Skip to comments.
'Dating Naked' contestant sues for $10 million after blur failed
MSN ^
| 08/22/2014
| Jason Hughes
Posted on 08/22/2014 12:05:10 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
Edited on 08/22/2014 12:10:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
According to the suit, Nizewitz signed on to the show before it had a name. She claims she was advised of the nudity, but was assured that all frontal and genital nudity would be blurred. During one brief moment, though, during a "wrestling takedown" of her date, her crotch was allegedly flashed on the screen without blurring.
(Excerpt) Read more at t.entertainment.msn.com ...
TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: law; lawsuit; napl; oops; publicnudity; reality; television; yesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
uhh.....if you don't want the general public to get a gander at your goodies, then perhaps you SHOULD NOT APPEAR ON A TELEVISION PROGRAM CALLED 'DATING NAKED'!!!!!
paging Captain Obvious...
To: Buckeye McFrog
2
posted on
08/22/2014 12:07:07 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Buckeye McFrog
I’ll give you 10 to 1 odds that she’s an Obama voter and didn’t make the connected. Or did, and just wants to cash in anyway.
3
posted on
08/22/2014 12:07:08 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: Raycpa
Okay, you claim you are embarrassed by video. Then you file a 10 million dollar lawsuit and have the lawsuit publicized just in case someone missed the original video?
4
posted on
08/22/2014 12:09:06 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: Buckeye McFrog
Yup, she’s gotta be a cracker with an Obamafone.
Dumb is as dumb does, idiotess.
5
posted on
08/22/2014 12:09:38 PM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: Buckeye McFrog
Just what the internet needs, more public displays of private parts. If I was on the jury I’d vote to give her the standard fee collected by a porn princess if it was more than she made for the appearance. Otherwise nothing. Don’t bother linking to the evidence. I’ve seen enough stupid in my life.
6
posted on
08/22/2014 12:09:51 PM PDT
by
meatloaf
To: Buckeye McFrog
won’t this draw more attention to her unwanted nudity? Already, I bet many people after reading this immediately do a Google Search of “Jessie Nizewitz”
7
posted on
08/22/2014 12:10:09 PM PDT
by
MNDude
To: Buckeye McFrog
This lawsuit is nothing more than a publicity stunt. And unfortunately it’s working.
8
posted on
08/22/2014 12:10:31 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
9
posted on
08/22/2014 12:10:54 PM PDT
by
Huskrrrr
To: Buckeye McFrog
Well, in fairness to her, they DID assure her this wouldn’t happen. But yes, nobody should appear on those kinds of dumb shows.
10
posted on
08/22/2014 12:12:07 PM PDT
by
Nea Wood
(When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.-Sowell)
To: Raycpa
Okay, you claim you are embarrassed by video. Then you file a 10 million dollar lawsuit and have the lawsuit publicized just in case someone missed the original video. I'd never heard of "Naked Dating," until this lawsuit.
Gotta go find the pics now. ;)
11
posted on
08/22/2014 12:13:00 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: Nea Wood
Nizewitz? Tricky spelling for a show called Dating Naked.
12
posted on
08/22/2014 12:13:40 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Buckeye McFrog
1...2...3...you can’t fix stupid.
13
posted on
08/22/2014 12:13:46 PM PDT
by
CincyRichieRich
(In Times of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Becomes a Revolutionary Act.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
14
posted on
08/22/2014 12:14:25 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(MARANATHA, MARANATHA, Come quickly LORD Jesus!!! Father send thy Son!! Its Time!)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Isn’t that like finding a cherry pit in a cherry pie and breaking a tooth. LOL
15
posted on
08/22/2014 12:14:51 PM PDT
by
jyro
(French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
To: Buckeye McFrog
"So you're telling me, she went on a show called 'Dating Naked', and is suing because she was shown in the nude?"
16
posted on
08/22/2014 12:14:53 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Buckeye McFrog
Nobody would see her nude except the director, camera crew, sound crew, key grip
17
posted on
08/22/2014 12:16:08 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: MNDude
Not saying anything but I theorize if one want to search the web for it they won’t have to look far. Say one or two clicks, I suspect ;)
18
posted on
08/22/2014 12:16:22 PM PDT
by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
To: Buckeye McFrog
I’m sure a pic of her vajayjay isn’t worth $10 mil
19
posted on
08/22/2014 12:16:28 PM PDT
by
jimmyo57
To: Buckeye McFrog
OK, the actors, cameramen, director, producer, electricians, editors, craft services, and dozens of other people hanging around the shoot can see her stuff but absolutely no one else.
20
posted on
08/22/2014 12:16:43 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson