 'scars' before those photos are shared hundreds of thousands of times?
You're grasping at straws here. You're falling through space because your theory leaves you no solid ground to stand on. In the meantime, you're screaming at me because I'm pointing out the obvious, which blows apart something you're desperate to believe in.
Well, sorry, but facts is facts, logic is logic, and I can't un-know what I know about black hair.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.