It is sad that the “establishment” used a whole generation of pre-teen girls as experimental subjects for this dangerous drug.
Especially ASSUMING they would be sexually promiscuous at an early age and would need protection from a std before attending high school even.
Would it not be easier and more responsible to teach young girls to respect themselves and their bodies, and save themselves for their one true love?
Best deterrant for std’s ever invented!
Do you assume that every child will step on a nail because you give them a tetanus shot?
How about the Hepatitis B shot they get as newborns? Do you assume (can’t bring myself to do the all caps) that the neonates will be exposed to blood and body fluids (STD or IV drugs?)?
If you know a woman who had cervical cancer or had to have “freezing” or laser therapy, you know a woman who had changes due to HPV.
Yes - that would be better. Evidently that does not fit the agenda of those who want to destroy the lives of girls/women and/or the babies they might bear if their sexual promiscuity is not stopped.