Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Book! Why Evolution is a Fraud: A Secular and Common-Sense Deconstruction by Tom Sutcliff
http://www.evofraud.com ^ | 2007 | Tom Sutcliff

Posted on 05/21/2007 9:33:13 PM PDT by LoserPays3000

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: LH8993

A small part. It’s mostly found in the human sciences.


61 posted on 08/02/2007 7:43:48 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Could you clarify what you mean by the ‘human sciences?’ Thanks.


62 posted on 08/04/2007 5:04:55 PM PDT by LH8993 (evolution, phony science, global warming, coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: LH8993
the ‘human sciences

social science
political science
psychology
historical science

63 posted on 08/05/2007 7:29:52 AM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

So you would classify evolution as more akin to a social science than biology?


64 posted on 08/10/2007 12:44:59 PM PDT by LH8993 (evolution, phony science, global warming, coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: LH8993

It gets more use in philosophy and social science. It gets used in biology mainly in systems of classification. It is not akin to a social science or biology since it is not a science nor a theory but a law. It is somewhat beyond a mere rule but remains heuristic.


65 posted on 08/10/2007 12:52:29 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Definitely more philosophy than science! The classification structure is not what people think of, in my view, when the term ‘evolution’ comes up.


66 posted on 08/17/2007 2:43:22 PM PDT by LH8993 (evolution, phony science, global warming, coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: LH8993

I agree. The classification system is not what people have an issue with. It’s the unscientific idea that genetic copying errors could add up to a directional and progressively more advanced set of species. It does not matter how many billions of years or trillions of generations pass, this mechanism does not work.


67 posted on 10/17/2007 3:05:12 PM PDT by LoserPays3000 (http://www.evofraud.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson