Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man’s Estranged Wife Removes His Feeding Tube to Starve Him to Death, Despite Court Order
LIFE NEWS ^ | Wesley J. Smith

Posted on 04/07/2014 7:29:50 PM PDT by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Girlene
The guy was estranged from the wife for five years and was currently going through divorce proceedings.....Divorce seems like a conflict of interest to me.
Until it's actually signed and sealed by the court, you're still married and it doesn't matter what's going on. Your spouse has got the control.

He should have made a living will and deposited it with a relative, stating what he wanted done in the eventuality of such an issue.
21 posted on 04/08/2014 12:36:43 AM PDT by GAFreedom (Freedom rings in GA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

I’m so sorry.


22 posted on 04/08/2014 5:59:54 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GAFreedom

You’re right, the spouse does have the control....however, his family went to court and became his guardians (or medical guardians, I guess). The hospital still did what the illegal guardian (the soon to be ex-wife) wanted anyway and took away his hydration and feeding until his parents found out.

The parents had the control; the hospital ignored them.


23 posted on 04/08/2014 6:03:21 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
The parents had the control; the hospital ignored them.
Huh. The way I was reading it, the timeline is that the wife came down and ordered the tubes out, the parents found out and filed for guardianship, and then after it was granted they had the tubes put back in but it was too late. Am I reading that wrong?
24 posted on 04/08/2014 6:56:47 PM PDT by GAFreedom (Freedom rings in GA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GAFreedom

You are right. I misunderstood the original article. Thanks for clearing that up.


25 posted on 04/08/2014 7:32:27 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Girlene; GAFreedom

Wrong. The hospital surprised the family be removing his feeding tube again, after the court had ordered them to reconnect it. They did this in blatant violation of the court order, and they misled the family about it.

This is not uncommon. This is the way brain injured patients are treated. Good luck picking twelve random people who would hand down a guilty verdict in such a case. You’d play hell finding twelve random FReepers who could agree that it’s wrong to murder someone with a severe brain injury.


26 posted on 04/09/2014 7:34:13 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Wagglebee please come home we miss you! ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb; GAFreedom

That’s what I thought originally, BykrBayb. I’m not sure. I reread the article and its links again, and GAFreedom may be right.

Either way, it does seem sometimes that hospitals are quick to hurry the demise of brain injured patients. You have to watch them when it comes to the elderly as well.

This is a good reason for people to specify who will be making medical decisions for them if they’re not able to do so.


27 posted on 04/09/2014 9:13:48 PM PDT by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson