Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Not to mention his threat to fire thousands of border agents.
1 posted on 02/27/2013 9:59:42 AM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: chessplayer

Woah! With Woodward calling Obama “nuts” I sense a little bit of break in the ranks of the media lap dogs.


2 posted on 02/27/2013 10:04:51 AM PST by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
HEY! ...Woodward, We've seen it every-day.
....or have your eyes been closed all this time???

5 posted on 02/27/2013 10:09:12 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,$pend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Blowfly can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

This is not funny. Obama is revealing a dangerous passive-aggressive disorder. In my opinion, a personality trait, if coupled with the inability to use logic and control, makes Obama a very president.


6 posted on 02/27/2013 10:14:18 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Ooops!

He’s off the “A” list - effective immediately


8 posted on 02/27/2013 10:23:48 AM PST by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Woodward uses the term “madness” when referring to the POTUS’ actions. Is the worm turning on Bam? Certainly madness can lead to impeachment.


9 posted on 02/27/2013 10:26:13 AM PST by kenmcg (scapegoat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

That’s a strange threat - firing thousands of Border Patrol agents - when our area paper had a recent ad for BP...now hiring.


10 posted on 02/27/2013 10:27:27 AM PST by Jane Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
I'm not sure the White House understands exactly what happened in all of these negotiations at the end of 2011 with the sequester and the super committee and God knows what because they were really on the sidelines

Well, Woodward is talking out both sides of his mouth.

This statement is idiotic.

12 posted on 02/27/2013 10:36:20 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Better late than never, I suppose......

How the rest of these libs have put up with this insanity is beyond me.

The constant lying, actual direct payments to cronies and fundraisers, the obvious thin skinned juvenile petulance, the hypocritical pretense to hate the rich, the insane vote fraud and vote buying, the absolute criminal mindset of the Chicago thugs, the constant pandering to a base that has lost its mind (and quite frankly has no soul); having to defend all this and come to the aid of a clearly inept and destructive regime every day must get old.

Even a partisan hack like Woodward has a limit.

13 posted on 02/27/2013 10:43:32 AM PST by Lakeshark (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

Bob Woodward is seeing that this whole mess is going down big time bad and is trying to cover his ass.


19 posted on 02/27/2013 11:19:17 AM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

It is madness. He is crazy. Crazy.


21 posted on 02/27/2013 11:59:34 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer
Umm, I wouldn't be so quick to support or celebrate Woodward's comments. Look at what he's saying, in context:

Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying, “Oh, by the way, I can't do this because of some budget document,” or George W. Bush saying, “You know, I'm not going to invade Iraq because I can't get the aircraft carriers I need,” or even Bill Clinton saying, “You know, I'm not going to attack Saddam Hussein’s intelligence headquarters” as he did when Clinton was president “because of some budget document?” Under the Constitution, the president is Commander-in-Chief and employs the force. And so we now have the president going out because of this piece of paper and this agreement, “I can't do what I need to do to protect the country.” That's a kind of madness that I haven't seen in a long time.

He's saying that Obama, as commander-in-chief, should just ignore the sequester (a duly-enacted law) and spend the money anyway, and that Obama's failure to do so is "madness."

23 posted on 02/27/2013 12:25:12 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

libs like woodward have to chalk it up as madness. they can’t believe - like us - that this is totally delierate and planned.

it is called late phase 2/phase three of Freedom From War. state dept publication 5277.

it also ties in the domestic drones, dhs fema corps, tsa and ubiquitous scanning of our emails and phone calls. and turning police into paramilitary forces.


24 posted on 02/27/2013 12:35:26 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: chessplayer

OK, thats two so far:

Bob Woodward
Bill Plante

We need a third to question the propaganda of the state-run media from it’s own ranks.

Are we witnessing a crack in Obama’s Iron Curtain Media?

Mr. Obama ... tear down this wall!


26 posted on 02/27/2013 1:01:24 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson