Posted on 04/19/2011 7:15:26 AM PDT by Realman30
Anything evil is usually detected by, and hated by, dogs.
I have found that most dogs that have been well socialized tend to be very good judges of character. I assume this to be part of the protective nature of most dogs.
Anything evil is usually detected by, and hated by, dogs.
I have found that most dogs that have been well socialized tend to be very good judges of character. I assume this to be part of the protective nature of most dogs.
What a bunch of wackadoodles. Dogs sense evil & these demons know it. I feel sorry for the children who will have their beloved dogs ripped from them. B@stards!
They need to kick out or kill all the diseased muzzies, outlaw Islam and reinstate their Persian culture.
Sounds like a great plan to me!
Nothing against cats as animals, but, wouldn't surprise me if Mo was a 'cat owner'. Cats are considered 'clean/pure' in Islam, mostly, because they clean themselves.
Generally speaking, more Moslem-Iranians are cat owners than dog owners. Sometimes, it amazes me that some Iranians (Persians) - who never cease to claim they've centuries of pre-Islamic civilization - continue to worship the cult of a bunch of primitive, desert-dwelling, lizard eating, moslem-arabs, of which Mo was very much part of, in his hashemite-arab tribe/clan. What else would one expect from a bunch of bedouin Moslem-Arabs, who were sufficiently violent & successful in spreading & imposing their unethical & retarded culture on others ..
Personally, I've never heard of a "cat being man's best friend".
That’d be outstanding. Tho, many moslem-Iranians, no matter how secular or anti-regime, they may appear, often can’t help themselves. It is a matter of centuries of indoctrination (conditioning) – ongoing (forced by different means) cultural change. Firstly, thru general Islamic teachings (post-Arab invasion), and, then, after they were forced to become Shia Moslems circa late 16th century AD (during Safavid dynasty in Iran). During the latter part, they were often prompted to say “Ali is Vali” i.e. “Ali [the 1st shia Imam], is the Guardian”. It has stuck w/ them ever since, thru generations – reinforced fully in the past 32 yrs by the mullahs' regime & their propaganda. It has been/is part of the norm in Iran. Unfortunately, even among many Monarchists today, both inside & outside Iran.
I had a related conversation w/ one Moslem-Iranian a couple of yrs ago. He said he immigrated to & has lived in the US since the 1970’s. He also said that he came from an upper-middle class moslem-Iranian family.
As an example, he told me: “when I mean to be honest/sincere I, automatically, say “be joone Ali nakardam”, meaning “I swear to Ali I didn’t do it”. “Not that I want to say Ali, but his name automatically pops up in my head & speech.” He continued: “ I became very conscious of it. As a result, ever since the birth of my first daughter, I’ve made a conscious effort to not only not mention 'Ali' or any of the Islamic figures in front of my daughter & sons.
but also to teach them never to mention them in their speech.”
P.S. - Just to complete the last paragragh & quote of the previous post... Hit the ‘post’ button accidentally then.
Thank you for a very interesting and illuminating post. I wonder; is he still a Muslim but with a tempered view of things? I see Islam as a poison and it has infected Persia, India and other lands for many centuries. Like poison in the body it will take time to be cleansed out and the damage healed but first the source of it has to be cut off. Chelation and anti-biotics is only a stopgap if you still have an IV drip of hemlock and bacteria in the other arm.
This is just my own opinion, and observations: I don’t think many moslem-Iranians are ‘moslems’, apart from being moslem-born. That is to say they are not practicing moslems. In the West the difference between moslem-Iranians & moslem-Arabs is often viewed as ‘shia vs sunni’. That may be the case to some extent, but largely it is also a distortion of the truth & historical events.
Would even go further and say that many moslem-Iranians are often confused & don’t have a real understanding of Islamic teachings (especially in Iranian context). Because, once they were, largely, forced to become moslems (centuries ago), they, mostly, decided to do so to save their lives & livelihood. That pretense, superficial Islamic practices, kept going out of necessity. Same time, they were adamant to keep their *distinct cultural identity*, mostly hidden, to preserve their core (non-Islamic) beliefs. Iranian tradition has mostly been that of *oral* relaying of beliefs & practices, from one generation to another; particularly because post-Islam Iran has been subjected to foreign invasions - most notable ones being Arabs & Monghols. Those invaders burned many books & libraries.
It’s difficult to fully articulate it in a few posts. One has to be aware of *details* & so-called the *fine print* to fully understand it. I can give numerous related examples tho.
I thank you for what you have told. It is a lot and paints a very understandable picture. It says almost as much about Islam too as it does about the Iranians reinforcing my opinion that Islam is just neurotic poison to the mind.
Thank you for the interesting posts. I enjoy learning about such things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.