Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Problems With The Hawaii Judge Halting Trump’s Travel Ban
The Federalist ^ | Mar 16, 2017 | Mollie Hemingway

Posted on 03/16/2017 7:28:50 PM PDT by Ray76

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Castigar

As to the 9th Circuit Court:

BREAK THEM UP!

BREAK THEM UP!

BREAK THEM UP!

As a totality, they have become nothing more than out of control AGENDANISTAS...and no longer interested in justice.


21 posted on 03/16/2017 9:02:46 PM PDT by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

I picture this Hawaii judge sitting there wearing flip-flops with one hand down his pants and the other holding a Mai Tai. He’s a disgrace and why in the world should one little judge out in Hawaii (and I guess one in Maryland, too) stand in the way of President Trump’s totally lawful order? There reasoning is totally based in politics. It’s really time for some Trump judges to get confirmed.


22 posted on 03/16/2017 9:31:28 PM PDT by No Dems 2016
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

4. Confusion about the Establishment Clause
The plaintiffs in the case [] said the executive order denies them their right to associate with family members overseas and results in “having to live in a country and in a State where there is the perception that the Government has established a disfavored religion.”
The problem is that Watson neglects to note that the Establishment Clause has not been held by courts to apply to immigration policy

*************************************

If you can extend U.S. and Constitutional rights to “Aliens” not yet here, then the U.S. is not a sovereign state but a world givernment.

If Constitutional rights are enjoyed by anyone desiring entrance to the U.S. then all other rights and privileges extend to them as well under this ruling and I wonder if they are not “disenfranchised “ as potential voters.

Further, why wouldn’t they also enjoy “The Right of the People “ to 2nd amendment privileges.?


23 posted on 03/16/2017 11:36:21 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

She’s been on before.

Tucker had brought up the completely valid argument of constitutional protections applying to foreign nationals killed during US airstrikes. She denied the situations being similar. However, had he added those foreigners having a relative legally residing in the US, he would have had her.


24 posted on 03/16/2017 11:47:31 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

Judicial TYRANNY on display.

Anti-constitutional, anti-truth, anti-freedom. America’s robed mullahs ALERT!

LOCK THEM UP!


25 posted on 03/17/2017 12:23:45 AM PDT by PGalt (HOORAY President Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hyman Roth

Right and how long before another Looney Liberal Judge puts a stop to the wall?


26 posted on 03/17/2017 5:43:49 AM PDT by Colo9250 (Judges are not above the law, arrest and prosecute them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson