If a dozen banks identified him as a guy who robbed their bank, then yeah, he probably would be a bank robber.
Yea, it's normal for banks to wait 30 or 40 years to mention that they've been robbed.
What if they only reported the bank robbery 30 or more years after it allegedly happened - right after the alleged perp said that politicians who befriend banks are lawless thugs?
what if they say they didn’t report it at the time because 30 years ago they didn’t think the bank had been robbed, and couldn’t convince their accountants or the cops that the bank had been robbed?