Should Be a Headline: German Autopsy Study Finds EVERY Coronavirus Victim had Previous Illness — All Had Cancer, Lung Disease, Were Heavy Smokers or Morbidly Obese

Gateway Pundit ^ | 05/11/2020 | Jim Hoft

[SeekAndFind]

The Gateway Pundit was first to report back on March 16, 2020, that the WHO was pushing a completely inaccurate coronavirus mortality rate to frighten the masses.

The WHO Director, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, estimated on March 3, 2020 that the coronavirus mortality rate was 3.4% This was a completely inaccurate number that caused a global panic.

In Switzerland children went back to school on Monday since researchers found that children rarely get virus or transmit it.

Switzerland rolls back coronavirus lockdown earlier than expected. Schools to reopen since children rarely get virus or transmit it. Even better, Swiss tell those over 65 they can resume their lives. https://t.co/y9QrXP1Jmc via @TheLocalSwitzer

— Robbie Sherman (@RobbieSherman77) May 11, 2020

Now a new study from Germany found that every single death was someone who had cancer, lung disease, was a heavy smoker or morbidly obese.

Via Dr. Andrew Bostom.

Head of Forensic Pathology in Hamburg on covid19 autopsy findings: “not a single person w/out previous illness has died of the virus in Hamburg. All had cancer, chronic lung dis, were heavy smokers or heavily obese, or had diabetes or cardiovasc dis" 1/3 https://t.co/u4Pi9ntRT0 pic.twitter.com/PaSdh2UnF5

— Andrew Bostom (@andrewbostom) May 11, 2020

3/3 "By focusing strongly on the rather few negative processes, fears are created that are very burdensome. Covid-19 is a deadly disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a mostly harmless virus infection"

— Andrew Bostom (@andrewbostom) May 11, 2020

We are seeing this a lot lately.

Add it to the pile:

New York City: 99% of fatalities of all age groups had underlying conditions
Italy: 98%
Britain: 95%https://t.co/uAhgn5I9anhttps://t.co/sxqTq51mvkhttps://t.co/TUNgUyFcJf

— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) May 11, 2020

Ninety-five percent of people who have died with COVID-19 in hospitals in England had underlying health issues, according to figures obtained by Sky News.

The data provided by NHS England shows that, as of 5pm on 26 April, 18,749 people had died in hospital with the virus.

In a small number of cases, it was not possible to confirm if a patient did or did not have an underlying health condition.

But for those where it was, 95% were found to have serious pre-existing issues.

In patients over 80-years-old this figure was 96%, 60-79-years-old 95%, 40-59-years-old 88% and 20-39-years-old 82%.

The breakdown for those under the age of 20 who have died cannot be disclosed as the sample is so small it would breach patient confidentiality rules to distinguish between those with or without pre-existing conditions.

The data does not include hospital deaths in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, in the community or in care homes.

[Paladin2]

Where or where is “exspurt” Fauxcy?

Data and “Science” incoming.

[dljordan]

They don’t want to hear it. The globalists see this as their chance at ultimate power through medical martial law and they’re not letting go. I wonder what they promised our politicians?

[absalom01]

So China murdered the sick and elderly in the West.

I’m not OK with that.

This is an act of war, and China must be held to account.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: So China murdered the sick and elderly in the West.

The mortality profile is the same everywhere, even in China.

[ncpatriot]

I want to know why Dr Fauci panicked everybody. Apparently, the world did not have to close. What did Fauci know and Why did he do it?

Answers now, buddy

[AC86UT89]

Is this story true?

The reason I ask is that it’s Gateway Pundit.

[absalom01]

Well, since they haven’t given any real numbers, and haven’t let the outside world in to check, that’s a reasonable assumption.

It’s also irrelevant.

They let this out of their incompetent lab, and then, when they knew what they had done, they lied about it.

They closed Wuhan off from the rest of China, and kept Wuhan open to the world.

That’s not solid proof, yet, but it’s pretty strong circumstantial evidence. Add to that president Trump’s assertion last week that this was an “attack”; he’s been briefed, and that wasn’t a slip of the tongue.

This is an act of war by a hostile foreign power. We must respond accordingly.

[Leaning Right]

I don’t have any problem at all with a coronavirus-related death being recorded just as a coronavirus death. If it were not for the coronavirus, those diabetes, heart, etc. patients would still be alive.

Record those deaths as coronavirus deaths. Make it crystal clear exactly how much damage the ChiComs have done to the United States, and to the rest of the world.

Makes Red China pay. Then they can go to hell.

[volunbeer]

I don’t trust GP nor will I go there because it is clickbait and I don’t want the spam and kludge on my computer.

However, this is likely a true story. It is in line with what many of us were yelling a month ago when saying we needed to be smarter about how we responded to this based on the real data that took into account demographics and health condition instead of the one-sized fits all plan based on NYC and nursing home deaths.

[volunbeer]

I think the left wants to damage Trump. Most of them to include the media (owned by China) will NOT tell us the truth about what China did.

[wildcard_redneck]

Red autumn leaves fall.
Was this murder by the wind?
Or was it their time?

[I want the USA back]

The powers that be wanted EVERYONE to be scared and anxious, and be easier to control. Their plan wouldn’t have worked if ONLY those with conditions were scared and anxious.

[dirtymac]

If it were not for the coronavirus, those diabetes, heart, etc. patients would still be alive.
_____________________________

That is not necessarily true. People have been dying of these and other chronic conditions for a long time and will continue to do so. some/many/lots of the death were not attributed originally to CV-19 but may have been an insignificant contributing factor.

[Wuli]

Instead of mandated sheltering and protection of the institutionalized elderly, and strongly recommending supporting the most vulnerable, the main U.S. approach was trying to shelter all the healthy from all the healthy but doing not much to insure the most vulnerable most of all were sheltered. What a waste.

No healthy adult without factors such as heart disease, respiratory diseases, cancers, diabetes, or obesity needed to be shut down in terms of their employment. Health safety measures such as masks and gloves would have been enough for them, just to help protect and vulnerable folk they come come into contact with.

While those with vulnerabilities ought to have masked and gloved themselves when out in public, for their own protection.

But zero businesses needed to close.

[Leaning Right]

I understand what you are saying. But if the coronavirus killed someone on a Tuesday, someone who would have been dead by Friday, I still would consider that to be a coronavirus death.

Consider this. A man is very, very ill because of diabetes. Someone breaks into his house, and beats him up. A healthy man would have easily survived that beating. But the diabetic does not. Who killed that man, diabetes or the burglar? I say it’s the burglar.

[brookwood]

The age-adjusted prevalence of obesity among U.S. adults was 42.4% in 2017–2018. The fatality rate from obesity is zero. That’s about 140 million people in the US. Among the other co-morbidities, there are 250 million people with either asthma, diabetes, hypertension or heart disease. The annual fatality rates for these are all .5% or below. Any fat dude who died of lung failure last week and is positive for Covid DIED OF COVID, give it up flubros, your are just being pathetic.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db360.htm

Diabetes https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/diabetes.htm
Lung Disease use stats for asthma
Cancer https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/common.html
Immunodeficiency https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4820073/
Heart Disease https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/01/190131084238.htm
Hypertension https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db289.htm
Asthma https://www.lung.org/research/trends-in-lung-disease/estimated-prevalence-and-incidence-of-lung-dis-(1)/methodology
Kidney Disease https://www.cdc.gov/kidneydisease/publications-resources/2019-national-facts.html
Liver Disease https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/liver-disease.htm

Pop with disease
Diabetes 34,200,000
Lung Disease use asthma
Cancer 2,800,000
Immunodeficiency 165,000
Heart Disease 121,500,000
Hypertension 95,700,000
Asthma 22,500,000
Kidney Disease 37,000,000
Liver Disease 4,500,000
222,665,000

Annual deaths from disease
Diabetes 83,000
Lung Disease
Cancer 606,000
Immunodeficiency 0
Heart Disease 647,000
Hypertension 472,000
Asthma 338
Kidney Disease 47,000
Liver Disease 82,500

Annual Death Rate
Diabetes 0.24%
Lung Disease see asthma
Cancer 21.64%
Immunodeficiency
Heart Disease 0.53%
Hypertension 0.49%
Asthma 0.00%
Kidney Disease 0.13%
Liver Disease 1.83%

[wildcard_redneck]

“I don’t trust GP nor will I go there because it is clickbait and I don’t want the spam and kludge on my computer.”

GP is good enough for President Trump to retweet. I find GP to be very informative and effective in fighting the globalist left, why don’t you?

[gov_bean_ counter]

Survival of the fittest

Maybe, just maybe every now and then Mother Nature jumps in and thins the herd...

[wildcard_redneck]

“The powers that be wanted EVERYONE to be scared and anxious, and be easier to control. Their plan wouldn’t have worked if ONLY those with conditions were scared and anxious.”

If you want the buffalo herd to go over the buffalo jump for slaughter you have to panic it first.