Skip to comments.
Swat Team Raids Innocent Woman's Home; Lawsuit Filed
Liveleak ^
Posted on 08/13/2014 8:28:01 AM PDT by Dacula
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Jack Booted Thugs at it again.
1
posted on
08/13/2014 8:28:01 AM PDT
by
Dacula
To: Dacula
2
posted on
08/13/2014 8:28:35 AM PDT
by
Dacula
To: Dacula
“objectively reasonable” force. Couldn’t they have knocked on the friggin’ door and served a warrant?
To: null and void
JBT ping.
4
posted on
08/13/2014 8:29:32 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Dacula
I hate the jack booted thugs.
Does that earn me flash-bangs?
5
posted on
08/13/2014 8:30:32 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
No. This was the police punishing the serfs for getting uppity.
6
posted on
08/13/2014 8:31:04 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
To: Dacula
The CURSE OF OBAMANATION is taking hold in America.
7
posted on
08/13/2014 8:31:46 AM PDT
by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: Pearls Before Swine
No. For most of those men, the only way they can get sexually excited is to kick down doors and hold guns at the heads of innocent people. If there was a puppy to kick or shoot, it would have been even better.
Absolutely useless humans, these new cops.
8
posted on
08/13/2014 8:32:10 AM PDT
by
christx30
(Freedom above all.)
To: Dacula
the force used to execute the search warrant, was objectively reasonable Say something nasty about the police, and it is reasonable for them to throw grenades at you.
9
posted on
08/13/2014 8:32:27 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
To: Dacula
Pig Billy Bolin:
10
posted on
08/13/2014 8:32:53 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
To: Dacula
“Threatening posts” do not in a sensible world justify a SWAT raid. If they had politely served their warrant, searched, and found nothing, that would not have been a problem with the foolishly unsecured network. The route they took clearly justifies a lawsuit.
11
posted on
08/13/2014 8:32:59 AM PDT
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Dacula
We have the JBT category for the jack-booted thugs but let’s not forget the judge who rubber-stamps the warrants. If enough pressure can be put on a judge, perhaps s/he’d be interested in filing a bench warrant or two for filing a false application in some of these cases.
But that is a generic comment. What we can glean from the article is that the messages did originate with the victim’s IP address and that the threats were made by a gang leader so the threats were likely just a little bit stronger than usual. That’s probably enough to shield the PD from liability even if the sovereign immunity veil was pierced.
12
posted on
08/13/2014 8:41:13 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
("Kerry, as Obama's plenipotentiary, is a paradox - the physical presence of a geopolitical absence")
To: Dacula
City attorneys contend that the force used to execute the search warrant, was objectively reasonable and that officials are immune from liability. For calling the Police Chief names on the Internet??
I understand that this lady did not do anything, and that it was someone else who used her unsecured Wi-Fi -- but even if she did - did that warrant a SWAT attack? This is absurd. We have become a Police State.
13
posted on
08/13/2014 8:41:39 AM PDT
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: Dacula
Here is my G damn problem. They are nothing but ars hats right out of as Rambo movie. BUT! If the result of the lawsuit is awarded to the victims, it payment comes right out of the tax payers pockets. IT SHOULD COME OUT OF EVERY ARS HATS PAYCHECK.
To: Dacula
"City attorneys contend that the force used to execute the search warrant, was objectively reasonable
and that officials are immune from liability."
I do not know whether to laugh or cry.
15
posted on
08/13/2014 8:42:22 AM PDT
by
spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
(Why does every totalitarian political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I do?)
To: Dacula
Citizens need to start marching down to their local police departments & demand that all SWAT teams be disbanded. This kind of response is beyond outrageous!
16
posted on
08/13/2014 8:42:22 AM PDT
by
Twotone
(Marte Et Clypeo)
To: Dacula
Some morons NEVER learn. They were lucky that there was not another baby laying on the floor to be burned by their rah, rah we are the swat thugs and do not answer to anyone for hurting innocent people.
17
posted on
08/13/2014 8:42:30 AM PDT
by
chiefqc
To: Pollster1
Furthermore, running open WiFi is not a crime.
Stupid, but not a crime.
18
posted on
08/13/2014 8:45:40 AM PDT
by
Salgak
(Peace through Superior Firepower. . . .)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: Dacula
When I am on the phone with my daughter I will occasionally, in the middle of our conversation say “Obama bombing” and she will immediately begin telling me the condition of youngest baby’s diaper. We think it’s funny because whoever is listening to us will get an earful of crap.
20
posted on
08/13/2014 8:49:29 AM PDT
by
Slyfox
(Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson