I think I've been quite clear. "Rape" is not determined by outrage.
You haven’t been clear at all, you’ve somehow been defending some boys for raping a 16 year old girl because she was passed out drunk. Now you’re going to claim we’re just outraged (which would be a normal position for a decent human being to have considering what these boys seem to have done), presumably because you think you’re the only one who is thinking clearly that these boys didn’t actually force her to have sex while she was passed out. That’s a pretty crazy position you’re taking. You also dodged my other questions, presumably because you can’t defend what you’re saying in light of them. Here they are again: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2996300/posts?page=52#52
It is determined by age. Is she 16? Then she was raped. EOS.