Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Glamour Women of the Year: Not a Conservative in Sight!
IWB ^ | Mark Angelides

Posted on 11/21/2017 6:41:38 AM PST by davikkm

A pervasive anti-Conservative attitude has long been present in awards shows and ceremonies, but the exclusion of women who do not lean full tilt for the “progressive” ideology is more damaging to society than most. It is sad but true that young women look to places like Glamour for role-models and information, yet all they are being presented is carbon-copy ideologies in the guise of “strong women.”

This year’s winners included such divisive figures as Maxine Waters, the organizers of the Women’s March, and Samantha Bee (who started the “Nasty Woman” T-shirt campaign to raise $1 million for Planned Parenthood).

It is now almost impossible for someone with views that are considered conservative or on the right to get airtime or exposure. Let’s take a look at some of the “marvelous” things that the Glamour Award winners have managed.

(Excerpt) Read more at investmentwatchblog.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: glamour; women

1 posted on 11/21/2017 6:41:38 AM PST by davikkm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: davikkm

I wouldn’t expect conservatives to be in “Glamour”. If it was a magazine called “Substance” we’d have a problem.


2 posted on 11/21/2017 6:49:20 AM PST by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Shouldn’t women in glamour have at least some measurable amount of it?

This is like putting womens studies majors on the cover of engineering weekly.


3 posted on 11/21/2017 6:52:48 AM PST by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: davikkm
The Left's Glamour Woman of the Year:

Nasty Woman of the Year:


4 posted on 11/21/2017 7:07:45 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Well, Waters is certainly nasty looking. So they got that right.


5 posted on 11/21/2017 7:16:44 AM PST by WKUHilltopper (WKU 2016 Boca Raton Bowl Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

If no conservative women are depicted there is no glamour. Only conservative women are glamorous. Liberal women may be pretty but glamour is another matter entirely. Glamour goes to the core of a woman. Liberal women have no core.


6 posted on 11/21/2017 7:36:11 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

Probably a few tranny’s in the mix...


7 posted on 11/21/2017 7:47:05 AM PST by broken_arrow1 (I regret that I have but one life to give for my country - Nathan Hale "Patriot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davikkm

It seems that Mark Angelides misses the days of yesteryear, when he could read full throated conservative articles in Glamour Magazine.


8 posted on 11/21/2017 7:50:45 AM PST by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson