Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin -- It's Time to Endorse Newt for South Carolina -- STOP Mitt Romney NOW !
2012-01-16 | Patton@Bastogne

Posted on 01/16/2012 8:48:15 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: fieldmarshaldj
Correct. Michael Savage has a very logical explanation of just why Newt is unelectable.

Policywise, I'm not all that convinced he would be all that different from Mitt Romney either.

Santorum is clearly the best choice of the candidates still standing.

Any of them (even the moonbat Ron Paul) are still better choices than Obozo.

41 posted on 01/16/2012 10:15:13 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

How about she just keep silent and endorse “none of the above.” It doesn’t matter because her political career is over anyway.


42 posted on 01/16/2012 10:16:21 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
She has become just another former politician.

Yup, sad but true. So much for her silly catch phrase about "not needing a title"...

43 posted on 01/16/2012 10:19:14 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]




Click the Pic

End Freepathons!
Sheesh!! Do It Now!


Donate today
SIR! MONTHLY, SIR!

Sponsors will donate $10
For each new monthly sign-up

44 posted on 01/16/2012 10:23:00 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
In my book Newt isn’t much better than Mitt.

It depends on which version of Newt you are getting. The firebrand who led the takeover of congress in 1994? Or the milquetoast who rolled over for the Clintons a few years later and allowed himself to be driven from office with a comparable bimbo eruption?

It also depends on which version of Mitt Romney you are getting. The savvy businessman who organized or reorganized a number of companies and saved the 2002 winter Olympics? Or the failed governor or Taxachussetts who helped mid-wife a state version of ObamaCare?

The point is that nobody knows. Rick Santorum has far fewer warts than either and is basically what you see is what you get.

45 posted on 01/16/2012 10:23:55 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar
.



Let's pause from our scheduled Newscast for some quaint Political Humor for the 2012 United States Presidential Election ... as channeled by President Ronald Reagan ...


Barack Obama (The Kenyan) walks into a Bank, and decides to rob its's Customers ... one at a time ...

The Local Police (naturally) are attending a "New Black Panthers" anniversary party hosted by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder ... and his "Radical Islamic Friends of Palestine" fan-club ...

One by One, "The Kenyan" empties the purses and wallets of the (increasing angry) bank customers ... with his prime (political) focus being the Ecomonic and Political Destruction of the United States of America ...




Dr. Winkie (Ron Paul) goes along with the Robbery, because like "The Kenyan", Dr. Winkie also loves the Iranian Mullah's Nuclear Weapons Program, hates Israel, and this is Dr. Winkie's "big chance" (as per Pee Wee Herman) for his Andy Warhol "fifteen minutes of fame" on the local TV news that evening ...



Mitt Romney, however ... is looking at the opportunity to steal "The Kenyan's" gun ... and become the National Robber Baron himself ... just as he did at Bain Capital ...

So our anti-hero Mitt Romney just smiles ... and smiles ... and smiles ...

reassuraing the Customers that "The Kenyan" is REALLY A NICE MAN ...

while Mitt Romney thinks about his (secret) $ 190 million dollar "Bain Capital" personal fortune, safely hidden in the European Swiss Bank next door.




Newt Ginrich is angry ... and increasingly so ... "Smiling Mitt" doesn't understand Why ????

But wouldn't you be Angry too ?

And ...what happens to "You" ... in this narrative ?




Unfortunately, "The Kenyan" robbed you of one-hundred dollars ... $ 100 ... in a political sense, of course ... with Higher Taxes, a Destroyed Economy, Military DEFEAT in Afghanistan and Iraq ...




Now ... here's your choice ...

Would you rather have Newt Gingrich or Mitt "Pro-Abortion and Gay Marriage" Romney return the one-hundred dollars to you ... that "The Kenyan" robbed you of ?



Remember, now ... that ...Mitt Romney proudly declared in 1994 to Massachusetts citizens that he WOULD NEVER BE GUILTY of "trying to return" to President Ronald Reagan's policies of phenominal job growth, smaller government, tax reduction, and America's international security.




Newt Gingrich ?

He HAS A CONCRETE PLAN ... and has the "Political Legislative Experience" (In the trenches) to KNOW how to get vital Legislation PASSED -- not merely debated --

And has that Legislation ALREADY WRITTEN to have submitted to Congress ... on Day-One of his Presidency



With that NEW "Day-One" legislation to include:


1) Abolish the EPA
2) FIRE Federal Reserve Banker Bernacke
3) Actively protect America against Isalmic Jihad

4) Prayer in the Public Schools -- RETURNED
5) Liberal (Activist) Federal Judges REMOVED

6) Business Corporate Tax Rate LOWERED to 12-percent
7) Individuals to have FLAT-TAX option at 15-percent

8) Promote U.S. Energy Independence -- DOMESTICALLY


9) Build EFFECTIVE U.S. Border Protection by 2015
10) Illegal Immigrants (especially violent gangs) DEPORTED
11) "English" established as the ONLY official language of the U.S. Government


12) U.S. Military "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" ... RE-INSTATED
13) U.S. Military weapon design-procurement cycle reformed


14) Democratic "Dodd-Frank" Legislation REPEALED
15) Democratic "Sarbanes-Oxley" Legislation REPEALED





Now ... Let's fast-forward to 2016 ... PRAYING that the GOP - Tea Party coalition won CONTROL of the Presidency, U.S. House and Senate.

What if by 2016 Newt Gingrich's leadership ... and KEPT PROMISES ... resulted ONLY in items 1-15 (above) being enacted ... INTO LAW ?




Is "Your" America safer, more prosperous than today ?

Is "Your Childrens'" America safer, more prosperous than today ?



Can or Will Barack Obama accomplish those goals ? "NO"



Can or Will Mitt Romney accomplish those goals ? "NO"

Can or Will Dr. Winkie (Ron Paul) accomplish those goals ? "NO"

Can or Will Rick Santorum accomplish those goals ? "NO"



Can or Will The Libertarian Party accomplish those goals ?
Can or Will The Constitution Party accomplish those goals ? "NO"




==================================


So WHAT are we to do ? How do we Vote ?



I say ... take the Candidate with the 90-percent solution ... over Candidates B-C-D-E with their measily 5-percent solutions ...


Is it perfect ? Nope ...


But what would you rather have in your pocket ... if someone (genuinely) owed you $ 100 ?


$ 90.00 or "Zero" ????


And here's the "kicker" to that math problem ...

If re-elected ... Obama "The Socialist Kenyan" will STEAL another $ 200 from your pocket ... when he grants Citizenship to 25 million Illegal Immigrants ...

And if elected ... Mitt "I Love Gay Rights" Romney ... and the GOP E-RINOs ... will only steal $ 100 from your pocket ... when he grants Citizenship to 12.5 million Illegal Immigrants ...

And once those 12.5 to 25 million Illegal Immigrants are "SOCIALIST DEMOCRATIC VOTERS" ... you can KISS AMERIKA GOODBYE ...



==================================





.

46 posted on 01/16/2012 10:24:50 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Sarah seems to have lost the fire. Don’t know why.

_______________________________________

Look at the timing.

She quit her "is she in or is she out" dance right after the publication of the book about her and todd. They threatened to sue but did nothing...and then she quit.

Draw your own conclusion.

47 posted on 01/16/2012 10:26:17 AM PST by moose-matson (I keep it in my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NKP_Vet
If Sarah Palin wants to make a difference she endorses Newt now. It will be too late after SC. If Mitt the Liberal wins SC by splintering the votes the nomination is his....

O.M.G. We're all gonna DIE! < /hysterics >

You're being set up by the media and the GOP-E.

48 posted on 01/16/2012 10:26:54 AM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: antonico
If Palin endorses that, then her own career credibility takes a huge hit.

_____________________________________

What is less than zero?

