Posted on 10/22/2014 6:38:16 AM PDT by C19fan
The U.S. Navy is slowly preparing the first of its massive, 15,500-ton Zumwalt-class stealth destroyers for sea next year. But questions remain about many of the technologies onboard the new ships. First and foremost: can the thing even stay afloat?
The vessel—which is the largest American surface warship since the 1950s--brings a new untried “tumblehome” hull design, new power systems and gun technology that have not been used on a modern warship before. The ship is highly automated with a crew of just 142 -- compared to older ships that have a complement of about 300. But despite its massive size, the stealthy warship appears on an enemy’s sensors as something no larger than a small fishing boat.
(Excerpt) Read more at thedailybeast.com ...
no kidding
The Nimitz Class, with a full load displacement of 97,000 tonne, is the world’s largest aircraft carrier.
You MUST be kidding me? Who were the engineers on this project? A bunch of Head Start graduates? The winner of the National Milk Carton Sailboat regatta? A Harvard graduate?
The writer is making like he had never heard or seen an electric motor. Typical modern “journalist”.
Yeah, that caught my eye, too. The Nuclear Subs and Aircraft carriers are not directly attacked to the reactors.
Are they electric powered?
I know modern trains use Diesel to generate electricity that powers electric motors. This isn’t new.
attached, not attacked. need more coffee.
First and foremost: can the thing even stay afloat?
...
What’s important is that all the contractor, cronies and lobbyists made a fortune.
sensationalistic, anti-military, daily beast article that isn’t well written nor well researched.
Since when are 6" guns 'massive'?
Yet another historically illiterate journalist.
1. Float.
2. Float upright.
3. Float upright after a hurricane and battle damage.
The rest of the piece is pure liberal attack mode garbage.
Whew. I’m feeling much better.
Actually, I seem to remember some rather bothersome outcomes in the Coast Guard’s Deepwater Vessel developments....something about hulls breaking or could break or something like that. So this, to me, wouldn’t automatically be relegated to ‘wooden ship’ problems.
Since when are 6" guns 'massive'?
18 inch guns on the Yamato were massive!
I’ve heard it said there are only two kinds of ships. Submarines and targets.
I went to MIT, an actual engineering school. We referred to Harvard as “that other school in town”.
Submarines are not ships, they're boats (at least to the bubbleheads).
The plan was cancelled because the cost of keeping a BB in service was deemed too expensive ( maintenance, upgrades, and crew) Yet those numbers pale when you look at the tens of billions we're spending now..or the cost of sending a Tomahawk to kill an ISIL truck.
Imagine the New Jersey in the Med, lobbing salvos of 16" shells onto ISIL camps...there would soon be a big shortage of virgins..
Regarding the Zumwalt class, I have heard much criticism to suggest that a crew that size (150) cannot possibly provide sufficient damage control personnel in a ship that size (15,000 tons) I'd welcome your comments on that aspect of the ship's viability.
We should build some towable 16” gun barges. Pull them to the battle zone and wham!
Could we take some of the 16” guns off of some of the old decommissioned ships?
Why research when you can bash something you don’t understand?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.