Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who was the drag on the GOP ticket?

Posted on 11/05/2008 7:58:38 AM PST by publius_in_abq

Let's begin the soul-searching. A month ago, I agreed with most pundits that McCain was the only candidate who had a chance to make this race close. I am beginning to doubt this now. McCain barely won his own state of AZ, and lost Iowa (due to ethanol subsidy opposition) and neighboring SW homestates of CO and NM, and barely won TX (12% spread!) and GA (5%). McCain also lost Ohio and FL soundly and was drubbed in PA.

I was deeply disappointed in Palin's debate with Biden (gave her a B-) and her interview with Couric was cringe-inducing (couldn't name a single magazine she reads, and over the course of weeks couldn't come up with one decent answer as to how living next to Russia gives her foreign policy experience). But I still don't think she was the drag on this ticket. She is inexperienced in terms of the national scene. But she was the fighter on the team, while McCain was less so. So I am still unsure...who was the drag on the ticket? Or would no one have fared better than these two against BO?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: election; katietheclown; mccain; obama; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: DouglasKC
The Republican party is ashamed of conservatives. They're ashamed of the right. They're apologetic about people like Palin expressing her views.

The Republican brain-trust better re-think that position. A couple more presidential election cycles like this last one & there might not be a Republican party.

41 posted on 11/05/2008 8:17:25 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: publius_in_abq

My vote was an anti-Obama vote...and I’m not afraid to admit it. I can’t get very excited about a “across the aisle” candidate. I want someone who WON’T reach across the aisle. Their were two drags on this ticket...the fact that Bush is a republican( and people somehow believe he is to blame for the economy) and McCain.


42 posted on 11/05/2008 8:19:25 AM PST by housewife101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius_in_abq

Palin wasn’t the problem. McCain was the wrong person at the top of the ticket. We needed a Washington outsider to blunt the connections to Bush. When they ran those “I voted with Bush 90% of the time” ads against McCain it was not very helpful. <-—understatement alert


43 posted on 11/05/2008 8:19:44 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius_in_abq
#1 Economy blows up 6 weeks before the election due to the Democrat law changes earlier in bank financing.
Democrats fault, but they were just looking at President Bush. Being they were mostly tired of a war they took it out on Republicans.
#2 Billions of free press by the newspapers and networks 6 to 1 for Obama, along with an almost total cover up of Obama’s background that was all bad.
#3 Democrats and Independents crossing over in Republican primaries to choose our Republican McCain.
More than likely it would have been Romney, and when the economy crashed 6 weeks before the election, Romney would have been the great Republican in place at that time.

That said, McCain tried hard and we had the pleasure of discovering Sarah Palin who could conceivably be President in 2012.

44 posted on 11/05/2008 8:20:00 AM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

BINGO! Yes the press picked our candidate. The press picked their candidate. The press hand carried Obama to the White House. Now is the time to do something about it. Lets attack their advertisers. There was a poll that stated 7 to 1 that the public believes that the press is biased. My 87 year old mother saw it with Katie Couric interviewing Sarah. Now if an 87 year old woman can see it why can’t the rest of America see it. LETS TO SOMETHING!


45 posted on 11/05/2008 8:21:34 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

McCain and the RNC were not pro-active on the issues.

They all saw the economic downturn coming and should have used it before October. The fact of Democratic complicity would not have been just brushed off a “blame laying”.


46 posted on 11/05/2008 8:21:44 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: publius_in_abq
Hey, I look forward to the huge upswing in American optimism and the happy, happy economic headlines that will cheer us for the next 4 years. None of that nasty "recession" crap or "Wrong Track/Right Track ickiness!

The press and Chris Matthews will be taking a vacation from doom and gloom and all we had to do was elect a Marxist Democrat. It was so worth it, kids!

Sorry General Petraeus, your services will no longer be required...we gots us a peace-loving advocate of Hope and Change.

It's CHICKEN and WAFFLES for everyone!!!

47 posted on 11/05/2008 8:22:01 AM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius_in_abq

The drag was not a person, issue or event. these are all secondary. the drag was campaign finance reform and McCain’s stubborn selfish position on campaign spending. If you were to double McCain’s expenditures on GOTV, issue ads, pavement pounders and campaign presence - still keeping McCain at a financial disadvantage to Obama, Indiana, Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, and Virginia would have gone differently. Probably would have coattailed a few legislators with him. Add Private organization issue adds lost by McCain/Feingold - and it is clear. double McCains campaign spending in the last few months and double issue ads and the idiotic punditry would be chatting now about how McCain’s issue positions were what the american people really wanted, despite the massive turnout. McCain stood in front of the claymore he set when he linked up with Feingold and took out several friendlies with him.


48 posted on 11/05/2008 8:22:38 AM PST by angrymarine (I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Me, too. I was planning to sit this one out until McC brought Palin on board.

So were a lot of evangelicals and true conservatives.

Sarah brought life and vibrancy into the campaign. Anyone who saw her in person realizes she is a truly charismatic person.

Without her, McCain would have lost many more states than he did.


49 posted on 11/05/2008 8:23:18 AM PST by Palladin (Obama on Ayers: "He's just a guy in my neighborhood." LIAR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

IMO the real reason that we didn’t win was us, not them.
The RNC, current or past presidents or conservative talk radio did not get behind the republican unless, as an example, all 10 criteria are met - this is a direct paraphrase from Limbaugh. McCain did not meet all ten requirements, thus we got beat by a competitor that did. We all know that the Clintons HATE obama, but they did stump for them. We need to be behind our candidate, just as ALL of the dems are behind theirs - PERIOD. In reality we didn’t lose by all that much, imagine what would have happened if the RNC REALLY got behind the McCain/Palin ticket....
In football when the defense is stopping the run up the middle don’t you change your game plan at half-time? I know I start hitting them with short screens in the flats and runs to the outside holes along with some stunts by the O-line on the second level (LB’s) making them ineffective.
The RNC needs to draft the youth movement like the dems do.


50 posted on 11/05/2008 8:23:46 AM PST by Cyclone59 (It is amazing how people are comforted by percentages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: publius_in_abq
McCain barely won his own state of AZ

Playing a little fast and loose with the facts, aren't ya? McCain carried AZ by 9% in a state that is trending blue with a HUGE Hispanic population. That's a decisive win. And, yes, he lost Ohio and Florida, but he wasn't defeated "soundly."

51 posted on 11/05/2008 8:24:16 AM PST by Flycatcher (Strong copy for a strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bartholomew Roberts

was it schmidt that decided mccain shouldn’t talk about wright?


52 posted on 11/05/2008 8:24:46 AM PST by outlawjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bcsco
What I believed happened is Independents swung more to Obama than McCain. The GOP/McCain simply didn't have an inspiring policy. Neither did Obama but he's far more charismatic. Sarah was what gave the GOP the votes it got. But those came from the base; not voting for the GOP ticket but for her and in fear of Obama.

I'd say Palin didn't bring in votes. She only exchanged them. Palin brought the so-called "base" back in, while chasing away the independents/moderates who gave McCain his win. I know independent voters who planned to vote for McCain and didn't due to Palin.

I've reached the conclusion that the "base" is not fiscally conservative at all. They're only conservative on social issues, I presume. Palin was the reason I almost didn't vote at all. (She is not a fiscal conservative, plus she turned the GOP feminist overnight, and I know other Republicans who have the same opinion.) I had to drag myself to the polls and begrudgingly pull the lever for McCain.

53 posted on 11/05/2008 8:25:24 AM PST by Tired of Taxes (Dad, I will always think of you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nickname
I would proudly vote for Sarah again, if she decides to run. McCain lost because he was outspent, out hustled, the MSM, being a quasi-RINO, ill tempered, poorly managed campaign, timid in campaigning against Obama, (just look at the Rev. Wright issue he was handed, but refused), and I think just being a real dumbass and not challenging Obama every time Obama bashed President Bush. All I heard McCain say was “I disagreed with my own party numerous times!”, or something to that effect. In summary, McCain went from being a real hero to being a real zero in three months.
54 posted on 11/05/2008 8:26:03 AM PST by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

turns out according to exit polls.. that palin boosted mccain by 4% of the people who thought she mattered..


55 posted on 11/05/2008 8:27:32 AM PST by outlawjake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: DemonDeac
The Obama camp had their act together. They ran a very focused and organized GOTV organization and kept on a consistent theme. Ground level politics won it for Bush and losing that battle lost it for McCain.

I believe we need to have a HUGE GOTV effort for 2012 in...

California.

Think about it. There are myriad ways for conservatives to win a national election without California. There is NO way for a democrat to win without California. If we can turn California red, it's game, set, match.

56 posted on 11/05/2008 8:27:58 AM PST by Terabitten (...to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Peter Horry

You can’t figure out the right path without looking at the wrong turns. If you don’t learn from your mistakes...you will repeat them. You have to discuss the wrong turns to learn what NOT to do again.


57 posted on 11/05/2008 8:29:09 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

“Think about it. There are myriad ways for conservatives to win a national election without California. There is NO way for a democrat to win without California. If we can turn California red, it’s game, set, match. “

That would be a coup. But stranger things have happened. Ten years ago the idea of Virginia having two Democrat senators, a Dem gov, and going Dem in a general would have been unthinkable. And California does have a history with the party. Two Republican presidents in the last 40 years were from Cali.

As much as we laughed at it at the time, it appears that Howard Dean’s 50 state strategy was not a waste of resources. They did expand the playing field. Lets try to do the same.


58 posted on 11/05/2008 8:30:50 AM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

Well, I know it’s hard to embrace, but you’re in the minority. Palin rallied the conservative base. The GOP/McCain was able to get 48% of the vote because of her, in part. If you look at the rallies, the attention they drew, it was because of her; not McCain. McCain’s just another centrist among a party full of centrists. He’s not conservative and neither is the GOP. No, Palin DID bring in votes. Just not the Independents. And that doesn’t mean her place on the ticket was the cause of that. I believe the cause was because the GOP/McCain provided nothing to vote FOR.


59 posted on 11/05/2008 8:32:04 AM PST by bcsco (Liberals don't understand, it's impossible to pick up a turd-like Obama-by the clean end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: outlawjake

Yep, that’s the guy. He set up so many things they COULDN’T talk about that there wasn’t much left.

He and Salter set up the suspension of the campaign with no end game in sight. So McCain goes to DC with nothing to say, the ground game gets suspended, even some staffers were laid off for a few days.

That moron had no clue how to run a campaign.


60 posted on 11/05/2008 8:33:16 AM PST by Bartholomew Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson