Posted on 07/27/2014 9:49:37 AM PDT by djf
Scientific evidence refuting the theory of modern humanity’s African genesis is common knowledge among those familiar with the most recent scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomes. Regrettably, within mainstream press and academia circles, there seems to be a conspicuous – and dare we say it – deliberate vacuum when it comes to reporting news of these recent studies and their obvious implications.
(Excerpt) Read more at atlanteangardens.blogspot.com.au ...
That’s racist!
/sarc
Cue the racist kid! And the Asian one, too!
I always knew it was complicated.
Actually this is one article and by no means a definitive one. If you actually learn anything about the subject, you’ll note that the science of genetics has come a long way in the last 5-10 years, and is by no means finished. Out of Africa is still the primary theory, irrespective of this article. Make up all the conspiracy theories you like, that’s where the data is now like it or not. Google up ISOGG for the best available current theory if you care to deal with facts, and not science-fiction.
I think the out of Africa theory was designed to stop any Bible migration theories. If man came out of Africa then Noah’s Ark could not have started civilization form the mountains where the Ark landed.
The Out of Africa theory is about a time some 100,000 years ago. The time of the great flood was around 2,500 BC.
Interesting.
The questions still remain; are the factual assertions of this article true and accurate?
Both books do a excellent job of explaining racial differences based upon the human genome.
The Garden of Eden was in what is present day Iraq.
Some have said Noah’s flood was 100,000 years ago also. Lots of stories and little fact. I like the one that said King Tut was IRISH! There is a great difference between the lame stream media and real scientific data.
An interesting DNA/genetics article.
Interesting stuff!
‘Central to results of this extensive examination of haplogroups (7,556) was the absence of any African genes. So lacking was the sampling of African genetic involvement, the researchers stated in their introduction that, “the finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid, as well as all non-African groups do not carry either SNI’s M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262”. [...]
‘They see no genetic proof substantiating an African precedence in the Homo sapien tree, and maintain that “a more plausible interpretation might have been that both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient common ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork”.’
“I think the out of Africa theory was designed to stop any Bible migration theories. “
The second in line theory is that humans from different places (i.e. races) have evolved from different primitive humans. The creationist theory has long been run out of town.
There goes my chance for reparations.
I see you don’t really understand science do you? One article and or one datapoint does not make or break a theory.
The creationist theory has long been run out of town.
Not for me and a lot of people.
I see you don’t understand the difference between a fact, and consensus.
Affirming what smart people think doesn’t make YOU smart.
“Some have said Noah’s flood was 100,000 years ago also.”
Very likely that one or many great floods occurred between 16,500 B.C. and 10,000 B.C. when the glacier cap melted (the end of the Ice Age); Noah’s flood could be anywhere in-between and sea levels rose 400-700 feet. When pools of water form on or under a glacier (especially when the glacier is 2-3 Km in height); release is usually sudden and catastrophic, when the ice dam holding the water back breaks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.