Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Dating Naked' contestant sues for $10 million after blur failed
MSN ^ | 08/22/2014 | Jason Hughes

Posted on 08/22/2014 12:05:10 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog

Edited on 08/22/2014 12:10:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

According to the suit, Nizewitz signed on to the show before it had a name. She claims she was advised of the nudity, but was assured that all frontal and genital nudity would be blurred. During one brief moment, though, during a "wrestling takedown" of her date, her crotch was allegedly flashed on the screen without blurring.


(Excerpt) Read more at t.entertainment.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Society; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: law; lawsuit; napl; oops; publicnudity; reality; television; yesterday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
uhh.....if you don't want the general public to get a gander at your goodies, then perhaps you SHOULD NOT APPEAR ON A TELEVISION PROGRAM CALLED 'DATING NAKED'!!!!!

paging Captain Obvious...

1 posted on 08/22/2014 12:05:11 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

IBTZ


2 posted on 08/22/2014 12:07:07 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I’ll give you 10 to 1 odds that she’s an Obama voter and didn’t make the connected. Or did, and just wants to cash in anyway.


3 posted on 08/22/2014 12:07:08 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

Okay, you claim you are embarrassed by video. Then you file a 10 million dollar lawsuit and have the lawsuit publicized just in case someone missed the original video?


4 posted on 08/22/2014 12:09:06 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Yup, she’s gotta be a cracker with an Obamafone.

Dumb is as dumb does, idiotess.


5 posted on 08/22/2014 12:09:38 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Just what the internet needs, more public displays of private parts. If I was on the jury I’d vote to give her the standard fee collected by a porn princess if it was more than she made for the appearance. Otherwise nothing. Don’t bother linking to the evidence. I’ve seen enough stupid in my life.


6 posted on 08/22/2014 12:09:51 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

won’t this draw more attention to her unwanted nudity? Already, I bet many people after reading this immediately do a Google Search of “Jessie Nizewitz”


7 posted on 08/22/2014 12:10:09 PM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

This lawsuit is nothing more than a publicity stunt. And unfortunately it’s working.


8 posted on 08/22/2014 12:10:31 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.


9 posted on 08/22/2014 12:10:54 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Well, in fairness to her, they DID assure her this wouldn’t happen. But yes, nobody should appear on those kinds of dumb shows.


10 posted on 08/22/2014 12:12:07 PM PDT by Nea Wood (When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.-Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Okay, you claim you are embarrassed by video. Then you file a 10 million dollar lawsuit and have the lawsuit publicized just in case someone missed the original video.

I'd never heard of "Naked Dating," until this lawsuit.

Gotta go find the pics now. ;)

11 posted on 08/22/2014 12:13:00 PM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood

Nizewitz? Tricky spelling for a show called Dating Naked.


12 posted on 08/22/2014 12:13:40 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

1...2...3...you can’t fix stupid.


13 posted on 08/22/2014 12:13:46 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (In Times of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Becomes a Revolutionary Act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Roger that response.


14 posted on 08/22/2014 12:14:25 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (MARANATHA, MARANATHA, Come quickly LORD Jesus!!! Father send thy Son!! Its Time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Isn’t that like finding a cherry pit in a cherry pie and breaking a tooth. LOL


15 posted on 08/22/2014 12:14:51 PM PDT by jyro (French-like Democrats wave the white flag of surrender while we are winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

"So you're telling me, she went on a show called 'Dating Naked', and is suing because she was shown in the nude?"

16 posted on 08/22/2014 12:14:53 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Nobody would see her nude except the director, camera crew, sound crew, key grip …


17 posted on 08/22/2014 12:16:08 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Not saying anything but I theorize if one want to search the web for it they won’t have to look far. Say one or two clicks, I suspect ;)


18 posted on 08/22/2014 12:16:22 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I’m sure a pic of her vajayjay isn’t worth $10 mil


19 posted on 08/22/2014 12:16:28 PM PDT by jimmyo57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

OK, the actors, cameramen, director, producer, electricians, editors, craft services, and dozens of other people hanging around the shoot can see her stuff but absolutely no one else.


20 posted on 08/22/2014 12:16:43 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson