Posted on 09/27/2014 3:49:17 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
OK, but there is NOTHING in this article to indicate that anything is chiseled “in stone”. In fact, the article mentions that there are two (at least two) ideas that might explain the heavy/light water ratio of terrestrial water. This is really only of academic interest.
On the other hand, I am with you 100% when hypotheses (especially weak ones like man-made climate change/disruption/warming/cooling/ etc.) do become chiseled “in stone” and become the basis for misguided even disastrous public policy.
>> there is NOTHING in this article to indicate that anything is chiseled “in stone”.
Yeah, I sort of expanded the scope from a narrow answer to your question into a general-purpose rant. This particular article didn’t get that carried away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.