Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interstellar' review
theverge ^ | October 27, 2014 | Josh Dzieza

Posted on 10/27/2014 11:38:50 AM PDT by dennisw

Directed by Christopher Nolan (Memento, Inception, the most recent Batman trilogy) and written with his brother and frequent collaborator Jonathan, Interstellar takes place in a near future that harkens back to the recent past — like the 1950s Midwest or maybe the Dust Bowl, but with laptops and drones. There’s very little exposition; through telling details and offhand comments, you get the sense that there’s been an environmental disaster followed by a famine, and that humanity has scaled back its ambitions to bare subsistence. People farm corn — the one crop left unravaged by blight — watch baseball games in half-empty stands, and flee towering haboob dust storms announced by air raid sirens.

Matthew McConaughey plays Cooper, a NASA pilot who has turned to farming — like everyone else at the time, an odd cut to faux-documentary footage informs us. He lives in a ramshackle house, complaining to his father (John Lithgow) about humanity’s diminished horizons and doting on his daughter Murph, played by Mackenzie Foy with a believably teenage mix of mischief and exasperation.

McConaughey eventually leaves Foy and Earth behind to scout out a new home for for the human race, but it’s their relationship that grounds the movie. As action-filled as Nolan’s films are, they can sometimes feel abstract, like symbolic sublimations of some offscreen mental trauma. So many of his characters get their motivation from some prior loss — the dead wives from Memento and Inception, the dead parents of Batman — that they then work through according to the game-like rules Nolan excels at, whether those rules are imposed by amnesia, consciousness, or a supervillain. But Foy is an actual character, not a cipher, and the relationship between her and McConaughey gives the film an emotional heft that Nolan’s other work sometimes lacks.

(Excerpt) Read more at theverge.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cinema; film; interstellar; movies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2014 11:38:50 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Some more of this review:

The biggest danger the shuttle crew faces, however, is time. Time isn’t just running out — it’s compressing and stretching as they travel through space. The Nolans use relativity to create some original and urgent crises as the shuttle crew figures out how to best spend their shifting time. Time is a resource, like food or water, Hathaway warns. The time differential between the crew and those they left behind also gives rise to the movie’s most melancholy scenes. In this respect it feels less like Space Odyssey and more like Homer’s Odyssey, with McConaughey getting detained and delayed as time passes and things go wrong back home.

As in 2001, things get trippy toward the end. Without revealing too much, I can say that after a series of mostly comprehensible events, it swerves into either deeply theoretical physics or sentimental spirituality. Possibly both. The shift is jarring, but also visually interesting enough that I mostly went with it.


2 posted on 10/27/2014 11:39:48 AM PDT by dennisw (The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

another eco-wacko film... yay... :p


3 posted on 10/27/2014 11:43:50 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Have you ever seen any eco movie that wasn’t wacko?


4 posted on 10/27/2014 11:48:53 AM PDT by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It sounds very not interesting.


5 posted on 10/27/2014 11:51:55 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Like everything Hollywood, no doubt a festering overgrown swamp of scientific inaccuracies.


6 posted on 10/27/2014 11:52:49 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
Have you ever seen any eco movie that wasn’t wacko?

"Silent Running"?

7 posted on 10/27/2014 11:53:38 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are not inclined to commit crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Matthew McConaughey plays

I stopped reading right there.

I will definitely watch this, but I will be sure to steal it using BitTorrent.

8 posted on 10/27/2014 11:55:03 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them. We have no 'news media', only a Soviet Pravda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Politics aside....the earth could potentially become hostile to human life. This movie is just another apocalyptic scenario. Will there be some PC environmental message to it? Probably. If the people behind the movie are smart, they will not be obvious about it.


9 posted on 10/27/2014 11:56:59 AM PDT by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededication to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

I’m not familiar with that movie. There are a number of freepers that believe any eco movie Hollywood puts out, is going to be wacko.


10 posted on 10/27/2014 11:58:19 AM PDT by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

I read the review, and it seems like I’ve seen this movie before. Oh! Yeah! THELMA AND LOUISE.


11 posted on 10/27/2014 12:05:26 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

As long as we reject cheap energy and refuse to use GMO food, a disaster is certainly possible.


12 posted on 10/27/2014 12:06:01 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts

that was super wacko


13 posted on 10/27/2014 12:06:57 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: southernmann

You’ve never seen “Silent Running?” It’s the movie where Bruce Dern first lost his mind.


14 posted on 10/27/2014 12:07:07 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: southernmann
Those movies are all way too literal and preachy-like everyone in the audience is 12 years old!

They all copy one another and I am tired of it.

15 posted on 10/27/2014 12:08:08 PM PDT by SMARTY ("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

I don’t recall seeing it. I’ll look it up.


16 posted on 10/27/2014 12:12:00 PM PDT by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: southernmann

This was the 70s. The plants were dead due to overpopulation. That was the “in” thing then.


17 posted on 10/27/2014 12:12:27 PM PDT by Ingtar (Is this the Ebola and rumors of Ebola mentioned in the Bible?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

The 70s are sort of fuzzy for me. I remember what I did, but not much about how I thought.


18 posted on 10/27/2014 12:13:55 PM PDT by southernmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: southernmann

There was also that global cooling and coming ice age thing.


19 posted on 10/27/2014 12:14:50 PM PDT by Ingtar (Is this the Ebola and rumors of Ebola mentioned in the Bible?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

how many limousine “I got mine” liberals are zpg worshipers? (zero population growth.

We should name them. I think Bloomberg and gates are in that group.


20 posted on 10/27/2014 12:17:35 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson