Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Multiple Obama Birth Certificates Surface In Alabama Eligibility Case
freedom outpost ^ | May 1, 2013 | Tim Brown

Posted on 05/01/2013 8:11:44 AM PDT by EXCH54FE

The Alabama Democrat Party just submitted a completely different birth certificate than the one that was posted at the White House website in 2011.

Larry Klayman, the plaintiff’s counsel submitted the forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate that was posted to whitehouse.gov on 4-27-2001 (seen below). Fogbow/Jack Ryan obot group produced another bogus one. Still a third birth certificate has been submitted by Alabama Democrats to the Supreme Court.

Remember, this court is being presided over by Chief Justice Roy Moore, who supported Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, when he believed Obama to be a usurper and denied following orders to deploy to Iraq until Obama proved his eligibility as part of keeping his oath (ironically Lakin was not supported by Mr. Oathkeeper Stewart Rhodes). Another justice on the court by the name of Tom Parker will also hear the case. He has stated in a previous case:

“McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the “short form” and the “long form” birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”

While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish “inadmissible and not worthy of belief,” they also stated “A county sheriff from Arizona is not an ‘official source’ of anything in Alabama.”

But what stands out in their brief is something very new, Barack Hussein Obama’s long form birth certificate that has a different backing, something never before seen. It’s on page 33 in the document below.

(Excerpt) Read more at freedomoutpost.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: afterbirtherbs; alabama; birthcertificate; birther; birthers; cairmsm; certifigate; destroyeconomy; dirtystatedept; eligibilitycase; fogbow; fraud; fundbrotherhood; jail; muslimbrotherhood; nationalsecurity; naturalborncitizen; obama; obotbs; obotsaretrolls; obotspaidtodisrupt; plannedattack; roymoore; saudipuppet; ushijacked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-218 next last
To: rarestia
-- there will be an extreme Constitutional crisis requiring the review of all laws he signed. --

The courts have a widget for that, called the "de facto officer doctrine." Nothing would be undone.

The people ought to boot the entirety of Congress out on its ear, for failing to discuss the ramifications of dual citizenship at birth, and noting that dual citizenship at birth can be synonymous with "natural born citizen" of the US. The reason the conversation didn't happen is that Congress is uncomfortable with that conversation, Congress knows that some fraction of the public would not agree with a finding that a dual citizen by birth and natural born citizen are the same thing, so it just flat out ignored the point.

Damned elite pricks have wrecked the country in so many ways.

41 posted on 05/01/2013 9:12:30 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

stfu de facto officer doctrine does not apply


42 posted on 05/01/2013 9:15:04 AM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Excellent picture! Interesting that the taller guard looks like Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, a centre-right mayor, in a lefty city, constantly under attack by Canadian media and communist city coucellors.


43 posted on 05/01/2013 9:18:12 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was lost but now I'm found; blind but now I see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Question! How would Obama’s appointment of SC justices play against the USA Senate approval i.e. advice and consent?


44 posted on 05/01/2013 9:19:54 AM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

“stfu de facto officer doctrine does not apply”

The De Facto Officer Doctrine does apply to judicial rulings and verdicts from a judge appointed by a usurper unless there is an objection lodged pre-trial.

The Congress and the Court will not interfere with the people’s right to elect a usurper as their leader and Commander-in-Chief. But, an individual can object to adverse action taken against them for following or adhereing to a law signed by a usurper if they make their objection known before trial.

Obama supporters may not object to the Affordable Care and Protection Act signed by Obama. But those who do object, can opt out by objecting when adverse action is taken against them.

Elections have consquences. But, you can opt out if the leader is a usurper.


45 posted on 05/01/2013 9:26:26 AM PDT by SvenMagnussen (1983 ... the year Obama became a naturalized U.S. citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Is there a simple explanation for these differences? To me it looks like the different versions were taken on different security paper. If they were scanned from an original, then there should be minor difference between them. If they were scanned from a copy, they could be the same. One looks like it's a copy of copy which could easily explain the edge difference.

Multiple images that look the same but with different attributes, actually give weight to verity of the COLB and the fact that there is a real "mother" document. If so, where is it?

As for the layers, what's missing is the voice of the expert. Or maybe the voice is there, but it's lost in the noise. This would take deep technical knowledge and experience. For example, I have deep knowledge of one of the Office applications, and know things about it that are difficult to explain to casual users. With this background, to me the layers in themselves aren't evidence of anything. In fact, if 2 of the images have massively different layers, it would seem to be that they were scanned by different devices or used different applications. If only one layer is different, that would seem to be an electronic modification. A lot of the excitement may be from people who don't understand how scanning works. Since I don't know, and have the voice of someone who really does, I have to without judgment.

Of course, with so much related to BO being a lie and hot air, there's a real tendency to expect everything is that way. There's so much in his background that disqualifies him, but the liberals and blacks want him. People have stopped praying enough and BO is the consequence of a largely backslidden nation.

46 posted on 05/01/2013 9:28:07 AM PDT by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE
Apparently you are a rabid, psychotic, delusional birther! </sarc>

Seriously great article! Thanks for posting, bro!

To borrow a quote from Obama's long time friend, Bill Ayers: "Guilty as sin, free as a bird."

Justice will be done. Hopefully soon.

Just a personal thought on the subject. Obama would sell us out and see America destroyed before he would give up the Presidency. (Oh wait, he's almost there now.)

From the article:

"All of this is going to make certain people a little uneasy who think this is just a “birther issue.” It’s not. It’s a criminal issue. It’s a national security issue. My fellow Americans, the Democrats are telling on themselves left and right. They are openly lying to you about the man in the Oval Office and everyone thinks there is something more important? I don’t think so. Yes Benghazi is important. Yes, Fast and Furious is important. However, it appears that for the first time we have a man in the White House that we cannot really say is even from this country and apparently there is some serious felonies taking place in attempts to cover up what should be the biggest story covered in America and that is to expose a usurper to the office of President of the United States.

In case you are still thinking this doesn’t matter, might I suggest you consider how this would impact things, versus impeachment for Benghazi or Fast and Furious? Understand that this would potentially nullify every law he has signed, every executive order he has given, and every Supreme Court appointment he has made. While many are saying that Benghazi is bigger than Watergate, and it most definitely is, the Obama eligibility issue is bigger than all Obama’s scandals, in my opinion, because of the tentacles around things that it affects."

47 posted on 05/01/2013 9:29:03 AM PDT by Perseverando (The truth is hate to those who hate the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

3 different Obama birf certificates submitted to the court.

One from the AL Dem party. Number 2 from an Obot FogBlower and 3 the White House birf cert.


48 posted on 05/01/2013 9:30:33 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Differences indicate forgeries - that’s all there is to it.


49 posted on 05/01/2013 9:31:19 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

Anyone in the GOP Media and Talk shows....who continue to ignore and attack Obama Eligibility issues....are nothing more than Obama Supporters. That is the real issue here.

We have another Phony Obama Birth Cert.....and yet we will get hours of “Michelle has a big butt” from Obama Supporter PhonyCon media


50 posted on 05/01/2013 9:33:16 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Excellent points.

Your advice is spot on....either Arpaio is a liar or Obama is a liar. And the latter just spent millions trying to prove Arpaio is a liar...and was proved wrong


51 posted on 05/01/2013 9:37:31 AM PDT by SeminoleCounty (GOP - Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PA Engineer
This is a fundamental point. If he was never qualified for office and attained it by fraud, then impeachment is not necessary. Numerous criminal complaints can be filed and enforced without the Executive and Constitutional shields.

Given the current diseased nature of our court system, I am certain they will uphold everything he did as legal. They have a Judicial principle which is called the "De Facto Officer" principle (if I remember correctly) which basically means that any act performed by an illegitimate "officer" remains in force because it was presumed at the time he was legitimate. I found a link. http://definitions.uslegal.com/d/de-facto-officer/

Yeah, i'm pretty sure the court system will screw this up, the same as they always screw things up.

52 posted on 05/01/2013 9:43:44 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

It really is that simple.


53 posted on 05/01/2013 9:46:57 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Given the current diseased nature of our court system, I am certain they will uphold everything he did as legal. They have a Judicial principle which is called the "De Facto Officer" principle (if I remember correctly) which basically means that any act performed by an illegitimate "officer" remains in force because it was presumed at the time he was legitimate. I found a link. http://definitions.uslegal.com/d/de-facto-officer/

Yeah, i'm pretty sure the court system will screw this up, the same as they always screw things up.

If they were to uphold everything as legit, then I would be very surprised if there wasn't bloodshed... and to be honest, forcing judges to flee or be tarred and feathered in such a case would be light consequence indeed.

54 posted on 05/01/2013 9:50:48 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
The media has pulled off one of the greatest hoaxes on the public of all time

True. This is the Left's/Democrat Socialist Party's one best shot at replacing our republican form of government with European socialism/communism. They know it -- they want it desperately -- and they will do whatever is necessary to accomplish what has been their dream for the past 100 years.

Their stars are aligned:
-- With the help of educators and the university system they have dumbed down our education system such that most people are ignorant of the history of our republic and are unaware of the horrors of socialism and communism;
-- With the willing assistance of the "opposition party" over the past 40 years they have instilled a culture of dependency -- people see themselves as victims of our free society demanding that government, through regulations, lawsuits, etc., use whatever force necessary to make productive fellow citizens pay for their needs and desires;
-- With the help of the liberal/Left media and Hollywood they have condemned, in the eyes of the uninformed and/or disinterested, any ideas, policies and people who dare challenge their historically-failed idealism and, as Walter Williams observed in today's commentary, have effectively shut down reasoned debate of these issues.

Sadly, the "opposition party" still thinks they can "play nice" with these people ... especially do the party leaders think this way.

55 posted on 05/01/2013 9:51:26 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

bkmk


56 posted on 05/01/2013 9:53:45 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
If they were to uphold everything as legit, then I would be very surprised if there wasn't bloodshed... and to be honest, forcing judges to flee or be tarred and feathered in such a case would be light consequence indeed.

I would hope that would be the case, but given the current nature of the American Electorate I would not be surprised if they simply said "Huh?"

They really are "Brawndo" voters nowadays.


57 posted on 05/01/2013 9:56:22 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
The Thirst Mutilator!
(I take it you've seen the ads, right?)
58 posted on 05/01/2013 10:05:41 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

No, I hadn’t seen it. Thanks.


59 posted on 05/01/2013 10:08:45 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: EXCH54FE

This is good, of course, and I hope this will also include his vice presidential choice?


60 posted on 05/01/2013 10:25:05 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson