Posted on 05/18/2018 10:31:02 AM PDT by Impala64ssa
“The march may have originally been, as it was declared to be, about Palestinians returning to the homes they had to leave 70 years before.”
He should also apologize for not knowing history. They did not HAVE to leave. They left willingly so that their Jewish neighbors could be slaughtered. No sane person (or state) would allow them to return.
Most Jews still support the Democratic party. I report, you decide!
Every Jew I know and I know a lot of Jew are enthusiastic leftist Demorats. I can’t count a single Jewish conservative. I know they exist, including the Hasidim and perhaps some others, but I never see or hear them.
Never read the Breitbart website?
I don’t know anyone that writes there. And, I don’t know Pam Geller. And, I don’t know Mark Levin. I do know the 25 Jewish lawyers I worked for and their hundreds of family members and hundreds of Jewish clients we served and many many more. Not a Conservative among them.
Ping
So, he’s an emotional dumbass. Next.
Good to see that some who knee-jerk their reactions are able to step back and let reason take over....
Daniel Sugarman uses “I” as many times as any speech by Obama.
For good reason. He hopes more to draw attention to his wounded ego and monumental sensitivity than any truths about Gaza.
Thank God those he slurred in Israel are made of stronger stuff.
Liar! If he had such a pro-Israel bias as he claims, no way he'd have been suckered like that.
He is a liar.
The choice was, quite literally, shoot at people running at you with the stated aim of killing you and your families, or fail to shoot and let them do it.
I'm stunned - a liberal finally 'gets it'. Kayne's eyes are opening and so are Sugarman's... there IS hope.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.