Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin says Santorum is not a ‘threat’ to Romney
The Blaze ^ | 2-11-12 | Santerelli

Posted on 02/12/2012 2:35:54 PM PST by VinL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-178 next last
To: Arkady Orinko

It depends on what you mean by “anti-”.

Facts are always welcome. There exists a huge amount of information on Newt Gingrich. His record and past have been argued ad nauseum on this site.

Rick Santorum...not so much.

I started doing research on Rick Santorum about three weeks ago and whenever I present information, I get flamed as being a Romney supporter.

Voters, in order to make an informed decision, must have as much knowledge about the candidates as possible. I did this last time, in 2008, and was flamed for trying to inform folks about Obama.

That sure turned out swell, didn’t it. /sarcasm


61 posted on 02/12/2012 4:22:14 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: FReepers
Click

GO NEWT!
GO FREE REPUBLIC!!!

62 posted on 02/12/2012 4:23:53 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
.

Correction: Willard ran 13,000 TV ads to Newt's 200 ...

Ratio: 65:1


.
63 posted on 02/12/2012 4:24:18 PM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600

If Sarah were a risk taker, she would have run herself. If she wanted the pressure, she could have run herself. If she wanted to take on more of all that, she would have run herself. Expecting more from her than being beautiful and speaking what we each already speak is too much, given the path she chose instead. Thankfully, she doesn’t look like Barbara Mukulsky, so we listen, and Sarah draws seven figures because we do.


64 posted on 02/12/2012 4:35:19 PM PST by RitaOK (LET 'ER RIP, NEWT. Romnomoney buys Santorum. Newt has become a CAUSE & Rick S, a tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Palin for President.

Followed by...

Gingrich for President.

65 posted on 02/12/2012 4:36:22 PM PST by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest
Some of the pettiest, most off putting behavior, was Newt’s response after Florida.

B.S. Please provide links and documented proof of what you assert. Newt had a right to be angry at the lying smears about him. Mitt had outright lies aired all over Florida.

If you can, please provide one example of Newt being petty.

66 posted on 02/12/2012 4:43:31 PM PST by sand88 (Nothing on this Earth would get me to vote for Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Most of all, Santorum voted against NAFTA - a dumb move if there ever was one

Hey, I agree with you, Doll. But you're mighty brave to write that on FR where, for all too many, freedom ends with trade.

67 posted on 02/12/2012 4:44:32 PM PST by BfloGuy (The final outcome of the credit expansion is general impoverishment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: VinL

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL5vils-4NI&feature=youtube_gdata_player. Santorum, his greatest hits on YouTube.


68 posted on 02/12/2012 4:46:38 PM PST by Taxachusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkady Orinko
While I would vote for him, most conservative women I know would not.

that's funny. I know at least a dozen Conservative friends who are female and none expressed any reservations about Newt.

69 posted on 02/12/2012 4:47:04 PM PST by sand88 (Nothing on this Earth would get me to vote for Mitt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

That’s something I mentioned on a different political forum I frequent and got pretty hardcore flamed for it. Indeed, she is only speaking what we already speak. It’s safe, easy, not dangerous. Of course we eat it up. She’s not offering anything really profound here. She’s not leaping out and taking the hits. She’s not jumping into a fist fight and getting bloodied up here. She has her own safe haven amongst the conservative media, and the libs will always give her a platform. I can appreciate her not willing to endorse a candidate, but she isn’t really saying anything noteworthy. She goes to a certain point, and then just pulls back. She softens her blows, including “all 4 candidates” in with her criticisms. She blasts one, but then pulls back, embraces another, but then pulls back. You sit there waiting for her to drop the hammer, but then she doesn’t so we sit here speculating on what she really meant or who she really supports.

She’s lukewarm in this race, plain and simple. And that is certainly her right to not get involved in this way. But lets not fool ourselves for what it really is: Commentary, not leadership.

I don’t buy the whole “She doesn’t want to endorse lest her bad mojo manufactured by the media will latch on to whoever she endorsed”. Fact of the matter is, the media is already going after conservatives the way they went after her. It couldn’t possibly get any worse.


70 posted on 02/12/2012 4:51:04 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sand88

Count me in, I will gladly vote Newt.


71 posted on 02/12/2012 4:51:34 PM PST by Taxachusan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: VinL

No threat at all?

(Why does this make me think of David and Goliath?)

;-/


72 posted on 02/12/2012 4:51:48 PM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Oh you’re right about Obama and four more. America would be done.

I’m talking about Santorum’s record and his 06 campaign vs Mitt in Mass. Might surprise you.


73 posted on 02/12/2012 4:51:50 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

PublicPolicyPolling@ppppollsReply
Retweet

Favorite
· Open

Barring some big shift in tonight’s calls Santorum will be up by 10-15 on the Michigan poll


74 posted on 02/12/2012 4:55:03 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: VinL

VinL, I am thankful for what Newt accomplished as Speaker of the House. He is the absolute best candidate we have had running for president since Reagan. Would bet that Sarah feels the same way.

As for me...I will fight for Newt until the very end. IF Newt loses the gop nomination...I am done with politics. Has America been so dumbed down that they are willing to sacrifice this nation to Obama or Romney? it will be the end of the country I love so much.


75 posted on 02/12/2012 4:56:17 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Maybe the fix is in.


76 posted on 02/12/2012 4:57:11 PM PST by McGruff (GO NEWT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
Correction: Willard ran 13,000 TV ads to Newt's 200 ...

Why was Newt so ill-prepared for his run? Why wasn't he more organized early-on? Why did he start raising money so late?

77 posted on 02/12/2012 4:59:22 PM PST by Arkady Orinko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GoCards
I get Jim has endorsed Newt but geez guys. Like it or not Santorum is in this race and doing not bad...

Santorum is in this race and...doing better than Newt! That's why his supporters are behaving like mean, vengeful children.

78 posted on 02/12/2012 4:59:54 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Taxachusan
http://libertarian-neocon.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-conservative-is-newts-actual-voting.html •Voted YES on the Reagan tax cut of 1981 •Voted YES on the Reagan tax reform bill of 1986 •Voted NO on the George H.W. Bush "Read My Lips" tax hike in 1990. •Voted NO on the Clinton tax hike in 1993. •Voted YES on the capital gains tax cut in 1997. •Voted NO on the Chrysler bailout in 1979 •Voted YES on the Gramm-Rudman balanced budget bill in 1985 •Voted YES on a balanced budget amendment (as part of the "Contract for America" effort that he led) in 1995 •Led the effort and voted YES to cut $16.4 billion from the budget in 1995. •Voted YES on welfare reform in 1996 GO NEWT!
79 posted on 02/12/2012 5:04:32 PM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: VinL

.

Santorum:
Voted AGAINST increasing the number of immigration investigators:
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00201

VOTED AGAINST HIRING AN ADDITIONAL 1,000 BORDER PATROL AGENTS, paid for by reductions in state grants.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00179

VOTED TO GIVE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=105&session=1&vote=00058

Voted to allow illegal immigrants to receive the earned income credit before becoming citizens.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00154

SANTORUM: Trim Social Security now- even if painful.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j7O34Bpp42k-IlMMNiOLBkYF2zNw?docId=b1cff9ecefe24ca6ae1764a09761e361

VOTED AGAINST FOOD STAMP REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00353

VOTED AGAINST MEDICAID REFORM
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=1&vote=00352

Voted to increase the social services block grant from $1 BILLION to $2 BILLION
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00302

VOTED TO RAID SOCIAL SECURITY instead of using surpluses to pay down the debt.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=2&vote=00056

Voted to impose a uniform federal tax mandate on states to force them to allow convicted , rapists, arsonists drug kingpins and all other ex-convicts to vote in federal elections.
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=107&session=2&vote=00031
.
Santorum; Big government spender:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt6XCZz2X1Y&feature=player_embedded
__________________________
.

Pop quiz: Which Republican presidential candidate supported the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor?
Hint: It’s the same one who endorsed a pro-abortion-rights presidential candidate in an earlier campaign.
Give up? The answer is Rick Santorum.

Santorum not only supported Specter. He ran an ad for him.
“Arlen is with us on the votes that matter,” Santorum said in an ad for Specter. “I’m proud to endorse Arlen Specter.”

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/02/which-republican-presidential-candidate-supported-sotomayor/

__________________________

This is only part of it. Santorum has not been properly vetted.
Even before this RINO voting record above came out,
he stuck me as a petty, egotistical little weasel

He needs to put his ego aside, put his country before himself and drop out.

.

.


80 posted on 02/12/2012 5:04:57 PM PST by patriot08 (TEXAS GAL- born and bred and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson