Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why do millions of white working class and middle class people believe that Donald Trump <tr>
Quora.com ^ | Jan. 25, 2017 | Curtis Lindsay

Posted on 02/05/2017 5:46:11 AM PST by chajin

On the surface of it, it really is mystifying.

I was a kid in the 1980s and 1990s, and I remember well how most middle-American adults in my life thought and spoke of Donald Trump at that time. He was a Manhattanite billionaire playboy who couldn’t stay off the talk shows and tabloids. His name and image were synonymous with obscene wealth and a decadent lifestyle. He treated women badly, it was known. Small business people, farmers, and factory workers rolled their eyes at Donald Trump. His values could not have had less to do with theirs. Many probably hated him and everything he stood for...

There’s always talk of how those politicians who are career attorneys with Ivy League pedigrees, hail from upper-crust families, and maybe vacation in the Hamptons or the French Riviera are maybe a bit out of touch with common people.

But here we have a real estate tycoon for whom the Reagan years were one long limousine ride, an unapologetic egomaniac who delights in throwing his name up in lights, and a guy who made a television career out of firing people on camera: one would think such a person would represent a whole higher echelon of “out of touch.”

So, yeah — how did this man transform himself into the populist savior of the working class?

(Excerpt) Read more at quora.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: election; progressives; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Full title: "Why do millions of white working class and middle class people believe that Donald Trump cares about them?" Originally posted in Nov. 2016, revised in late January. If this was posted earlier, I apologize.

I found this interesting because, like Mr. Lindsay, my studies in college were music and philosophy, along with an MBA. He is something rare in the Left, an honest progressive. His understanding of the Trump phenomenon is not 100% accurate, but it is closer to the truth than most on the Left will say, and certainly closer than most of the Left believes.

Lindsay's mistake is that he genuinely believes in "democratic socialism" as the means of removing inequality from society, rather than realizing that inequality will never be removed from society, and working instead for the rising tide that lifts all boats, not worrying that some boats will be bigger than others. He is, however, knowledgeable and honest, and might be persuaded, over time, to a set of intellectual arguments for conservatism, much as I was in the 1980s, when I was out of college and he was a baby.

1 posted on 02/05/2017 5:46:11 AM PST by chajin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: chajin

Because the last two Democratic Presidents were lying, cheating, America betraying bastards with lying, wretched spouses?


2 posted on 02/05/2017 5:51:24 AM PST by 50sDad (A Liberal prevents me from telling you anything here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

The author is an ignorant liar. As a New Yorker since the early 70s (well, a Manhattanite) I can tell you Trump never had a reputation like that. His reputation was as a builder first of glitzy buildings and a guy who had several marriages to blond women second. He had a pretty long marriage to Ivana and most of the tabloids had to do with them going to society parties hosted by Brooke Astor, the gilding of General Sherman on 5th Avenue and the purchasing of The Plaza Hotel. We all worried he was going to paint it gold! He did not. Of course, his affair with Marla made the papers for a while but he did the right thing with her as well. But first and foremost, he was known as a brash builder. He was also off the pages of the two NYC tabloids for years at a time. The lies about this man are out of control and no one seems interested in combating them.

Thank God for his twitter account.


3 posted on 02/05/2017 5:55:35 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

“I’ve been sheltered from a number of the realities that my parents had to face in their lives.”

The only rational thing he said. Lots of me, me, me.


4 posted on 02/05/2017 5:56:59 AM PST by Mercat (Men never do evil so fully and cheerfully as when they do it out of conscience.” (Blaise Pascal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

That and it was plainly obvious that Hillary didn’t care about anything or anyone but her empire and herself. We didn’t know what we would be getting with Trump, but we knew damn well what we would be getting with Hillary Clinton.


5 posted on 02/05/2017 5:57:22 AM PST by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

I agree. When most civil, clear-thinking people considered the future under these malignant poltroons, they voted for someone who MIGHT be able to turn the course. In the last couple decades, the government has been full of frauds and schemers...it still is. Hopefully, President Trump and his team will weather the storm, punish the frauds and use the Rule of Law to hold these criminals accountable for their crimes.


6 posted on 02/05/2017 5:57:56 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chajin

I think that both sides, Democrat and Republican, the normal people, not people wearing a giant vagina, just want a politician to do what he says he’ll do. What Trump proposed in the campaign was rational and good for everybody. (Granted, the people wearing a vagina don’t see it that way, but they appear to be idiots.)


7 posted on 02/05/2017 5:59:10 AM PST by Gen.Blather (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

I don’t agree with him, but his screed is well-written and he recognizes the existence of alternative viewpoints, if not their validity, unlike the vacuous Hollywood idiots and much, if not most, of the media. The historical problem that “democratic socialism” faces is that it doesn’t work; if you bring up Soviet Russia, they will always cite the “betrayal” of Stalin and respond that “well, true communism has never been tried”. Well, it has been tried, and it always ends up with the same result: enrichment of a tyrant and his family (Castos, Mugabe, the Chinese leadership) at the expense of the impoverishment of everyone outside the protected class.


8 posted on 02/05/2017 5:59:21 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

I don’t agree with him, but his screed is well-written and he recognizes the existence of alternative viewpoints, if not their validity, unlike the vacuous Hollywood idiots and much, if not most, of the media. The historical problem that “democratic socialism” faces is that it doesn’t work; if you bring up Soviet Russia, they will always cite the “betrayal” of Stalin and respond that “well, true communism has never been tried”. Well, it has been tried, and it always ends up with the same result: enrichment of a tyrant and his family (Castos, Mugabe, the Chinese leadership) at the expense of the impoverishment of everyone outside the protected class.


9 posted on 02/05/2017 5:59:29 AM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

Just goes to prove even the news of the 80’s and 90’s had a bias slant only focused on certain aspects of Donald’s life and not him as whole person.


10 posted on 02/05/2017 6:00:30 AM PST by b4me (If Jesus came to set us free, why are so many professed Believers still in chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chajin

I don’t think “caring” makes a difference. I just want Constitutional government, first, and policies with which I agree, second.


11 posted on 02/05/2017 6:05:23 AM PST by Tax-chick ("If you think free speech is assault but assault is free speech, you're a moron.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

And because he grew up and became responsible. People change.


12 posted on 02/05/2017 6:06:38 AM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

America overreacted in 2008. We have been correcting course ever since. America leans to the right, not the left. Too bad for the liberals who think the answer is to move even farther to the left.


13 posted on 02/05/2017 6:06:59 AM PST by RC one (The 2nd Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chajin

“Many probably hated him and everything he stood for”

I don’t agree w/the author’s assessment of Trump’s public perception. Only communists hated him because he was a capitalist.

I simply saw him as a rich guy that also acquired some public fame. Not much different that someone like Getty.

Per why would I think that he “cares” - it gets a bit abstract.

My perception is that he thinks more like I do. I hear the communist spiel from the left and the press and think “You f’n idiots, don’t you realize that the harder you make it for a successful person to succeed, the harder you make it on yourself?”

The more difficult it is for a business to operate means it’s harder for YOU to start and open your own business.

The more that property rights are violated in order to distribute “fairly”, the fewer property rights YOU have.

So I don’t think Trump cares about me in particular, but I think he does care about removing the impediments that would allow others to succeed.

Some businesses want to use government corner their own market (e.g. GE and light bulbs). I don’t think Trump is interested in that. He seems to want a free market.

As such, his self interest is the same as mine.


14 posted on 02/05/2017 6:08:13 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

For this jerk, History ENDED with November 8!


15 posted on 02/05/2017 6:22:09 AM PST by Flintlock (The ballot box STOLEN, our soapbox taken away--the BULLET BOX is left to us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chajin

Yup, I was against Reagan, but at the end of his terms I choked up as I realized that he had done exactly what he set out to do - it was morning again in America. This kid has never seen a real president.


16 posted on 02/05/2017 6:24:40 AM PST by ichabod1 (The Wise Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Well, the one thing he DID always have was a big mouth. Also forgotten in all the hate is how all of these big networks used to use him as a pundit.


17 posted on 02/05/2017 6:28:36 AM PST by ichabod1 (The Wise Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Also, about that time Art of the Deal came out and he EXPLAINED his technique of using the media for free air time by being outrageous. I used to say during the campaign that it seemed like, to Donald, having to pay for advertising was about equivalent to having to pay for sex.


18 posted on 02/05/2017 6:32:34 AM PST by ichabod1 (The Wise Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
He was a Manhattanite billionaire playboy who couldn’t stay off the talk shows and tabloids.

You cannot be a billionaire playboy and make the billion dollars yourself through your own hard work.

It's hard work building anything at a cost that is less than it's fair market value. Every chickenshit construction company, worker, supplier, zoning and licensing official is out to take you to the cleaners for more than all you are worth.

Just try getting someone to fix your kitchen sink and multiply that experience by 100,000,000.

Playboy my ass. Someone with the instincts of a mafioso hit-man, I would buy. But lazy drunken (oh he doesn't drink) womanizer, Hah!

19 posted on 02/05/2017 6:36:01 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chajin
This reminds me of elite leftists asking after Reagan's re-election "Why do so many Americans vote against their own best interests," meaning "Why don't they vote for more and more social programs?"

That is the very definition of an elitist.

20 posted on 02/05/2017 6:39:58 AM PST by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson