To have a random mutation to be favored by natural selection to become a past on in a genetic trait, it must be used so that brain capacity had to be used to give an advantage
So it should be proven scientific fact that we really use near the full capacity of our brain instead this old fib we use only 10 to 15 percent ...
even it we use 50 60 % of our brain it would not seem to fit with Darwinian natural selection evolution unless unless that one time we use the full capacity and then got stupider and just quit using it
just looking for some scientific fact what is the actual use of our brain capacity.. should be in 80’ 90 % area
... and FYI ....I'm not using this as an argument for intelligent design.... one does not have to be in favor of intelligent design to point out questions about Darwinian evolution
There are many things in the universe that neither intelligently designed nor evolved...
“So it should be proven scientific fact that we really use near the full capacity of our brain instead this old fib we use only 10 to 15 percent ...”
Ah, I see what you are getting at there. Well, I think maybe the whole thing is framed in an ambiguous way. People talk about “capacity” or “potential”, but our brains aren’t like a bucket we fill up and can check where the level is at. So maybe we are just thinking about it all wrong.
We know that our brain is always making new connections and can adapt to some amazing degrees, so maybe we have to ask “is there a limit to how far we can push our brain?”