Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: UriÂ’el-2012

The 777 doesn’t need 7000 ft to land 3500 would be workable with light load.


45 posted on 03/15/2014 11:16:50 AM PDT by Robe (Rome did not create a great empire by talking, they did it by killing all those who opposed them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Robe
The 777 doesn’t need 7000 ft to land 3500 would be workable with light load.

What was the take off weight from Malaysia ?

How about subsequent take off ?


48 posted on 03/15/2014 11:30:01 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: Robe

“The 777 doesn’t need 7000 ft to land 3500 would be workable with light load”

There was a link to a YouTube Video on a thread a couple days back. The Video was of an Air Emirates 777 landing using full reverse thrusters, it was amazing how little runway it needed.


85 posted on 03/16/2014 4:12:27 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson