Posted on 03/10/2017 11:12:18 AM PST by Sean_Anthony
Just another attempt to herd human beings into tiny spaces in order to control land use, mobility, and urban sprawl, all Sustainable Development goals.
Now Pushing U.N. Agenda 2030 with Social Engineering of the Elderly
The One World Governance of U.N. Agenda 21, now morphed into U.N. Agenda 2030, requires that every societal decision be based on the environmental impact on global land use, education, and population control and reduction.
The lynchpin of this agenda, Sustainable Development, has deemed “not sustainable” most human activities that form our modern civilization: private property, suburban sprawl, fossil fuels, consumerism, farming, irrigation, commercial agriculture, pesticides, herbicides, farmland, grazing of livestock, paved roads, golf courses, ski lodges, logging, dams, reservoirs, fences, power lines, and the family unit.
fight urban sprawl.... knock down the UN building
UN = UNnecessary
the infowarrior
These countries have a lot in common, including English common law and the English language. They could form a counterweight against the tide of insanity fostered by the UN.
Answer: you.
Ping.
Level it and dispense with the UN by any means necessary. They are anti-humanists and tyrant's to the core.
The header is a tad misleading because the elderly are not mentioned until the last few paragraphs.
Some of the ideas for the elderly make perfect sense.
This article’s title is just trying to cause dissension.
.
“the family unit”
This proves they are anti-human nature.
F the UN
Expel the UN from our shores.
“Some of the ideas for the elderly make perfect sense”
Maybe for city people-but definitely not to people in rural areas like this one-most of us were born and bred to a natural, sustainable lifestyle with gardens, livestock, clean air, a quiet environment where you can see the stars at night, without tiny cramped apartments, shopping centers, theaters, etc-living near any of that stuff doesn’t make sense at any age to country people-we aren’t ants or bees-the city can have it’s “conveniences”...
United Nations, blue helmet, globalist stuff—coming to your town when you’re not paying attention. It comes in various “good for you” disguises.
One group (of many) pushing Agenda 2030 in the US is the Henry George Foundation. If you hear the phrases “land trust” “land use policy” or “single tax” pay close attention and put a stop to it.
Georgism is Marxism lite, and is particularly insidious because the ideology purports to encourage capitalism and economic freedom, while at the same time essentially taxing private property out of existence by dictating that all property must be “sustainably” placed in commerce.
You can’t just own property because you have that right, and let it sit vacant, or will it to your heirs.
So IOW, the Committee decides your herd of goats doesn’t need 500 acres, it only needs 20; you don’t really need that deer camp that you only use once a year; and Grandma’s shabby 2 story Victorian needs to be turned into student apartments.
So the “excess” acreage / square footage is taxed at an exhorbitant rate to “encourage” you to place it in the “land trust” and avoid the taxes.
You can later regain control of your own property, (and you’re actually encouraged to engage in capitalism!) at reduced tax rates, if you come up with a “sustainable” plan to put it to “fair use.”
Good luck with that, since the Committee of Deciders may have other plans.
I agree that rural elderly wouldn’t care about those things but I don’t get your “tiny apartment” comment.I saw nothing about tiny apartments in the article.
.
“Some of the ideas for the elderly make perfect sense.”
Only if freely chosen by the elderly. If Grandma doesn’t want to move into a tinyhouse or an assisted living facility, the gubbermint has no right to force her to do so.
Because aged people who need walkers to stay on their feet are just so eager to have to use them outdoors, to walk everywhere in the neighborhood.
Really, the height of elitist age-ist ignorance. But that's the UN for you.
So long as we are members of this organization and have its headquarters on out soil these things are not really opposable. No matter what we think we are doing with elections these things creep into our society. Zoning is becoming universal and refusal of projects becoming more commonplace. Our wild lands are being reserved for the exclusive use of the Elite and we are being forced into those high rises in supposed park land that the liberals were dreaming about way back in the fifties effectively and way before in their pie-in-the-sky fantasies.
How can you do a plural correctly then turn around and put in a possessive apostrophe just two words later?
When you have to depend on a government clerk for permission to do something then part of the cost of doing business is paying off the clerk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.