Posted on 05/04/2014 1:35:16 PM PDT by Tigen
1.Obama has changed sides on war on Terror. 2.Is obama running guns to russian seperatists? 3.Obama told Putin he would have more FLEXIBILITY after the election! 4 Obama has proven and said he could kill at will. 5. Putin will help obama destroy this country!
Wasted a lot of time reading grammar posts, however, I had to figure out what kind of alliance they would form. Obviously Putin’s motives are power and money and being that he wants it will align himself with the Muslims. Otherwise why support Syria and Iran.
The only obvious alliance from zero’s stand would be communism and being a Muslim. He certainly isn’t into power because he is a jellyfish, no backbone, no brains, very flexible and also no color, just see through him. In that way this administration is actually very transparent because we can see what he is doing even if he is trying to hide what he is going. Getting stung by a jellyfish is deadly. He does love the money. The one thing that is keeping that family together.
Putin isn’t a Communist, and the Chinese are Communist in name only. Both are just crony capitalist dictatorships, though the Chinese still use communism as an official justification to hold onto power. Again you seem to have a problem thinking outside of preconceived stereotypes.
I didn’t call Putin a communist, although we don’t know that he isn’t anymore, and at this point, it doesn’t matter how he labels his empire building.
Again your post is just meaningless. I will just mark you down as what it appears you are doing, supporting Putin’s expansion.
It would save time if you would just post things that represent your politics, rather all the cutesy, evasive stuff, like that silly first post.
I don’t “support” Putin’s expansion. I just don’t think it’s our job to stop it, even if we could, which we can’t. Our government is also hypocritical preaching about national sovereignty when we went to war to illegally take Kosovo from Serbia and give it to muslim terrorists. That is a perfect example of foreign policy being carried out for the benefit of international elites. There was no American national interest, and now we are paying for that bit of arrogance.
As for my first post, what exactly doesn’t make sense to you about it? You are aware than we borrow money from China aren’t you? Don’t you think China would be happy to see us and Russia at each other’s throats? The person I directed the comment to had no problem understanding it.
“Probably not, Putin is just tuggin’ Zero around the world by his D*ck.”
___________________________________________
I agree. Putin is basking in the sun as he makes fun of Zero.
Putin is a real man. God only knows what Zero is.
Well, I read you correctly, that was a lengthy post in support of Putin, and against our NATO alliance.
God, you’re dense. I give up.
If I be, will you be or we be not to be?
Not dense at all, I disagree with you, although you are so hesitant to speak clearly, and your only interest is that we don’t get involved in world events, until the world events have us in a position where it is too late to act.
We still have plenty of sergeants in the military who were a part of a desperate effort to protect us from the last Russian empire.
“and your only interest is that we don’t get involved in world events, until the world events have us in a position where it is too late to act.”
Where did I ever say that? Just because I don’t want to get embroiled with Russia over Ukraine means I don’t care about what happens in the world? And if I don’t want to I “support” Putin? Either you are deliberately misrepresenting my position, or you can’t grasp the idea of picking your fights.
Putin and Obama have the same goal: destroy America and it’s status as a superpower
We are part of NATO and European stability, and are definitely a part of limiting Russian aggression and conquest, it is in our national interests.
You have made it pretty clear that it isn’t just Ukraine that you want us to be passive on, you have been describing in vague terms, a foreign policy philosophy that seems to be to not do anything.
You seem to be libertarian on defense and foreign policy.
I would support attacking Iran, if, and only if, we are committed to destroying the regime and all their capability of ever threatening us with nuclear weapons again, because that would be in our national interest. Also only if we leave shortly thereafter. No nation building crap. But I don't see the political will to do so from anyone in either party. And that doesn't mean anyone who disagrees "supports" the mullahs.
Ditto for Venezuela which is a lot more our concern than the Ukraine.
I didn’t even know that anyone here was thinking about attacking anyone at all, and I sure wouldn’t have thought that Venezuela was on anyone’s invasion list.
No wonder you keep your ideas under cover.
Thanks a million I had to go get a beer after the word and spelling dildos came on and couldn’t speak about the subject.
I most humbly had to pick up dentures.
Laughed out so hard it crashed puter.
Thanks for that post.
There’s probably better options than going to war in Venezuela. But my point is what happens a thousand miles away is more critical than what happens on Russia’s border. And I’m not keeping any ideas “under cover”. I’ve been posting exactly what I think about things here pretty much since FR started.
I don't know; is they?
They both be workin’ for new world order.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.