Posted on 03/05/2018 3:00:25 PM PST by blueyon
The guy is a mentally ill loon.
Said maybe Trump is guilty of something.
Also called Sara Sanders a fat slob and unattractive.
Course the fool is making the rounds on CNN and MSNBC, but it’s quite apparent the clown hasn’t looked in a mirror for a good while.
Are you serious? LMAO
Someone needs to breakout a straight jacket.
The guy is a mentally ill clown.
Maybe he’s trying to disqualify himself by acting like a total idiot and making all kinds of crazy statements - even appearing drunk on CNN.
If Mueller puts any stock in what Nunberg might say, he’s truly grasping for straws. It’s laughable.
FUTURE SENATOR, Sam Nunberg !
He should run for Republican Senate for an instant win.
“She did lawyer up . And she conferred with her lawyer for 10 minutes before answering.”
the lawyer should be fired. and he/she must be another closet resistance member. Trump has been poorly served by all the legal beagles he has been advise to retain. i can’t believe Hope Hicks wasn’t told to use the hilliary defense. could HH be that naive to not recall that by saying you can’t recall has worked for the clintons forever?
Listen to his interview. He has extremely bad judgement. Instead of getting a lawyer he chose to get drunk and call CNN to deliver a drunken rant about how life is unfair.
Instead of meekly appearing and then saying nothing, he’s calling out the corrupt Mueller and company because he, like us is fed up with the corrupt system and unlike most of us, has the balls to actually do something instead of going the “safe” route.
Well - let me eat my words - other info says he’s a bit of a dingbat and has come off the assertion....apologies.
Usually Grand Jury testimony is sworn to secrecy but it does not prevent him from doing interviews where I would ask (if I were him) if one candidate is “10% guilty” of colluding with UAE (if that’s even a crime) and another candidate is “90% guilty”, should a special prosecutor focus 100% of their time trying to convict the 10% guy while completely ignoring the 90% one. It’s doubtful such a question comes up in the GJ because the prosecutor asks all the questions and often in the most slanted way possible to get a conviction. But I would be shouting this and other questions from the rooftops to illustrate how biased the Special Prosecutor is. If he wants to be a provocateur, that’s how I’d go about it.
Witnesses before grand juries are not under secrecy rules they way officials and jurors are. That’s why politically-charged cases are almost always leaked; some witness is going to like talking about what he was asked.
That should be kept in mind when seeing talk about the sealed indictments that come from grand juries.
Couldn’t agree more....now that I got the facts right and thought about it.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.