Posted on 09/17/2014 4:36:52 PM PDT by Kansas58
A very disturbing number of Freepers are openly advocating, on Free Republic threads, for the defeat of Senator Pat Roberts and other good Conservative Republicans. Greg Orman, in Kansas, is a pro abortion, anti gun, tax and spend Liberal Democrat who has given tens of thousands of dollars to Obama and Pelosi and the Democrat Party and Harry Reid. I am called an "idiot" for supporting Roberts. However, I think that those on Free Republic who support Harry Reid and Greg Orman should be ZOTTED, kicked off the site. I have had enough of there hate filled, vindictive, misguided trash.
So Like I said I guess you’d rather have Harry Reid and Obama appoint their (young) and very leftist Jurists to decide your fate (and mine) from the bench: WITH LIFETIME APPTMENTS, even.
In Roberts vs Orman, there is a prolife candidate: ROBERTS!
In Obama vs Romney, Romney was not my favorite but he was better than Obama. But to compare the two races is silly.
So how is it that Reoublicans that OKd Holder and a raft of other leftist appts can be counted on for a Supreme seat?
How exactly. In detail.
He voted against it. They are behind Cotton in Arkansas. Should they vote for Pryor instead? What are you trying to say?
Did Roberts vote to seat any of Obama’s supreme court justices?
If so, which ones?
Like Mississippian conservatives did only to get the rug pulled out from under them by the GOP establishment that would make LBJ blush?
For better or worse, my Party is Republican because it will never be Democrat.
Yeah, you're right. Because I prefer "market exchanges" in Obamacare compared to out-and-out federal government control.
"See, see...states are in charge of Obamacare! 10th Amendment! We care about liberty! < /Republican >
As I said, get control the Grass then you can take care of the Weeds (RINO’s). If you don’t run the show, you control nothing. Please refer to Harry Reid if you have any questions>
The Republican Party controls the House of Representatives. Why aren't they stopping Obama's and the Left's agenda? Why aren't departments being defunded and no attempts at cutting spending are being made?
Do what you like. Don’t be shocked when you try lib censor tactics to promote libs and get called on it.
The Chamber of Commerce endorsed him.
They are rabidly pro amnesty.
Birds of a feather...
You could but “Mickey Mouse” on the D line in a general election in this state and pull 5000 votes minimum.
So if Taylor on the ballot will split the vote why did McKaskell want Orman to ‘run as a democrat’?
That is obvious from your posts.
And NO, you are wrong. Orman waited too long to file as a Democrat, but filed instead as a Republican. Many think Orman did so in the chance that Milton Wolf would win the Republican Primary and be easy pickings.
So are you gonna tell me how in detail the people that approved all Obama’s leftists are gonna suddenly stop or not?
We are all waiting.
See, I asked first.
Do you know what cloture votes are?
Bush and Rove wanted to nominate Harriet Myers, a democrat to the
Supreme Court until a conservative revolt prevented it.
There are many other examples of the GOPe’s nominating liberals
to the Supreme Court.
At this point, I'm totally walking slowly away from someone who appears incoherent. It may be me but I'm just not on the same frequency.
Thanks. I was gonna do that.
Obviously a guy that thinks Bhoners GOP is more conservative than Reagans isn’t in a position to make judgement calls on the political leanings of anyone.
“So the GOPe emablers only want serious discussion for continued power of the GOPe?”
I think you know what I’m taking about. Voting for democrats is not a serious discussion.
Do you even KNOW how do google search or yahoo search?
Type: McCaskel Orman into your browser.
Try it!
Nor is voting for their enabling GOPE handmaidens. One is as bad as the other. Because either results in identical liberal outcomes.
See Amnesty for details.
I'm supposed to vote Republican, because that Republican will be so much better than the Democrat, and they'll have control of all the wonderful committees and appropriations.
Never mind the fact that said Republican endorses everything the Democrat believes in, completely accepts the Left's narrative on every issue, and argues from a defensive, whiny standpoint so the NY Times won't scream bold font at them.
I'm supposed to support a Republican candidate, and by extension the political party, a party that has generally said nothing and have done nothing about Obama's power grabs and the advancement of the Leftist agenda.
I've looked back on history since TR's third-party run, and I've read all about the Republican losers who completely bit the dust after being told that they can only win by supporting most of their opponent's agenda.
Then I look at the Republican landslides of 1972, 1980, 1984, 1994, and 2010.
Again, where is the logic?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.