Reporting is simple. Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts. If she can't stick to the truth and facts, she should step down. They all should step down. There's no reason to make every piece an opinion piece or skew the facts to fit their agendas.
Posted on 10/17/2017 5:25:47 AM PDT by LRoggy
Here's the link to the new email I got this morning with the Video embedded
Summary for those at work who have no access?
The Slimes and others are all proven scum.
Undercover video of Desiree Shoe, Senior Staff Editor, NY Times, going on about how she feels about Trump
Published on Oct 17, 2017
Undercover video obtained by Project Veritas shows New York Times London Senior Staff Editor Desiree Shoe revealing a biased political agenda in the operation of the so-called ‘paper of record.’ Shoe explains a difficulty in reporting about President Donald Trump objectively due to political bias.
In one exchange, she says that journalists covered Trump in such a sensational way during the election season so as to deter readers from voting for him. Shoe also shares her negative opinion of Vice President Mike Pence, citing his religious views.
Senior NTY editor Desiree Shoe, trying to talk off the record.
If you impeach Trump you get Pence who is ‘VERY RELIGIOUS’ and tried to convert Gays, making his REALLY dangerous.
Trump and bias is good for the bottom line
Bias is what the Times readers want
She actually thinks the coverage of Trump is too much but the higher ranked people above her make the call.
Anti-Christian bigot.
And she dares insinuate that Trump is friendly towards those of intolerant supremacist political views.
Why is it the Left doesn’t give a damn about homosexuals who try to convert insecure heterosexuals?
These kind of things are OK, but they never seem to measure up to be the blockbusters they are billed as. I’ll wait for the summary too.
Bttt.
5.56mm
Just about always trace these nut-cases back to a gay agenda.
I just finished watching the video. I think O’Keefe has mastered the art of setting up “honey pots”.
Here is an unattractive 30-something woman who is apparently relishing the male attention she’s getting in the bar she’s apparently in, and opening up after a few beers, not realizing she’s being played.
I just watched it and it really isn’t any big revelation. It basically confirms what we know. The NYT is left leaning (hard) but the bottom dollar is the prime concern so they attempt to keep the articles somewhat unbiased. The opinion section is of course different.
Their journalists, these upper level editors included, are hard left liberals just like we figured.
Like I said; more of a confirmation than a revelation. It is the NYT in NYC after all.
Until very recently I worked in the print media, in the editorial dept. As most of you well know (or suspect), the media is 95% leftist. That number may be a bit lower at a finance-oriented publication, but not much. It begins with the indoctrination that occurs at “journalism school,” added to the students’ self-selection: they all dream of righting societal wrongs (real and imagined) and cracking the next Watergate. It doesn’t help that, like so many other areas of our culture and workplace, the field has become feminized. Women are increasingly occupying top positions, bringing their female or even feminist views with them. They tend to fancy themselves toug grrrls, so heaven help you if you express a dissenting view. The few remaining conservatives (mostly men), have learned to hold their tongues.
Exactly. There is no "news" reporting anymore, there hasn't been any of that for decades. Events must be contextualized to tell a parable about how the people got what they deserved. Like Texas voting for "Trump the Paris Accord deserter" and then them getting the hurricane. So journalism is no longer journalism, it is like football where politics has to be injected to remind those who aren't left how they are the problem.
Reporting is simple. Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts. If she can't stick to the truth and facts, she should step down. They all should step down. There's no reason to make every piece an opinion piece or skew the facts to fit their agendas.
Thank you for your useful summaries!
Ping
I can see how the news can be controlled through digital subscriptions. A rich person like Soros, Bezos, Slim, erc. can buy huge numbers of subscriptions and then threaten to cancel and demand return of funds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.