Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sean_Anthony
I have posted before in detail about Lou Dobbs/Betsy McCaughey saying this is a jobs bill, tweak it and run with it, and I was ok with it, especially with Dr Price making the HHS Secretary "Shall" changes....

However. Is PDJT smarter than we think? This is Ryan's "Apprentice" moment? If so he blew it.

Is his leadership in question and will he be challenged?

Why do I say this? I am listening to Jeff Kuhner out of Boston and he is adamant that Ryan doesn't have the votes....

7 posted on 03/22/2017 9:13:58 AM PDT by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

In the interests of putting some things to bed:

1) No, Mike Pence can’t ignore the Parliamentarian. This would be the mechanism in effect of making all bills budget reconciliation bills. That obviously is just a way to kill the filibuster in the Senate. It would not get even 10 votes. That’s why this proposal has already been dismissed as a non starter.

2) You can stop filibuster in ways not requiring 60 votes? No. You can’t. People are saying this via the Two Speech Rule. Senators are limited to 2 speeches per legislative day on a given subject. So glory be, you can require them to talk, they’re only allowed to talk twice and you shut them down without 60 votes! Bullshit. Completely wrong.

Senators are allowed to offer amendments to a bill. They can then give two speeches on each amendment. A minority can propose zillions of amendments. You CAN limit the number of amendments (NO senators like being limited in amendments) but then if you do that, senators can raise points of order and give two speeches on those. No limit on points of order.

Here’s discussion of this from 2010, when the Dems were raging at the power of the GOP filibusters.

https://shadowproof.com/2010/02/12/talking-filibuster-enforcing-%E2%80%9Ctwo-speech-rule%E2%80%9D-will-not-fix-broken-senate/

Bottom line: THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE. If there were a way around 60 votes that does not constrain to Reconciliation, the Dems would have used it. There is nothing new under the sun in all this. The GOP is not going to discover any genius maneuver. The Dems would have discovered it in 2010 if there were.

The Filibuster is what spared the country from a single payer Canada NHS style healthcare plan. Only the Filibuster and Scott Brown stopped that. You will not find even 10 votes to kill the Filibuster for non USSC issues.


10 posted on 03/22/2017 9:27:26 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: taildragger
I think you might be onto something there. It would explain a lot about why Trump is pushing a bill that is of questionable value at best. When the bill goes down in flames, Trump will be the one guy who can point at Ryan and say: "Hey, it ain't my fault you couldn't get the votes. I did my best to help you!"
15 posted on 03/22/2017 9:47:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 Characters at a Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson