Posted on 11/27/2016 2:02:32 PM PST by TheRef
There is no chance that HIllary can win. See http://politicalref.com/permalink/16—11-24_michigan_certified.php and this http://politicalref.com/permalink/16—11-23_why_recounts_wont_bring_hillary_back.php
There are many angry Hillary supporters. By calling for these recounts, Stein becomes their hero. Simple.
Let’s face it. . .most people don’t have a clue who she is.
I do agree it will be wasted money if they hope to reverse the election, because that is not going to happen. In reality is is nothing more than kabuki theater.
She will have more name recognition, but not really anything that will amount to much.
If Soros is behind the money she has raised, which I believe is the case, then there is something more to this than just her building name recognition. Though that may be why she agreed to being the face & force behind the recount effort. But the real reason is something such as trying to throw the election into Congress & the Senate to pick the President & Vice President respectively. Or if they have people in these states who can provide the margin needed to make Hillary the victor, then that is another scenario.
One thing for sure is that if it is claimed that Hillary won all three states, there will be outbreaks of violence.
a person who has 1% of the vote and no hope of winning overall, should not be allowed to apply for a recount.
The recount effort is also promoting the whole Green Party.
This is a great opportunity for the Green Party to grab the attention of dissatisfied Bernie Democrats.
Only for the moment. Come four years from now they will have moved on to whomever, and it won’t be Jill Stein.
Contested Elections and Recounts 2 - The US Election Assistance - Look for that in this google search, it is a PDF (currently fourth on the list).
So why don’t the court stop OB from taking office when people filed that he was ineligible.
Can we all ask for a recount (hard to believe) but not challenge to have eligible candidates?
Even if she does win all 3 states, all that does is throw it to Congress & the Senate where she will still lose.
However, what that does accomplish is make her lemmings convinced that Trump is illegitimate and fight tooth and nail against everything Trump does as President. Keeps them on the plantation in other words for the mid-term elections and the 2020 Presidential election cycle.
Which BTW, will see Jill Stein garner the same percentage (or close to it) of the vote as she did in this election cycle.
Hillary is not dumb — she has known from the very beginning that Jill was using her as a front to promote her personal cause but HRC allows her name to be used as a vehicle to create chaos in the elective process. Hill and Jill are partners in this recount process.
For raising an eligibility ruling you have to have standing, and they do not see voters as having the standing to question eligibility. For that you have to actually have skin in the election. In other words you have to be running for the office as well. Only then do you have standing because the eligibility of another candidate would affect you personally.
Now you might say well it affects every citizen, but they see it that we lose nothing other than our preferred candidate will have to compete against them. Probably done to limit the number of eligibility suits the courts would have to contend with. In the case of Obama, we would probably have never had an election at all, as millions would have questioned his eligibility. 8>)
what is the “standing” of someone with 1% of the vote challenging the election. What is the statistical probability their 1% will change to the plurality. I would say .0000000001%
So she should have no standing. Only someone who has a chance to have the numbers change them into a winner from a loser should have such standing.
As far as eligibility. I have the right to vote and the right to an honest election. If a secretary of state or a court refuses to investigate the eligibility of a candidate then I should have standing to challenge the candidate on the basis I have the right to an honest election. I know from personal experience the secretary of state in CA was sent information regarding the allegation Obama was not a US citizen. provisos secretary of state in CA took Eldrige Cleaver off the ballot for not being eligible. I live in Cal, therefore, i should have standing to challenge and ineligible candidate on the CA ballot.
Yet the USSC turned down more than 1 case because the petitioner did not have “standing.”
Yertle, is that you?
As for the standing, you are arguing your case to the wrong person. I can pretty confidently guarantee though, no judge will rule in your favor. Let me know how it goes though, and I hope I am wrong and that you win for future elections. 8>)
It's obvious to me...when I look at them.
But why is that????
just went through her recent twitter feed, she has a few good points but some stupid ones too. She;s keeps saying Clinton and Trump want democracy...
what does Jill want usa to be?
She also says suggests doing away with electoral college, use popular vote.
So many people would be Sooooo unhappy if we had no EC and elections were constantly decided by city dwellers in local, state and national elections.
Get in line all you climate change lemming retards and follow your Jim Jones of politics off the cliff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.