49 posted on 01/16/2012 10:28:05 AM PST by moose-matson (I keep it in my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

I hate to say it but I think she will eventually endorse Mitt Romney......she has waited to late in the process for her endorsement to help. If she had endorsed one of the more conservatives from the start it would have helped!!


50 posted on 01/16/2012 10:29:34 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Another thought. Is she keeping quiet to preserve her chance of being a VP pick? If she speaks too soon and endorses the wrong guy she could blow that up.

______________________________________

Oh, are you suggesting that she is holding off on an endorsement in order to maximize her own personal benefit?

You know, as opposed to doing what's right for America...

51 posted on 01/16/2012 10:30:38 AM PST by moose-matson (I keep it in my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
Newt has gained strength in the past several days. He now trails Romney by about 4 points. Santorum is an idiot for knowingly splitting the Conservative vote. The pathetic thing is, Santorum was never very fiscally Conservative during his term as Senator. Yet he us getting all this support for such.

Both Perry and Santorum need to get out. They will only stop Newt in SC where the last stand is critical. Newt needs SC, or he can't win the nomination.

This is turning out to be a disaster, and idiots like Santorum and Perry are too stubborn to give a damn.

52 posted on 01/16/2012 10:32:57 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

In a Fox interview a couple days ago, Sarah pretty much said she won’t be endorsing anyone during the primaries, in case it might do more harm for the candidate than good.


53 posted on 01/16/2012 10:36:13 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Your premise is flawed in that long diatribe. You assume that Rombama or McGingrich can beat Obama. Neither of them have the consistency in their stands over the last few years to do so. Anyone but Obama works with the committed, but for the majority of the people, an alternative has to be offered or they will vote for the Kenyan.


54 posted on 01/16/2012 10:41:55 AM PST by Ingtar (If the GOP wants my vote, they should start fielding candidate for whom I can vote - Jemian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

Both Romney and McGingrich need to get out...


55 posted on 01/16/2012 10:44:46 AM PST by Ingtar (If the GOP wants my vote, they should start fielding candidate for whom I can vote - Jemian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

The point is that nobody knows. Rick Santorum has far fewer warts than either and is basically what you see is what you get.

Now your talking!

I’ll vote for Rick. Newt and Mitt can go pound sand. If that means we get Obama for 4 more, so be it. I will not vote for a white totalitarian elitist on an ego trip. Nor will I vote for a black totalitarian elitist on an ego trip.


56 posted on 01/16/2012 10:55:33 AM PST by chainsaw (Sarah Palin is still my first choice to save the USA. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

Palin 100% disagrees with you by not endorsing Santorum.


57 posted on 01/16/2012 11:03:35 AM PST by CainConservative (Newt/Santorum 2012 with Cain, Huck, Petraeus, Parker, Watts, Duncan, & Bachmann in Newt's Cabinet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

It would be much better if Sarah endorsed the conservative candidate instead - Rick Santorum.


58 posted on 01/16/2012 11:05:29 AM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antonico
Gingrich used to stand for Conservatism on principle. He now stands for Conservatism out of political expediency, which is the same reason he starts moving leftward. Gingrich thinks today that a leftward shift on many issues endears him to a press he hopes will buy whatever book he’s got coming out.He is a huge loose cannon, and despite all his better qualities, Gingrich’s ultimate problem is that he believes in Federal Government Solutions to problems that could be better addressed either more locally, or - in the best possible scenario - privately. He aint what he used to be.

Very well stated.

59 posted on 01/16/2012 11:07:45 AM PST by Hoodat (Because they do not change, Therefore they do not fear God. -Psalm 55:19-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
I’ll vote for Rick. Newt and Mitt can go pound sand. If that means we get Obama for 4 more, so be it. I will not vote for a white totalitarian elitist on an ego trip. Nor will I vote for a black totalitarian elitist on an ego trip.

So you want the SC full of commies. That's something you can be proud about, right?

60 posted on 01/16/2012 11:15:30 AM PST by Digger (If RINO is your selection then failure is your election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson