Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Snowstorm Fiasco OUGHT to be a Lesson to OPPOSE the Nanny State [Don't waste a crisis!]
1/27/15 | sff

Posted on 01/27/2015 9:04:41 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

Looking at the glorious NON-EVENT that was this BS blizzard, I ask that we conservatives teach our friends how to see the dangers of the nanny state.

Think about it....media, politicians and "scientists" in the government all worked together to SHUT DOWN commerce, freedom of movement, etc.

I know this would be easy to let them off the hook and say "Well, they did their best, better safe than sorry, etc."

I think, however, that this splendidly demonstrates that these entities think of themselves as overlords who KNOW better than their citizenry how to conduct themselves in a potential crisis.

I grew up where schools shut down if the weather was REALLY REALLY bad, but NEVER did we have a governor threaten us with arrest or tell us to not open our business.

The American pioneers would laugh in the face of Cuomo, Malloy, Christie, and the rest. We should too.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: nanny; overreach
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Alberta's Child
Euro model, predicted versus actual:

Forecasters such as Joe Bastardi have noted for some time an eastward bias to the GFS. This time the GFS had it right. Folks are pretending that nothing major happened with this storm. Tell that to my friends southwest of Boston who have 30 inches of snow to shovel.

41 posted on 01/27/2015 9:43:13 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

The Canadians are storming Juno beach on the AHC this moment.


42 posted on 01/27/2015 9:43:31 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Soooo...I am expected to depend upon the government to tell me how to survive?

My point isn’t that bad storms come and go. Of course they do. My point is that liberty means we can figure out for ourselves how to survive....the men and women of the 18th and 19th centuries had no infrastructure in a modern sense, and faced dangerous conditions.

They were able to get by without governors threatening them....we can, too.


43 posted on 01/27/2015 9:43:59 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Good post.


44 posted on 01/27/2015 9:45:07 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
'Looking at the glorious NON-EVENT that was this BS blizzard'

Location, location, location. Mass, and other parts of Ne would disagree. Weather is well, weather.

45 posted on 01/27/2015 9:47:13 AM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Try reading up on the history of when large numbers of motorists were caught on highways in bad storms and get back to us.


46 posted on 01/27/2015 9:47:42 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Soooo...I am expected to depend upon the government to tell me how to survive?

No. Your government will tell you to stay off the road so you aren't a threat to the health and safety of your fellow citizens.

My point is that liberty means we can figure out for ourselves how to survive....the men and women of the 18th and 19th centuries had no infrastructure in a modern sense, and faced dangerous conditions.

Great -- then let's start by taking away the infrastructure. Let's go out and dig up every mile of highway you use to travel these days, along with the electrical infrastructure and gas mains. Then we won't have to worry about governors threatening anyone ... because the governors won't have any way to get in touch with you anyway.

Maybe I'm the only one who finds it ironic -- and comical -- for someone to sit there and post messages on the internet about how we should all live like we did back when Little House on the Prairie was a life story instead of a TV show.

P.S. When the men and women of the 18th and 19th centuries ran into serious trouble, they had no qualms about calling on their government to help them out. You don't think Pa Ingalls and the other settlers in the Dakota Territory chased all the Indians off the Great Plains by themselves, did you?

47 posted on 01/27/2015 9:50:36 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Poser

I think I didn’t express myself right. My apologies.

I am NOT bashing government for being prepared to clear roads, close schools, etc. That is a legitimate activity.

I am only trying to put out the idea that government is often quite wrong and the resilience and ability of the citizenry to take care of themselves is too often ignored.

If I look out the door and see 4 feet of snow, I am staying home. If I get a call from my neighbor two miles down the road telling me his streets are clear, I might try to work my way out.

Point is, this is none of the government’s business.


48 posted on 01/27/2015 9:55:10 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
the men and women of the 18th and 19th centuries had no infrastructure in a modern sense, and faced dangerous conditions.

They were able to get by without governors threatening them....we can, too.

This is a horrible analogy. There were no automobiles. There were not millions of people living in cold-weather cities like Buffalo, Cleveland, Chicago, etc. There was zero way for government officials to communicate quickly with citizens.

49 posted on 01/27/2015 9:57:53 AM PST by gdani (Ebola exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Star Traveler
The weathermen do good around here and I listen to their forecasts of an arriving snowstorm or blizzard, or high winds or tornadoes, etc. I don’t know why you wouldn’t because a century ago, you would have had no idea what was about to hit you, before it was right on top of you!

I can remember quite a while ago when I was a kid living in Boston, going to the Upham's corner theater for a double feaure.
Walking in at noon and getting out about 3:30 PM in the middle of an unforecast Noreast snow storm.
Bus transportation was stopped and I had to walk home in the snowstorm.

The 38 Hurricane was the same way- unforecast. - tom

50 posted on 01/27/2015 10:00:27 AM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse U.S. citizens and Americans. They are not necessarily the same. -tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
I am NOT bashing government for being prepared to clear roads, close schools, etc. That is a legitimate activity.

Now try doing that with tens of thousands of abandoned, immovable cars clogging up the traffic lanes.

51 posted on 01/27/2015 10:01:47 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Are you posting from Florida, or up here in the Northeast?

Your general sentiment is fine, and would be applicable in most cases here in the NYC and Boston areas that are dominated by nanny-state leftists.

But that has nothing to do with an overbearing government telling people what to do for their own personal safety. Every public announcement I've heard in the last 36 hours related to this storm involved telling motorists to stay off roads and warning people that public transit was going to be shut down for 12-24 hours. The only things remotely close to a "nanny state" warning about personal well-being were the warnings about being prepared for power outages.

If I look out the door and see 4 feet of snow, I am staying home. If I get a call from my neighbor two miles down the road telling me his streets are clear, I might try to work my way out.

And if you send your kids to a "nanny-state" public school, the first thing you'll have to figure out is whether the schools are open or not. Right?

52 posted on 01/27/2015 10:01:52 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

That’s worth remember too. Just because NYC didn’t get crushed doesn’t mean it wasn’t a bad storm and other places aren’t under the snow. We had that here last year, weather service was predicting a massive rain storm coming up from Baja and flooding Tucson and Phoenix. Turns out the storm “leaned” East, everybody in Tucson and Phoenix were all “where’s our end of the world flood” meanwhile Sierra Vista and other small towns in that area took some serious damage. Both turned out to be pretty much the storm predicted, just not centered in the “right” spots.


53 posted on 01/27/2015 10:03:16 AM PST by discostu (The albatross begins with its vengeance A terrible curse a thirst has begun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Like this:


54 posted on 01/27/2015 10:06:32 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Like this:

PFFFT! Obviously none of the Government's business.

55 posted on 01/27/2015 10:10:28 AM PST by gdani (Ebola exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: dirtboy

1960s.?


57 posted on 01/27/2015 10:14:08 AM PST by moose07 (The Camels have reached the parking lot. Shields up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: moose07

Blizzard of 78 in MA. Textbook example of what happens when motorists are caught out on highways in such conditions.


58 posted on 01/27/2015 10:16:14 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
OK, genius, YOU go and clear highways in such a state.

It was sarcasm. I grew up in the Cleveland area.

That is, I know full well what happens when idiots try to drive in large amounts of snow & on icy roads. And they do & will. Resulting in police & fire departments having to risk their lives because people refuse to act responsibly.

59 posted on 01/27/2015 10:17:39 AM PST by gdani (Ebola exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Unfortunately some of us seem to have a knee-jerk reaction about this subject. Closing public roads during a snowstorm so that they can be cleared in an effective manner is actually a rare example of government actually doing something that is useful and in the best interests of the taxpayers.

OK, so NYC proper missed the bulk of the storm. Very good. That's why roads were re-opened this morning and as a result, they are plowed to the pavement and the driving is safe. Up in Boston, where they are getting hammered, public roads are still closed. When the storm is over, the citizens will have safe roads to drive upon.

That's why I pay my taxes.

And you, as a citizen of Florida (based on your screen name), can certainly appreciate the evacuations that occur when a hurricane is threatening your area. Or are you insinuating that if a category 1 or 2 hurricane was approaching Miami, that we should keep I-95 open during the storm and not bother to evacuate.

60 posted on 01/27/2015 10:19:57 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson