Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservative4Ever

That would be Indian. But evidently the maker of the map was trying to be “politically correct.”


15 posted on 09/29/2013 11:24:38 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76; Conservative4Ever

Then why are Aleut/Eskimo and American Indian listed in separate categories?


39 posted on 09/29/2013 11:53:02 AM PDT by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76; Conservative4Ever
That would be Indian. But evidently the maker of the map was trying to be “politically correct.”

You didn't read the article:

"Almost 20 million people claim to have 'American' ancestry for political reasons and because they are unsure of their family's genealogy."

42 posted on 09/29/2013 11:55:17 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: SamAdams76; Conservative4Ever
The third item down on the list states American. I don’t get it.

That would be Indian. But evidently the maker of the map was trying to be “politically correct.”


Incorrect assumption. The article at the link states in the subheadlines under the title: "Almost 20 million people claim to have 'American' ancestry for political reasons [or] because they are unsure of their family's genealogy".

66 posted on 09/29/2013 12:31:25 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("Remember... the first revolutionary was Satan."--Russian Orthodox Archpriest Dmitry Smirnov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson