Posted on 11/21/2017 6:41:38 AM PST by davikkm
A pervasive anti-Conservative attitude has long been present in awards shows and ceremonies, but the exclusion of women who do not lean full tilt for the progressive ideology is more damaging to society than most. It is sad but true that young women look to places like Glamour for role-models and information, yet all they are being presented is carbon-copy ideologies in the guise of strong women.
This years winners included such divisive figures as Maxine Waters, the organizers of the Womens March, and Samantha Bee (who started the Nasty Woman T-shirt campaign to raise $1 million for Planned Parenthood).
It is now almost impossible for someone with views that are considered conservative or on the right to get airtime or exposure. Lets take a look at some of the marvelous things that the Glamour Award winners have managed.
(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...
I wouldn’t expect conservatives to be in “Glamour”. If it was a magazine called “Substance” we’d have a problem.
Shouldn’t women in glamour have at least some measurable amount of it?
This is like putting womens studies majors on the cover of engineering weekly.
Nasty Woman of the Year:
Well, Waters is certainly nasty looking. So they got that right.
If no conservative women are depicted there is no glamour. Only conservative women are glamorous. Liberal women may be pretty but glamour is another matter entirely. Glamour goes to the core of a woman. Liberal women have no core.
Probably a few tranny’s in the mix...
It seems that Mark Angelides misses the days of yesteryear, when he could read full throated conservative articles in Glamour Magazine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.