CBS Attempt to Fire ABC’s Whistleblower Goes Terribly Wrong

DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

[simpson96]

bookmark

[Thank You Rush]

“”The whistleblower wrote it after she was fired to make it clear they fired the wrong person.””

That doesn’t make sense. From the letter:

“”Second, project Veritas released the text of an open letter the actual whistleblower wrote to the public and his fellow employees at ABC, where he remains still employed””

The whistleblower “remains still employed” at ABC?

How does the whistleblower get fired and still remain employed there? I’m sorry but I still don’t understand.

Who’s on first?

[Chuckster]

She has built-in connections to O’Keefe and Veritas

She has no connection to O'Keefe. That's the point.

[imskylark]

The whistleblower wrote it after the wrong person was fired. The whistleblower was not fired. An innocent young lady who didn’t even know what Project Veritas was is the one who lost her job.

[Thank You Rush]

I understand - I think! It’s a matter of writing sentences that make sense. Whoever penned this “letter” could have said “after Bianco” was fired and not “after she was fired.” No wonder foreigners say our language is hard to learn. I know I make an effort to make sure my words and meaning are clear to everyone. Probably from years of my husband asking, “What’s it?” or “Who’s she/he?” And years at FR teaches one a lot about clarity also.

“”The whistleblower wrote it after she was fired to make it clear they fired the wrong person.””

[gogeo]

Yes, but it’s not actual guilt or innocence, but the seriousness of the charge.

[Mr. Jeeves]

So, the management thugs who hold power at ABC and CBS put an innocent employee out on the streets all as a result of their ongoing zeal to protect a convicted pedophile and his longtime associates and alleged customers.

Folks, it doesn’t get much lower than that.

In their minds, they did it to further The Revolution. And to them, a purpose doesn’t get much higher than that.