[freedumb2003]

>>I think you misunderstood. The person blowing off the interview is NOT the candidate, but the interviewer.<<

I completely misunderstood. Thanks for the clarification

>>That is why I don’t understand why the candidates continue to bother with us. Almost all of them currently have jobs.<<

FWIIW (and I know on the Internet no one knows you are a dog), I am very much in demand for my 35+ years experience in managing the implementation of large systems — Financials and HR/Payroll — in pretty large ($1+ Bln) companies.

Recruiting good talent is more difficult than being on the receiving end.

Blowing off new talent is as bad as new kids blowing off interviews.

[grey_whiskers]

FWIIW (and I know on the Internet no one knows you are a dog), I am very much in demand for my 35+ years experience in managing the implementation of large systems — Financials and HR/Payroll — in pretty large ($1+ Bln) companies.,

And now we know what *you* are... ;-)

See last Sunday's Dilbert strip for details.

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

FWIIW (and I know on the Internet no one knows you are a dog), I am very much in demand for my 35+ years experience in managing the implementation of large systems — Financials and HR/Payroll — in pretty large ($1+ Bln) companies.,

And now we know what *you* are... ;-)

See last Sunday's Dilbert strip for details.

Cheers!